redpoll
Hi, I am wondering if this could be possible:
for x <- 0..5 do
<%= @computer{x}_id %>
end
I have tried
<%= {"computer#{x}_id"} %>
which actually renders computer1_id, computer2_id etc. as a string, but does not run the command to get the actual id from the @computer1 assigned to the socket. Is what I want possible?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley:
Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Hello
I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
Xty
You can probably do the following:
This works because
@computer1is shorthand forassigns.computer1which can also be expressed asassigns[computer1]APB9785
You shouldn’t dynamically create atoms - that’s not what they’re for. If you anticipate NEEDING interpolation (e.g. you have 1000 computers), then each one should not be given its own atom key in the assigns, but rather stored with string (or integer) keys in a map, like:
Then you can access the ids from the template like:
But if you don’t have so many IDs, and you would like to keep each one as a separate atom key in the assigns, then you should create a helper function in your view which explicitly handles each case, for example:
and then in the template
Xty
It’s usually a bad idea to create atoms dynamically, yes. But in this case I’d argue it’s fine, considering they’re not generated from random user input, but rather a bounded well-defined range.
Could also use
String.to_existing_atomto do it without risking the usual problems with dynamically generated atoms.benwilson512
It’s all still sort of weird though, it’d be much more idiomatic to have the key of the
computersmap just be theiditself, I don’t see how it helps to have it surrounded by extra atom or string content:Then you can simply look up the computers by
id. BUT even this is sort of weird, it would make more sense for the@computersassign to be an ordinary list where the items are simply sorted already into the desired order, and then it can be iterated through asfor computer <- @computers doand we skip all of the extra lookups.Xty
Agreed! Your suggestions are definitely more idiomatic and likely the way to go.
I just took the opportunity to show how to dynamically access assigns if needed.