Curious what people think about where to host moderately complicated applications these days. (To scope that, I’ve got 2 multi-tenant phoenix apis, 3 postgres db servers, 2 small independent little services, rabbitmq, an opentelemetry collector and log shipper at the moment) Deployed into 3 environments.
Infrastructure as Code is a requirement, which unfortunately rules out fly, which is where we are now. I’m thinking that something like DigitalOcean on Kubernetes, or taking (another) risk on a platform like Render.
Anyone have experience with either of these platforms? Are there other simple options (ahem, not AWS) out there?
I have looked quite a lot at Vultr but I have not used them. There offering seems competitive and their network was fast when testing all the cloud providers.
Logflare is my pick either hosted or self hosted for logging using google bigquery, very economical.
Other than that I use fly for some things and getting projects up and running in non production quickly. I also host my own gitea on fly.io using sqlite backend rather than using Gitlab or GitHub. It’s very fast.
If you can qualify for the AWS startup $100k credit I wouldn’t ignore AWS.
My biggest challenge for security compliance is that only the major clouds like AWS, Azure or Google meet the requirements. So ultimately for anything of value it has to be those three.
Fly also just launched FKS ( Fly Kubernetes Service) if kubernetes is a hard requirement for you. Also note that folks run kubernetes themselves on fly already so we’re probably lower level than you’re thinking. We can run anything in a container. My guess is we tick all the IaC boxes for you already.
I don’t trust, the best I can do is verify the independent audit reports and compliance certifications and make risk based decisions. The security posture of the AWS, Azure and Google clouds is sufficient for most government systems and meeting privacy requirements of most countries (non defence and national security use cases) but it is something you have to consider on a service by service basis as not all services are created equal or they contain elements that are not managed at the same level.
A classic one is Microsoft Purview, a data governance solution which crawls all over your entire digital estate and yet doesn’t meet government compliance standards. Several times the resulting risk assessment is a handbrake on the plans of a newly established business unit tasked with implementing enterprise data governance, and of course like most corporate lemmings they reach for Microsoft. “Not happy” directors.
Vultr has good global coverage including Australia and SE Asia and a reasonable level of security compliance as well which is also improved recently.
Vultr are also good for HA setups with floating IP which avoids the cost and upper limits on throughout of cloud service load balancers and additional latency.
Vultr also actively support FreeBSD which I prefer for servers due to better networking with Erlang BEAM as FreeBSD kqueue is more efficient and scalable than anything Linux does. The total observaility of every subsystem is something I could not pass up.
AWS also provide a good option with their Firecracker VMs which boot FreeBSD in 25ms. With such a fast boot time you can instantly demand scale and failover without paying for headroom or contingency.
For deployment I also prefer FreeBSD jail’s which are also supported by Nomad.
I would not trust hetzner with anything serious, at the end of the day there is a price for their dirt-cheap servers. Dev servers and pipelines I would go for hetzner all day long, especially with their new ARM servers.
One of my previous employer had some serious problems back in the day hosting hardware in their datacenters, it was so bad that at some point they were planning on taking legal action.
Well in Australia at least the cloud providers and the entire supply chain do get to enjoy a rigorous assurance process if they want to participate.
Datacenters must be certified strategic, which involves multiple Agency assessments including intelligence agencies. Similarly cloud service providers are also subject to specific audits. Liability for data service providers is unlimited as is any important cloud service…
That’s an excellent insight on FreeBSD. Thanks! I recently started looking around to escape the mess the Linux is, and apart from a bit chaotic firewall frontends story, it seems like a breath of fresh air!
I’m curious if it would be possible to apply Kamal’s approach on FreeBSD with Elixir releases. That is, build and pack release and do blue/green deployment. That would be nice!
(Given that FreeBSD doesn’t support OCI containers as far as I know).
For deployment I also prefer FreeBSD jail’s which are also supported by Nomad .