wceolin

wceolin

I’m using Mox to mock some modules in my app. Usually, it works fine but I have a function that I’m calling inside FLAME.call/2 and it broke my mock:

FLAME.call(Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization, fn ->
  Zoonk.Storage.optimize!(key, args["size"] || 500)
end)

After I added it to FLAME.call/2, I started getting the following error:

** (Mox.UnexpectedCallError) no expectation defined for Zoonk.Storage.StorageAPIMock.optimize!/2 in process #PID<0.5593.0> with args ["16.png", 500]
             (mox 1.1.0) lib/mox.ex:820: Mox.__dispatch__/4
             (zoonk 0.1.0) lib/storage/storage_context.ex:177: Zoonk.Storage.optimize!/2
             (flame 0.2.0) lib/flame/runner.ex:431: anonymous fn/3 in FLAME.Runner.remote_call/4

I’ve tried calling Mox.allow/3 in test_helper.ex but it didn’t work:

Mox.allow(Zoonk.Storage.StorageAPIMock, self(), fn ->
 GenServer.whereis(Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization)
end)

Any ideas how to make it work inside FLAME.call/2? Thanks!

Showing Posts 1 to 4

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization is the name of the FLAME.Pool process that manages runners. It receives a :checkout message and returns the actual PID of the runner, which is what you’d need to share the mock with.

wceolin

wceolin OP

Thanks for the pointer but I’m not sure I understood it (sorry, I’m very new to Elixir). It looks like:

  • FLAME.Pool is the process that manages runners. That’s the process I need.
  • It receives :checkout messages that returns the PID I need.
  • The code you linked suggests this is happening on the checkout_runner function, which is called on the handle_call callback.

Do I need to listen to a callback somewhere? Doing some GPT-driven research, it suggests I need to call GenServer.call(:flame_pool, :checkout) but that doesn’t seem to return the correct PID. GPT isn’t very good with Elixir, unfortunately.

I know I can probably use set_mox_global (that seems to be what the FLAME codebase is using) but I’d love to understand how this actually works because I feel a bit lost here.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

There are three processes involved here:

  • the test process, that’s calling Mox functions and the code-under-test
  • a process running with callbacks defined in the module FLAME.Pool, named Zoonk.FLAME.ImageOptimization
  • a runner process, that ultimately tries to call Zoonk.Storage.optimize!

The Mox.allow you posted in the original post is sharing the mock with the second process, but it’s actually needed in the third.


FLAME.call “checks out” a runner and then sends it work; doing a checkout outside of that will return a different runner process from the pool, so that won’t help.


Your options, IMO, are:

  • use Mox globally (with the corresponding loss of concurrency)
  • change your architecture slightly: consider wrapping the FLAME.call in a function and using Mox to replace that. Then, test the code inside the FLAME.call separately.
wceolin

wceolin OP

I see, thanks. I thought there was a way to get the PID of that third process to use with Mox.allow.

I was trying to avoid running tests synchronously. In my initial tests, the runtime doubled from 3s to 6s, but moving those sync tests to a separate module brought it back to 3s. It seems like the best option for now.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews