apoorv-2204
The issue:
I would like to consume stream one by one.But its not possible look below examples.
iex(1)> s = 1..1000 |> Stream.map(& "Consumed #{&1}")
#Stream<[enum: 1..1000, funs: [#Function<49.82544474/1 in Stream.map/2>]]>
iex(2)> s |> Enum.take(1)
["Consumed 1"]
iex(3)> s |> Enum.take(1)
["Consumed 1"]
iex(4)> s |> Enum.take(2)
["Consumed 1", "Consumed 2"]
iex(5)> s |> Enum.take(2)
["Consumed 1", "Consumed 2"]
iex(6)> s |> Enum.take(1)
["Consumed 1"]
iex(7)> s |> Enum.take(1)
["Consumed 1"]
iex(8)> s |> Enum.take(1)
["Consumed 1"]
iex(9)> s |> Enum.take(1)
["Consumed 1"]
Expectations: When I do Enum.take(1) , I expect it to consume one element, and When I do I expect it to return the next element.
s |> Enum.take(1) =>["Consumed 1"]
s |> Enum.take(1) =>["Consumed 2"]
s |> Enum.take(1) =>["Consumed 3"]
s |> Enum.take(1) =>["Consumed 4"]
s |> Enum.take(1) =>["Consumed 5"]
s |> Enum.take(1) =>["Consumed 6"]
What is that I am doing wrong?
How to achieve this behaviour.?
I impl this behaviour using processes, but I am not sure how valid it is.See below
defmodule StatfulStream do
@moduledoc false
def start(stream, fx) do
spawn(fn ->
stream
|> Stream.map(fn chunk ->
fx.(chunk)
IO.inspect(chunk, label: :inside)
wait()
chunk
end)
|> Enum.to_list()
|> IO.inspect(label: :end)
end)
end
def wait() do
receive do
:process ->
:ok
end
end
def ge_str() do
Stream.resource(
fn -> 1 end,
fn
10 ->
{:halt, 10}
1 ->
{[1], 2}
v ->
{[v], v + 1}
end,
fn v -> IO.inspect(v) end
)
end
def r() do
str = ge_str()
fx = fn r ->
IO.inspect(r, label: :fx)
end
start(str, fx)
end
def send(p) do
Process.send(p, :process, [])
end
end
This is how ran it.
iex(1)> import StatfulStream
StatfulStream
iex(2)> pid= r()
fx: 1
#PID<0.237.0>
inside: 1
iex(3)> send(pid)
fx: 2
:ok
inside: 2
iex(4)> send(pid)
fx: 3
:ok
inside: 3
iex(5)> send(pid)
fx: 4
:ok
inside: 4
iex(6)> send(pid)
fx: 5
:ok
inside: 5
iex(7)> send(pid)
fx: 6
:ok
inside: 6
iex(8)> send(pid)
fx: 7
:ok
inside: 7
iex(9)> send(pid)
fx: 8
:ok
inside: 8
iex(10)> send(pid)
fx: 9
:ok
inside: 9
iex(11)> send(pid)
10
:ok
end: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
iex(12)> send(pid)
:ok
iex(13)>
What you think ? whats valid? , and How to impl it?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
That’s not what should happen. Elixir doesn’t differenciate “streams” – lazily producing enumerables – from other enumerables like lists or maps – all of them are Enumerables. Hence
Enumworks exactly the same if you provide either of those – each individual call ofEnum.take(enumerable, 1)gives you a list with the first item of the enumerable, which means the same result given the enumerable stayed the same. If there are sideffects they’re hidden behind the enumerable interface. Iterating over an enumerable doesn’t change the input enumerable.You could probably build an api over
Enumerable.reducefor stateful iteration of an enumerable, but the intermediate states wouldn’t necessarily themselves be enumerable. So an enumerable could just be the input to such a new api.apoorv-2204
But the issue is I am passing ref here and there b/w functions I(.e in genserver handle info )and want to resume it where i left it.
LostKobrakai
That’s not how the
Enumerableabstraction works though. I don’t know what you’re streaming there, but I’d consider using other apis instead of an enumerable.apoorv-2204
I am streaming here a S3 object, or a file. And I am sending it to 3310 port to clamd for scanning
Ecclesiastes
Start a GenServer to handle the streaming logic.
Initialize GenServer state with an offset (e.g.,
0) ininit/1.store the stream object in an ETS table.
krasenyp
Or, use the process state as storage.