Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Background
I use a library called rop in my code, which is basically an implementation of the Error/Result Monad.
On my never ending search for improvement, I have decided to adopt mix format in one of my personal projects.
Problem
The problem here is that mix format and the rop library don’t play nice together. The library defines as a macro the operator >>>, which is also the same operator used for bitwise operations in Elixir.
So the code does not get properly formatted. Ever.
I have tried to contact the maintainer of the project via the project page by creating issues, but to no avail. The project has also not been updated for several years now which leads to me to think its sunny days are long behind it.
Instead of cloning the project and doing a duplicate of someone else’s work (albeit with some changes and fixes) I have decided it would be preferable to look for another library.
What am I looking for?
I am looking for Monad libraries in Elixir that:
- work with
mix format(this means the pipeline operators must be one of elixir/lib/elixir/lib/code/formatter.ex at v1.11.4 · elixir-lang/elixir · GitHub) - have an error monad that allows me to pipe values like in Rop
- the project must not be archived
Thus I have found the following options:
Which is not a lot …
Question
Cloning the library in question to fix it is not totally out of question, however unless I add some serious heat to the project I see it more as polluting the hex archive with a duplicate of something that already exists.
- what would you do in my situation?
- what other monad / fp libraries do you know?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #ai
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 5- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
kokolegorille
Maybe Witchcraft. You might also find videos from the author…
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=brooklyn+zelenka
But You might have the same formatting concerns.
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Unfortunately Witchcraft also uses the bitwise operator for certain operations. That is why I didn’t include it:
https://github.com/witchcrafters/witchcraft#operators
It breaks the first requirement
fuelen
The library is so small, that I’d rather copy that 1 macro to my codebase and replace
>>>with~>>hauleth
Maybe change an idea a little and write your own macro like:
Now it is useable like:
Which will be logically equivalent to:
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
@fuelen @hauleth I understand I could do a change like that. As I mentioned it wouldn’t be out of the scope, however (ignoring the risk of repeating myself):