augnustin
Hello,
I would like to have robots.txt empty in production, but in my staging environment that it contains:
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
Is there a way to simply achieve this?
Thanks
Trending in Questions
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
I’m very new to Elixir, so sorry if this is a silly question:
I am wondering what happens to the mailbox of a process when the machine i...
New
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates?
{Textile.render(@product.long_description)}
escapes the HTM...
New
Background
When trying to execute mix release on a Windows 11 machine for a Phoenix project I get the following error:
* assembling mark...
New
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
Is there a way to import record definitions in the iex shell for pretty printing (similar to the rr command in the erl shell)? This woul...
New
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used?
I’ve got two Github accoun...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
Hi everyone :waving_hand:
I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #code-sync
- #discussion
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #elixirconf-us
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #elixirconf-eu
- #processes
- #security
- #api
- #forms
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 8- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
kokolegorille
robots.txt is a static file pushed to web root by copy-webpack-plugin.
I think your solution is to check env in webpack, and change copy-webpack-plugin config to depend on it.
Phillipp
I would simply define a route for it and dynamically render it by environment.
augnustin
This could make sense if I need dynamic content based on app’s data (eg. excluding some route based on ids etc.) but in my case, the webpack solution shall be more accurate.
cnck1387
Another option could be to have your configuration management tool write your robots.txt file. That’s what I do in Ansible. Then I just write a different robots.txt depending on which server / environment I’m deploying to and the code for it is alongside my other environment specific settings.
Phillipp
The Webpack solution means you have to create a separate build for each environment. So if you are fine with the state on the staging system, you have to create a new build for the prod system instead of adjusting some env vars.
augnustin
What do you mean by
?
cnck1387
Certain configuration management tools allow you to have different settings for different environments. You could have your tool of choice write a robots.txt file to your staging server one way but have it different on your production server.
In other words your robots.txt file is managed by the tool you use to deploy your site instead of being part of your code repo. There’s little value in having it as part of your code repo IMO, especially since you’ll very likely want it to be different between environments.
Also in the future, if you want a dynamic robots.txt file you can either generate it on the spot with a custom Phoenix route, or have a cron job on your server generate a robots.txt file on whatever schedule you want so you can serve it with nginx or a CDN.
In all cases it doesn’t involve having a robots.txt file directly in your code repo.
sheerlox
Reviving this thread with a solution on how to achieve this behavior with a
Plug, since I haven’t been able to find an answer here or on the Fly.io forums:lib/my_app_web/plugs/robots.exlib/my_app_web/endpoint.exconfig/runtime.exsThen, create the relevant
robots-staging.txtandrobots-production.txtfiles inpriv/static/.Remember to remove the
robots.txtfrom thestatic_pathsinlib/my_app_web.ex, although this plug should load and return a response before it if you’ve added it before thePlug.Staticconfiguration.