th3mus1cman
Issues with starting multiple Broadway pipelines with DynamicSupervisor
Is it possible to start a Broadway pipeline with a DynamicSupervisor? Well, it is possible start at least one but when I try to start multiple only the first one starts.
I tried overriding the default child_spec with
%{
id: "#{__MODULE__}:#{unique_id}",
start: {__MODULE__, :start_link, [destination: destination]},
shutdown: :infinity
}
but then none of the pipelines start and I am getting zero errors.
I overrode the default child_spec because this is the implementation:
default = %{
id: unquote(module),
start: {__MODULE__, :start_link, [arg]},
shutdown: :infinity
}
I have also defined a process_name:
@impl Broadway
def process_name({:via, module, {registry, name}}, base_name) do
{:via, module, {registry, "#{base_name}:#{name}"}}
end
This is how I am starting the pipeline:
DynamicSupervisor.start_child(
ER.DynamicSupervisor,
{ER.Destinations.Pipeline.S3, [destination: destination]}
)
def start_link(opts) do
broadway_config = get_broadway_config(opts[:destination])
context = %{
destination: broadway_config.destination
}
result =
Broadway.start_link(__MODULE__,
name: broadway_config.name,
producer: [
module:
{OffBroadwayEcto.Producer,
client: {ER.Destinations.Pipeline.Client, [destination: broadway_config.destination]}}
],
context: context,
processors: [
default: [concurrency: broadway_config.processor_concurrency]
],
batchers: [
s3: [
concurrency: broadway_config.batcher_concurrency,
batch_size: broadway_config.batch_size,
batch_timeout: broadway_config.batch_timeout
]
]
)
Anyone have any ideas what I could be doing it wrong? Or if it is possible? Thanks
First Post!
dimitarvp
Have you been able to solve this? Admittedly I can’t offer help as I haven’t worked with Broadway for a while – but I also never tried what you do.
Last Post!
th3mus1cman
Sadly I have not yet solved the problem. I did open an issue on the Broadway repo on Github. At this point I am thinking it is something internal to Broadway that is the issue but always open to it being my code. ![]()
If I can’t structure my pipelines this way I have been thinking about alternatives. I just don’t like anything that I have come up with yet. I have thought about trying to use a regular supervisor and not a dynamic supervisor but I just don’t know why that difference would matter. I am not an expert on the differences between the two so maybe there is something there that is causing an issue.
Popular in Questions
Other popular topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #elixirconf-us
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #forms
- #api
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex









