docjazither
Hi OGs,
I have a function as follow:
defp comparing_statuses(duplicates) do
statuses = count_duplicates_statuses(duplicates)
case statuses do
{"one", _, "zero", _, _, _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "approved")
{"one", _, "one", _, _, _} ->
deleting_approached_and_approved_case(duplicates)
{"two or more", _, "zero", _, _, _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "approved")
{"zero", "one", _, _, _, _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, [
"invalid",
"under_investigation",
"suspended"
])
{"zero", "two or more", _, _, _, _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, [
"invalid",
"under_investigation",
"suspended"
])
{"zero", "zero", "one", _, _, "zero"} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "approached")
{"zero", "zero", "one", _, _, "one"} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_update(
duplicates,
"approval_requested",
"approved"
)
{"zero", "zero", "two or more", _, _, "two or more"} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "approval_requested")
{"zero", "zero", "two or more", _, _, "zero"} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "approached")
handle_or_email_deletion_check(duplicates)
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "one", _, _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "rejected")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "two or more", _, _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "rejected")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "one", _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "external")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "two or more", _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "external")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "two or more"} ->
mass_deletion_check(duplicates)
end
end
And mix credo complains me that function is too complex (CC is 15, max is 9)
I can not break the switch case into two functions, as one function can throw an error stating that pattern is not recognised
Any ideas ?
Thank you
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Hello,
I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex











Marked As Solved- Show Best Posts
- Show All Posts (oldest first)
- Show All Posts (newest first)
msimonborg
use multiple function heads
Also Liked
bmitc
I personally would just disable the Credo check, which I have done in other projects because of this. I find the multiple function clause approach too verbose in cases like this. It increases the footprint of the function with exactly duplicated information and text. In this case, the
casereturns are short and simple, and I would prefercaseover the function clause approach here.msimonborg
It’s a fair point. I read the question as “how do I re-write this”, not “how do I silence this”. Since the compiler treats the
caseand the multiple function clauses more or less the same way, to me this is the natural way to rewrite the code and make credo happy without touching config. What if the OP’s company requires that credo pass all checks and disabling is not allowed?Personally, I do find the multiple function approach more readable, but it is all a matter of preference.