wceolin

wceolin

I’m using Mox to mock some modules in my app. Usually, it works fine but I have a function that I’m calling inside FLAME.call/2 and it broke my mock:

FLAME.call(Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization, fn ->
  Zoonk.Storage.optimize!(key, args["size"] || 500)
end)

After I added it to FLAME.call/2, I started getting the following error:

** (Mox.UnexpectedCallError) no expectation defined for Zoonk.Storage.StorageAPIMock.optimize!/2 in process #PID<0.5593.0> with args ["16.png", 500]
             (mox 1.1.0) lib/mox.ex:820: Mox.__dispatch__/4
             (zoonk 0.1.0) lib/storage/storage_context.ex:177: Zoonk.Storage.optimize!/2
             (flame 0.2.0) lib/flame/runner.ex:431: anonymous fn/3 in FLAME.Runner.remote_call/4

I’ve tried calling Mox.allow/3 in test_helper.ex but it didn’t work:

Mox.allow(Zoonk.Storage.StorageAPIMock, self(), fn ->
 GenServer.whereis(Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization)
end)

Any ideas how to make it work inside FLAME.call/2? Thanks!

Showing Posts 1 to 4

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization is the name of the FLAME.Pool process that manages runners. It receives a :checkout message and returns the actual PID of the runner, which is what you’d need to share the mock with.

wceolin

wceolin OP

Thanks for the pointer but I’m not sure I understood it (sorry, I’m very new to Elixir). It looks like:

  • FLAME.Pool is the process that manages runners. That’s the process I need.
  • It receives :checkout messages that returns the PID I need.
  • The code you linked suggests this is happening on the checkout_runner function, which is called on the handle_call callback.

Do I need to listen to a callback somewhere? Doing some GPT-driven research, it suggests I need to call GenServer.call(:flame_pool, :checkout) but that doesn’t seem to return the correct PID. GPT isn’t very good with Elixir, unfortunately.

I know I can probably use set_mox_global (that seems to be what the FLAME codebase is using) but I’d love to understand how this actually works because I feel a bit lost here.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

There are three processes involved here:

  • the test process, that’s calling Mox functions and the code-under-test
  • a process running with callbacks defined in the module FLAME.Pool, named Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization
  • a runner process, that ultimately tries to call Zoonk.Storage.optimize!

The Mox.allow you posted in the original post is sharing the mock with the second process, but it’s actually needed in the third.


FLAME.call “checks out” a runner and then sends it work; doing a checkout outside of that will return a different runner process from the pool, so that won’t help.


Your options, IMO, are:

  • use Mox globally (with the corresponding loss of concurrency)
  • change your architecture slightly: consider wrapping the FLAME.call in a function and using Mox to replace that. Then, test the code inside the FLAME.call separately.
wceolin

wceolin OP

I see, thanks. I thought there was a way to get the PID of that third process to use with Mox.allow.

I was trying to avoid running tests synchronously. In my initial tests, the runtime doubled from 3s to 6s, but moving those sync tests to a separate module brought it back to 3s. It seems like the best option for now.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews