SpoonWood
Hello Everyone,
We are using LiveView to build a feature that displays some information in the admin dashboard of our Application, but we are not quite sure how to secure the websocket against access of non registered users.
Is the socket secure if we are using a signing salt and a Session key, having installed LiveView the exact Way thats recommended on Hexdocs.pm (we are using LiveView 0.8.1 currently)
Thank you very much in Advance
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
bruteforcecat
there should be lots of different approach. But one approach is using Phoenix.Token to sign some user session data. and then in Socket.connect/3 we can verify if the token is valid. because the token is signed, it helps us against of tampering but if you don’t want people able to see what’s inside the token, you can also use
Phoenix.Token.encryptchrismccord
Add your
liveroute definition behind your regular:adminplug/pipeline that performs admin user authentication and you are all set. You can reference the user off the HTTP request, and fallback to the user_id in the session, which comes from a signed token on the client, so you are covered in both HTTP and WebSocket cases security wise:LostKobrakai
I’m wondering if we’d need to talk about another factor of security for liveview:
A liveview process is long lived and potentially valid indefinitely if the connection is kept alive. For http one would check the validity of the user for each request, because it’s stateless. With stateful connections this can be more tiered, e.g. let the user read things for a certain time (or indefinitely) while e.g. checking validity for each writing operation. Even writing operations could be tiered to only creating data and destructive operations overwriting existing data. But I’m not really seeing those options used in the wild. Most people seem to fetch the user once and let it be valid for the lifetime of the liveview process. Isn’t this a potentially dangerous way of handling authentication?
josevalim
Every operation you do against the database needs to be verified for user permission, you need to check if the user belongs to that organization, if they are the manager of a project, if they can access that chat room, etc. This logic is generally kept in the context, tied to the domain operation, so you go through it regardless if you are interacting with your domain via live views or controllers. In code, this means you should do:
Instead of:
Failing to scope this on regular HTTP requests can also be very troublesome, as it means a user can access any other organization.
The scenario you describe is only a concern if you are “preloading” permissions and storing it somewhere, which is not different from putting it in a cache, or an agent, live view state, etc.
And for things like user access, LV supports disconnecting any enabled socket. I even plan to submit changes to
mix phx.gen.authso we perform this disconnection by default on logout.LostKobrakai
This is the part my question was targeted at - user sessions. If a session is compromised and the session key is removed from its storage on the server fresh http requests will fail to validate. For liveview existing connections either need to be closed if a certain session key is invalidated or at least have some means to over time detect that the session is no longer valid.
Edit:
I just looked at the example in detail: I’m not sure if a logout should close all connections scoped to the user. When I’m logging out of my desktop I won’t want to disconnect my laptop at the same time. For normal usage disconnecting by session key would seem like the way to go, possibly having a way to disconnect anything linked to a user account.
Exadra37
I am new to LV, therefore I may be misunderstanding something here, but to me this approach seems to let me run an enumeration attack by changing the id in the
admin_user_id, thus letting me to get access to other admins?LostKobrakai
The session data is signed on the server, returned to the client in the html, sent back to the server and validated. So no user tampering allowed.
Exadra37
Sorry I missed that the signature of
mount/3ismount(params, session, socket)… I am feeling a bit stupid nowjosevalim
You can also disconnect just one of the sessions. All you have to do is identify the connections per session token rather than user id. That’s what I am submitting to
mix phx.gen.auth.josevalim
Here are the changes to enable this feature on top mix phx.gen.auth: Set the live_socket_id on login and disconnect on logout · dashbitco/mix_phx_gen_auth_demo@1eebcae · GitHub
It is really straight-forward and it is per session (i.e. it doesn’t disconnect all sessions, only the current one).