nathanl

nathanl

Is this how Phoenix.Channel and PubSub should interact?

I came across some interactions between Channels and PubSub yesterday which surprised me. This is using phoenix 1.7.1 and phoenix_pubsub 2.1.1.

If I have a Phoenix.Channel on topic "some_topic and a client connected to it:

  • Phoenix.PubSub.broadcast(MyApp.PubSub, "some_topic", %{some: "message"} will go to that channel process’s handle_info/2 even if it did not call Phoenix.PubSub.subscribe/3, and will go N+1 times if it did explicitly subscribe N times.
  • MyApp.Endpoint.broadcast("some_topic", "some_event", %{some: "message"}) will go directly to the connected client of the channel without the channel process ever seeing it unless the channel process intercepts it.

Is this how it’s intended to work? My mental model was “only processes which explicitly PubSub.subscribe/3 will get a PubSub event, and it will go to their handle_info/2, where they can do what they will.” I see that handle_out/3 exists for interception, so clearly that’s by design…

I’ve been using Phoenix for years and didn’t realize that the topics were shared between Channels and PubSub. But I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer. :wink:

Most Liked

chrismccord

chrismccord

Creator of Phoenix

Yes this is working exactly it is supposed to :slight_smile:

Channel broadcasts (broacast(socket, ...) and Endpoint.broadcast )) are “fast-laned” directly to the transport process unless you intercept. This allows us to encode the the message a single time vs N times for every subscriber. Phoenix.PubSub.broadcast is lower level and broadcasts the raw elixir term as is, vs channel broadcast where it is wrapped internally in a Phoenix.Socket.Broadcast struct. As far as your dup subscriptions go, it’s the subscribers job to avoid duplicate subscriptions as there is a performance cost in checking on the subscribe side. Hope that helps!

Last Post!

nathanl

nathanl

Yes, with the difference that if I forget to intercept a particular message, it will go to the client, but if I forget to handle_info one, it will blow up and I’ll notice in development.

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

rms.mrcs
Hi, I need to transform a list of numbers into a map where the keys are the indexes and the values are the original values of the list. ...
New
JeremM34
Hello, how can I check the Phoenix version ? Thanks !
New
minhajuddin
I have seen a lot of code which picks the first element from a list using Enum.at(0) instead of List.first. Is there a reason why people ...
New
vonH
When I run the Plug and I recompile I wind up having to use Ctrl C to quit iex and start again. Witht the help of rlwrap I can use the cu...
New
lessless
I believe there are people here who are dealing with CSV files import on the daily basis, and since Excel is a really popular tool there ...
New
JorisKok
I have a server on AWS, and was running a load test using artillery. When looking at the Phoenix dashboard I see the Ports going to 100% ...
New
jason.o
In the code below, if the create action is not set to accept “extra_key” as an input, it errors out with a message shown above. Is there ...
New

Other popular topics Top

electic
Hi, I am new to Elixir. I am trying to use the DateTime component to insert a date into MySQL however the there seems to be no way to fo...
New
grych
Hi folks, Few months ago I have announced the proof-of-concept of the library to manipulate the browsers DOM objects directly from Elixi...
639 54006 488
New
New
jononomo
For some reason my phoenix channels are working for me in my local dev environment, but as soon as I deploy via Docker, I get a 403 error...
New
openscript
Hello! Sorry for this astonishing simple question, but I’m really stuck. I try to set up the intellij-elixir plugin, but I don’t know ho...
New
ashish173
I am using Ecto timestamps with postgres, I can see the timestamps() use the :naive_dateime but for my use case I wanted to store the ti...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement