hauleth
Currently Phoenix generates configuration for Ecto in the config/config.exs (I mean option :ecto_repos). Why there? Instead of polluting config.exs (and by extension sys.config) with needless configuration options I believe it would be better to use application env instead. For these unaware of this feature, you can specify “global” configuration within application/0 callback in Mix.Project, ex.:
defmodule MyProject.Mixfile do
use Mix.Project
# …
def application do
[
mod: {MyProject.Application, []},
extra_applications: [:logger],
env: [
ecto_repos: [MyProject.Repo]
]
]
end
# …
end
This will keep only runtime configuration (this option is used almost exclusively in development and testing) in config/config.exs and will not pollute sys.config in the result.
Trending in Discussions
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
New
I want to open this thread for you all to discuss and help those who really like Ash but are still hesitant to use it in a real project. ...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
I’m posting this in response to Jose’s recent tweet (Cr. link) :
People are sleeping on Elixir for a coding harness:
Hot-code swappi...
New
It would be helpful to have a list of companies worldwide that hire engineers without prior experience in Elixir. Often, it can be quite ...
New
Anyone running long-lived stateful processes on BEAM? We’re building an AI agent runtime and would love to compare notes.
We’re a small ...
New
This might be a bit disturbing for some but it’s happening - computers running on living human neurons. They’ve made them smart enough t...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
dimitarvp
I would love it if we could do that for every dependency!
We can also have mini functions like this:
It would be damn beautiful.
hauleth
This would bring no improvement over
config/config.exsas such options would still need to land in thesys.config(as you should not edit other applicationsapp.srcfiles). What would be more helpful would be allowing to define separate config file that would be loaded only at compile time. Alternatively provide something to define “compile time options” so instead of setting compile time options inconfig/config.exswe could configure it somewhere else and access it for example viaModule.compile_env/1-3or similar.dimitarvp
I’m not entirely sure what’s your pet peeve against more config landing in
sys.config. I mostly agree with it but I don’t see it as fatal.My main point is: have dedicated places for config.
For newcomers to your project (or to Elixir itself) it is mighty confusing to have to discover 7-10 source code files containing configuration which can by anywhere in the tree.
Config in a dedicated directory and nowhere else would be a strong quality of life improvement.
Keeping things simple is a disappearing ancient art, it seems.
hauleth
The reason is that after some time I come to liking
sys.configand in my deployments I could use this directly instead of using additional tools like config providers. But it become troublesome when this file grows larger and larger for no apparent reason.What I mean is exactly that - have one config file, but keep only runtime configuration there. How often you edit
:ecto_repos? This is configuration option needed only formix ecto.*tasks and is used by anything else, so why the hell it is inconfig/config.exsat all? This option do not configure my application in any way, only tooling, and to be exact - mostly development tooling, as often you do not havemixin production.And that is what I am trying to achieve there - hide unneeded entries from users and keep configuration files as simple and short as possible, do not bloat them with compile time and tooling configuration that has nothing to do with my application behaviour.