hudsonbay

hudsonbay

I’m in a situation where I have to insert 9000 registries in bulk into the database with Ecto in PostgreSQL.

I already have a dedicated function for inserting an array of elements BulkOperations.bulk_create(MyStruct, list). It’s basically an Ecto.Multi, so everything in the list must be inserted because it’s a transaction.

No problem with that. If I insert a list of 10 elements everything’s OK. But if the list has 9000 registries we have a problem, because I receive a timeout when the connection stays open for more than 15000 ms doing the operations. I mean, 9000 registries :exploding_head:, it takes a lot.

Now, I decided to separate everything by chunks. Like this:

        total_rows_affected =
          list
          |> Enum.chunk_every(20)
          |> Enum.map(&BulkOperations.bulk_create(MyStruct, &1))
          |> Enum.reduce(0, fn %{rows_affected: rows_affected}, acc ->
            rows_affected + acc
          end)

        %{errors: [], rows_affected: total_rows_affected}

It works for for 9000 registries.

But I feel it’s not secure because if I insert a chunk of elements with &BulkOperations.bulk_create(MyStruct, &1) and that operation is not succesful (because of a database key conflict maybe) then I have a problem because some operations will fail and some others don’t.

My solution was to create a transaction, so everything has to be successful. Like this:

    {:ok, result} =
      Repo.transaction(fn ->
        total_rows_affected =
          list
          |> Enum.chunk_every(10)
          |> Enum.map(&BulkOperations.bulk_create(MyStruct, &1))
          |> Enum.reduce(0, fn %{rows_affected: rows_affected}, acc ->
            rows_affected + acc
          end)

        %{errors: [], rows_affected: total_rows_affected}
      end)

    result

And it works but I receive a timeout when I try to insert 9000 registries because I believe everything is using the same connection opened by Repo.transaction.

So, my question is, how can I insert all of this 9000 registries but making sure that everything is inserted?

Showing Posts 1 to 10

RudManusachi

RudManusachi

Have you tried to pass timeout: :infinity option to Repo.insert_all/3 or Repo.transaction/2?

hudsonbay

hudsonbay OP

No, I haven’t. Because I’m worried that if I do that I could overload the server’s memory were the database is hosted. Because it’s too much to insert. Too much work

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

Are you using insert_all? If you’re not then you could get a speed up that way.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Why don’t you try before it so you know for sure?

odix67

odix67

I think Jason’s proposal is the best option, btw. honestly, I don’t know of any database that can span a transaction across multiple connections, but I can be wrong.

hudsonbay

hudsonbay OP

Actually, no. I’m not using an insert_all function. It’s a Ecto.Multi.insert one when calling BulkOperations.bulk_create/2

This is what I did following your advices

{:ok, result} =
    Repo.transaction(fn ->
      total_rows_affected =
        list
        |> Enum.chunk_every(10)
        |> Enum.map(&BulkOperations.bulk_create(MyStruct, &1))
        |> Enum.reduce(0, fn %{rows_affected: rows_affected}, acc ->
          rows_affected + acc
        end)

      %{errors: [], rows_affected: total_rows_affected}
    end, [{:timeout, :infinity}])   # <============= this is what I added

  result

But I received :

"2021-12-13 19:29:43.254 UTC [1299724]: [1-1] db=my_db,user=postgres LOG:  unexpected EOF on client connection with an open transaction"

I don’t know why the client(Phoenix) is closing the connection because I set this to :infinity

I also did it this way: timeout: :infinity and Phoenix is closing the connection after some time

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

What does bulk_create do exactly?

hudsonbay

hudsonbay OP

@dimitarvp it was inserting one by one. I changed it with the help of a friend and it worked. insert_all does the job as @axelson was saying. Now it looks like this:

def bulk_create(entity, items) do
    Ecto.Multi.new()
    |> Ecto.Multi.insert_all(:insert_all, entity, items, on_conflict: :nothing)
    |> Repo.transaction()
    |> case do
      {:ok, _} ->
        %{rows_affected: length(items), errors: []}

      {
        :error,
        _,
        %Ecto.Changeset{
          changes: changes,
          errors: errors
        },
        _
      } ->
        %{
          rows_affected: 0,
          errors: "Changes #{changes} couldn't be created because #{inspect(errors)}"
        }
    end
  end

But the problem is that I had to take care of timestamps because insert_all doesn’t insert them. So a migration to set a default value of now() solves the issue.

So, issue solved but I still won’t know why it was closing the connection even when I set the timeout to :infinity with the previous function. BTW, now with the insert_all solution I can stick to the default timeout of 15_000ms

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

If memory serves, the second element in the :ok tuple should already contain the number of items affected.

hudsonbay

hudsonbay OP

Yes, but as it’s a transaction, all of the initial items in the list should be affected. That’s why I used items param with length(items). Makes sense to you now? Thanks for noticing that, BTW

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews