wceolin

wceolin

I’m using Mox to mock some modules in my app. Usually, it works fine but I have a function that I’m calling inside FLAME.call/2 and it broke my mock:

FLAME.call(Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization, fn ->
  Zoonk.Storage.optimize!(key, args["size"] || 500)
end)

After I added it to FLAME.call/2, I started getting the following error:

** (Mox.UnexpectedCallError) no expectation defined for Zoonk.Storage.StorageAPIMock.optimize!/2 in process #PID<0.5593.0> with args ["16.png", 500]
             (mox 1.1.0) lib/mox.ex:820: Mox.__dispatch__/4
             (zoonk 0.1.0) lib/storage/storage_context.ex:177: Zoonk.Storage.optimize!/2
             (flame 0.2.0) lib/flame/runner.ex:431: anonymous fn/3 in FLAME.Runner.remote_call/4

I’ve tried calling Mox.allow/3 in test_helper.ex but it didn’t work:

Mox.allow(Zoonk.Storage.StorageAPIMock, self(), fn ->
 GenServer.whereis(Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization)
end)

Any ideas how to make it work inside FLAME.call/2? Thanks!

Showing Posts 1 to 4

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization is the name of the FLAME.Pool process that manages runners. It receives a :checkout message and returns the actual PID of the runner, which is what you’d need to share the mock with.

wceolin

wceolin OP

Thanks for the pointer but I’m not sure I understood it (sorry, I’m very new to Elixir). It looks like:

  • FLAME.Pool is the process that manages runners. That’s the process I need.
  • It receives :checkout messages that returns the PID I need.
  • The code you linked suggests this is happening on the checkout_runner function, which is called on the handle_call callback.

Do I need to listen to a callback somewhere? Doing some GPT-driven research, it suggests I need to call GenServer.call(:flame_pool, :checkout) but that doesn’t seem to return the correct PID. GPT isn’t very good with Elixir, unfortunately.

I know I can probably use set_mox_global (that seems to be what the FLAME codebase is using) but I’d love to understand how this actually works because I feel a bit lost here.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

There are three processes involved here:

  • the test process, that’s calling Mox functions and the code-under-test
  • a process running with callbacks defined in the module FLAME.Pool, named Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization
  • a runner process, that ultimately tries to call Zoonk.Storage.optimize!

The Mox.allow you posted in the original post is sharing the mock with the second process, but it’s actually needed in the third.


FLAME.call “checks out” a runner and then sends it work; doing a checkout outside of that will return a different runner process from the pool, so that won’t help.


Your options, IMO, are:

  • use Mox globally (with the corresponding loss of concurrency)
  • change your architecture slightly: consider wrapping the FLAME.call in a function and using Mox to replace that. Then, test the code inside the FLAME.call separately.
wceolin

wceolin OP

I see, thanks. I thought there was a way to get the PID of that third process to use with Mox.allow.

I was trying to avoid running tests synchronously. In my initial tests, the runtime doubled from 3s to 6s, but moving those sync tests to a separate module brought it back to 3s. It seems like the best option for now.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
pragdave
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates? {Textile.render(@product.long_description)} escapes the HTM...
New
rlipscombe
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
rlipscombe
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used? I’ve got two Github accoun...
New
adr
Hello all. I have a question as to best practices for code organization when implementing a liveview with a lot of responsibilities. Sup...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews