venomnert
Many to many relationship
Context:
A customer_lead can be associated to many service_category. A service_category can be associated to many customer_leads.
customerleads_service migration
create table(:customerlead_service) do
add :service_category_id, references("service_categories")
add :customer_lead_id, references("customer_leads")
timestamps()
end
customer_service schema
schema "customerlead_service" do
belongs_to :customer_leads, CustomerLead
belongs_to :service_categories, ServiceCategory
timestamps()
end
customer migration
create table(:customer_leads) do
add :first_name, :string
add :last_name, :string
add :email, :string
add :address, :string
add :phone_number, :string
add :company_name, :string
add :message, :string
add :status, :boolean, null: false, default: false
timestamps()
end
customer schema
schema "customer_leads" do
field :first_name, :string
field :last_name, :string
field :email, :string
field :address, :string
field :phone_number, :string
field :company_name, :string
field :message, :string
field :status, :boolean
many_to_many :service_categories, ServiceCategory,
join_through: CustomerleadService
timestamps()
end
def changeset(customer, attrs \\ %{}) do
customer
|> cast(attrs, @required_fields ++ @optional_fields)
|> validate_required(@required_fields)
end
def add_service_to_customer_lead(changeset, attrs) do
service = Ramlaw.Services.get_service_category_by([slug: attrs["services"]])
|> Repo.preload(:customer_leads)
changeset
|> Repo.preload(:service_categories)
|> Ecto.Changeset.change()
|> Ecto.Changeset.put_assoc(:service_categories, [service])
|> Repo.update!()
end
service migration
create table(:service_categories) do
add :title, :string
add :slug, :string
add :status, :boolean, null: false, default: false
timestamps()
end
service schema
schema "service_categories" do
field :title, :string
field :slug, :string
field :status, :boolean
has_many :services, Service,
on_delete: :delete_all,
foreign_key: :service_categories_id,
on_replace: :nilify
many_to_many :customer_leads, CustomerLead,
join_through: CustomerleadService
timestamps()
end
The problem
In my test I noticed when I first create a customer_lead, the service_category get’s associated properly
AFTER INSERT: %Ramlaw.Schema.CustomerLead{
__meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "customer_leads">,
address: nil,
company_name: "profilo",
email: "venomnert1994@hotmail.com",
first_name: "Nert",
id: 4,
inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
last_name: "test",
message: "fdafsa",
phone_number: "6473355012",
service_categories: [
%Ramlaw.Schema.ServiceCategory{
__meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "service_categories">,
customer_leads: [],
id: 10,
inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
services: #Ecto.Association.NotLoaded<association :services is not loaded>,
slug: "family-law",
status: false,
title: "Family Law",
updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
}
],
status: nil,
updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
}
However, when I query the same customer_lead that was added, its service_category is empty. Also this applies to the associated service_category as well.
Code snippet
service_cat
|> Repo.preload(:customer_leads)
|> IO.inspect(label: "RESULTS")
ClientLeads.get_client_lead(added_client.id)
|> IO.inspect(label: "TEST")
result
RESULTS: %Ramlaw.Schema.ServiceCategory{
__meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "service_categories">,
customer_leads: [],
id: 10,
inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
services: #Ecto.Association.NotLoaded<association :services is not loaded>,
slug: "family-law",
status: nil,
title: "Family Law",
updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
}
TEST: %Ramlaw.Schema.CustomerLead{
__meta__: #Ecto.Schema.Metadata<:loaded, "customer_leads">,
address: nil,
company_name: "profilo",
email: "venomnert1994@hotmail.com",
first_name: "Nert",
id: 4,
inserted_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z],
last_name: "test",
message: "fdafsa",
phone_number: "6473355012",
service_categories: [],
status: false,
updated_at: ~U[2019-11-10 13:23:06Z]
}
I feel like I have set up everything correctly regarding the many-to-many association; however, i’m not able to retrieve the associations.
Most Liked
csisnett
timestamps() don’t work when you create an intermediary record like that. You have to create a new record independently by passing the parents tables IDs as attributes. The problem I’ve had with the update syntax as shown in the elixir school article is that you’re replacing all intermediary records customer_lead_services with those specific customer_lead_id and service_categories_id, so it’s not the best option to use the syntax if you want to continue to add intermediary records afterward.
venomnert
If anyone else runs into this issue, the solution is to remove schema for the joining table customer_service schema.
And update your schema to the following, which is to remove the timestamp:
customerleads_service migration
create table(:customerlead_service) do
add :service_category_id, references("service_categories")
add :customer_lead_id, references("customer_leads")
end
However, I’m not sure as to why the schema was causing this issue though.
Also this post at ElixirSchool definitely helped:
csisnett
Sure no problem @venomnert,
you would need a changeset function for the customerlead_service schema as well.
def changeset(customerlead_service, attrs) do
customerlead_service
|> cast(attrs, [:customer_leads_id, :service_categories_id])
|> validate_required([:customer_leads_id, :service_categories_id])
end
To create the record you would need the parent tables to be created already
customer_lead = %CustomerLead{...}
service_category = %ServiceCategory{...}
attrs = %{"customer_leads_id" => customerlead.id, "service_categories_id" => service_category.id}
and call this function (which should be in your Context) passing attrs
def create_customerlead_service(attrs = %{}) do
%CustomerLeadService{}
|> CustomerLeadService.changeset(attrs)
|> Repo.insert()
end
Not relevant to the question but I would change field names in the customerlead_service schema from :customer_leads and :service_categories to :customer_lead and service_category as you’re only referring to one and not several in the intermediary table.
Popular in Questions
Other popular topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #elixirconf-us
- #distillery
- #processes
- #forms
- #api
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #performance








