docjazither
Hi OGs,
I have a function as follow:
defp comparing_statuses(duplicates) do
statuses = count_duplicates_statuses(duplicates)
case statuses do
{"one", _, "zero", _, _, _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "approved")
{"one", _, "one", _, _, _} ->
deleting_approached_and_approved_case(duplicates)
{"two or more", _, "zero", _, _, _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "approved")
{"zero", "one", _, _, _, _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, [
"invalid",
"under_investigation",
"suspended"
])
{"zero", "two or more", _, _, _, _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, [
"invalid",
"under_investigation",
"suspended"
])
{"zero", "zero", "one", _, _, "zero"} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "approached")
{"zero", "zero", "one", _, _, "one"} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_update(
duplicates,
"approval_requested",
"approved"
)
{"zero", "zero", "two or more", _, _, "two or more"} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "approval_requested")
{"zero", "zero", "two or more", _, _, "zero"} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "approached")
handle_or_email_deletion_check(duplicates)
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "one", _, _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "rejected")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "two or more", _, _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "rejected")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "one", _} ->
iterate_through_duplicates_with_status_and_remove(duplicates, "external")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "two or more", _} ->
accumulating_required_status(duplicates, "external")
{"zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "zero", "two or more"} ->
mass_deletion_check(duplicates)
end
end
And mix credo complains me that function is too complex (CC is 15, max is 9)
I can not break the switch case into two functions, as one function can throw an error stating that pattern is not recognised
Any ideas ?
Thank you
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Is there any way to avoid the Hologram compiler running when using iex? It seems like the front-end code could potentially be disregarded...
New
** (ArgumentError) expected :max_attempts to be a positive integer, got: {:@, [line: 10, column: 19], [{:max_attempts, [line: 10, column:...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
msimonborg
use multiple function heads
bmitc
I personally would just disable the Credo check, which I have done in other projects because of this. I find the multiple function clause approach too verbose in cases like this. It increases the footprint of the function with exactly duplicated information and text. In this case, the
casereturns are short and simple, and I would prefercaseover the function clause approach here.msimonborg
It’s a fair point. I read the question as “how do I re-write this”, not “how do I silence this”. Since the compiler treats the
caseand the multiple function clauses more or less the same way, to me this is the natural way to rewrite the code and make credo happy without touching config. What if the OP’s company requires that credo pass all checks and disabling is not allowed?Personally, I do find the multiple function approach more readable, but it is all a matter of preference.