archan937

archan937

MecksUnit: Elegantly mock module functions in (async) ExUnit tests

It is a well-know topic within the Elixir community: “To mock or not to mock? :)”

Every alchemist probably has his / her own opinion concerning this topic. José Valim and Plataformatec has published the Hex package Mox which complies with his article on mocking in Elixir.

Personally, I’m not convinced in having to change the code “in service of” testing certain modules. Why would one add abstraction to code of which its purpose isn’t supposed to be interchangeable (with mock modules for instance)?

After some Googling, I found Espec of which I thought that that’s a little bit too much. Finally, I found Mock which could have done the job. But there are two downsides:

  1. You cannot use async: true
  2. Defining the mock functions could have been done in a more readable way

Based on that, I decided to write MecksUnit which solves just that. An example:

defmodule Foo do
  def trim(string) do
    String.trim(string)
  end
end

defmodule MecksUnitTest do
  use ExUnit.Case, async: true
  use MecksUnit.Case

  defmock String do
    def trim("  Paul  "), do: "Engel"
    def trim("  Foo  ", "!"), do: "Bar"
    def trim(_, "!"), do: {:passthrough, ["  Surprise!  !!!!", "!"]}
    def trim(_, _), do: :passthrough
  end

  defmock List do
    def wrap(:foo), do: [1, 2, 3, 4]
  end

  mocked_test "using mocked module functions" do
    task =
      Task.async(fn ->
        assert "Engel" == String.trim("  Paul  ")
        assert "Engel" == Foo.trim("  Paul  ")
        assert "Bar" == String.trim("  Foo  ", "!")
        assert "  Surprise!  " == String.trim("  Paul  ", "!")
        assert "MecksUnit" == String.trim("  MecksUnit  ")
        assert "Paul Engel" == String.trim("  Paul Engel  ", " ")
        assert [1, 2, 3, 4] == List.wrap(:foo)
        assert [] == List.wrap(nil)
        assert [:bar] == List.wrap(:bar)
        assert [:foo, :bar] == List.wrap([:foo, :bar])
      end)

    Task.await(task)
  end

  test "using the original module functions" do
    task =
      Task.async(fn ->
        assert "Paul" == String.trim("  Paul  ")
        assert "Paul" == Foo.trim("  Paul  ")
        assert "  Foo  " == String.trim("  Foo  ", "!")
        assert "  Paul  " == String.trim("  Paul  ", "!")
        assert "MecksUnit" == String.trim("  MecksUnit  ")
        assert "Paul Engel" == String.trim("  Paul Engel  ", " ")
        assert [:foo] == List.wrap(:foo)
        assert [] == List.wrap(nil)
        assert [:bar] == List.wrap(:bar)
        assert [:foo, :bar] == List.wrap([:foo, :bar])
      end)

    Task.await(task)
  end

  defmock String do
    def trim("  Paul  "), do: "PAUL :)"
  end

  defmock List do
    def wrap([1, 2, 3, 4]), do: [5, 6, 7, 8]
    def wrap(nil), do: ~w(Surprise)
  end

  mocked_test "using different mocked module functions" do
    task =
      Task.async(fn ->
        assert "PAUL :)" == String.trim("  Paul  ")
        assert "PAUL :)" == Foo.trim("  Paul  ")
        assert "  Foo  " == String.trim("  Foo  ", "!")
        assert "  Paul  " == String.trim("  Paul  ", "!")
        assert "MecksUnit" == String.trim("  MecksUnit  ")
        assert "Paul Engel" == String.trim("  Paul Engel  ", " ")
        assert [:foo] == List.wrap(:foo)
        assert ["Surprise"] == List.wrap(nil)
        assert [:bar] == List.wrap(:bar)
        assert [:foo, :bar] == List.wrap([:foo, :bar])
        assert [5, 6, 7, 8] == List.wrap([1, 2, 3, 4])
      end)

    Task.await(task)
  end
end

Mocking module functions is pretty straightforward and done as follows:

  1. Add use MecksUnit.Case at the beginning of your test file
  2. Use defmock as if you would define the original module with defmodule containing mocked functions
  3. Use mocked_test as if you would define a normal ExUnit test after having defined all the required mock modules

The defined mock modules only apply to the first mocked_test encountered. So they are isolated (despite of :meck having an unfortunate global effect ) as MecksUnit takes care of it. Also, non-matching function heads within the mock module will result in invoking the original module function as well. And last but not least: you can just run the tests asynchronously .

Enjoy using MecksUnit (if you prefer unobtrusive mocking). A Github star is very welcome, haha :wink:

Most Liked

archan937

archan937

Just released MecksUnit v0.1.4 :slight_smile:

archan937

archan937

MecksUnit v0.1.3 is out. It includes the fix for :meck related compile errors which often occurred when mocking within multiple files

sztosz

sztosz

I don’t know what happened but since 1.3 mocked_test fail with same defmock do block. Instead of mocking it’s passing through function.
Nevermind, I forgot to do MecksUnit.mock() Working like a charm :+1:

Where Next?

Popular in Announcing Top

wmnnd
Hi there, for my project DBLSQD, I needed a file storage solution that is a bit more flexible than Arc. Because I thought others might f...
New
mischov
import Meeseeks.CSS html = HTTPoison.get!("https://news.ycombinator.com/").body for story <- Meeseeks.all(html, css("tr.athing")) do...
New
dominicletz
Hi, I thought I had posted my library before but seems I hadn’t. The project is still in early stages but it’s growing and so I think it...
New
tfwright
After working on it for a couple of months and using it in production for most of that time, today I’ve released LiveAdmin, a LiveView ba...
New
bryanjos
Hi, I wanted share a small library we at Revelry Labs made for rendering react components from the server side. There are instructions fo...
New
zorbash
I created Kitto a framework for dashboards inspired by Dashing. The distributed characteristics of Elixir and the low memory footprint...
New
Azolo
Hey everyone, I just released WebSockex which is a Elixir WebSocket client. WebSockex strives to work as a OTP special process, be RFC6...
New
scohen
Lexical Lexical is a next-generation language server for the Elixir programming language. Features Context aware code completion As-you...
New
tmbb
I’ve decided to create this topic to discuss optimization possibilities for something like Phoenix LiveView. I’ve created this topic unde...
144 10187 141
New
pkrawat1
Hey guyz We at @aviabird are working on a payment library in elixir/phoenix. We are targeting March 2018 to add 56 Gateways to it. Have...
New

Other popular topics Top

senggen
Erlang/OTP 25 [erts-13.2.2] [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [ds:8:8:10] [async-threads:1] 15:22:35.803 [error] gen_event {lager_file_backend...
New
skosch
To my knowledge, put_in, Map.update etc. all have the one limitation of not automatically creating intermediate keys when needed (for exa...
New
Nvim
Anybody knows a comprehensive comparison of Django and Phoenix, thanks for the help. Where are they similar? Where do they differ the m...
New
JeremM34
Hello, how can I check the Phoenix version ? Thanks !
New
josevalim
Hi everyone, One of the features added to Elixir early on to help integration with Erlang code was the idea of overridable function defi...
New
vegabook
I’m brand new to Phoenix and I have stripped one of the demo applications to the bone. I just want to get an svg up on the screen. Here i...
New
pmjoe
I have a relationship of love and hate with Elixir. Lots of things are just absolutely right, but there are some things that are kind of ...
New
vrod
I am using the Starship cross-shell prompt – it seems pretty nice, but I get some errors: [WARN] - (starship::utils): Executing command ...
New
nsuchy
Hi. I’ve noticed that Windows Powershell has it’s own IEX command and you cannot access Elixir’s IEX due to the conflict. This isn’t a cr...
New
AstonJ
Seen any cool LiveView demos, sample apps or examples? Please post them here! :003:
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement