chad-adams
Loading of atoms which have been defined in a module's types
I have a simple struct which has a status field which can be :active, :idle, or nil. Definition looks like here:
defmodule Event do
defstruct status: nil
@type t :: %__MODULE__{
status: nil | :active | :idle
}
end
Then I have an application which parses JSON representation to create instances of these structs. As part of this, I am calling String.to_existing_atom/1. So "active" from the JSON becomes :active. However, I am getting ArgumentError from String.to_existing_atom/1 due to the atom not being loaded yet.
I have tried Jose’s solution on this github thread whereby Code.ensure_loaded?/1 is called to force loading of the module. But in this case, although the module gets loaded, the atoms here are defined in the module’s typing so it doesn’t appear to create them.
Any suggestions on a clean way to solve this?
Marked As Solved
brettbeatty
In my opinion the better alternative to String.to_existing_atom/1 is to be explicit about which values you’ll cast. For example, if you’re creating an Event struct from a string-keyed map (like parsed JSON), it could look something like this:
def new(map) do
%__MODULE__{
... # other fields
status: cast_status(map["status"])
}
end
defp cast_status("active"), do: :active
defp cast_status("idle"), do: :idle
defp cast_status(nil), do: nil
This particular example would raise if you got an unacceptable value back from the JSON. If you need to validate the input, something like Ecto changesets would do the trick too. Or if it fit your needs you could just make everything else nil.
Also Liked
NobbZ
Types and Specs are not available at runtime, and therefore have no effects like creating atoms.
You need to actually use those atoms in your code.
mudasobwa
The sole purpose of String.to_existing_atom/1 would be to raise if the atom is not existing. If you are sure that the source of string in the question is trustful, there is not much sense in using it in general, if the atom already exists, it would be used, atoms are never re-created.
So, AFAICT, this is an XY problem and the simplest although cleanest solution would be to resort to String.to_atom/1 unless you expect values to come from the outside; in that case, it’d be better to handle wrong values in a bit more sophisticated manner.
Popular in Questions
Other popular topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #elixirconf-us
- #distillery
- #processes
- #forms
- #api
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #performance
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Real-time error tracking, performance insights, and observability for devs.
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Develop your skills with books, videos, and courses.
Producing high quality Elixir screencasts since 2017.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"