cevado
I’m curious to know if there is any reason for not allowing named anonymous functions in elixir as it’s possible in erlang. I’ve looked up here and at elixir mailing list and didn’t find discussions on that matter.
Erlang would allow me to do something like that:
fun Sum(T, 0) ->
T
Sum(T, N) ->
Sum(T + N, N - 1)
end
while in elixir, to get something similar, I’d need to pass the function as a parameter.
fn
_f, s, 0 -> s
f, s, n -> f.(s + n, n - 1)
end
since it’s something available in Erlang, is there a reason to not allow the same thing in elixir?
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #elixirconf-eu
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
OvermindDL1
I’m pretty sure from long ago I remember it being talked about it being for backwards compat issues, specifically that Elixir’s minimum OTP version didn’t support it yet. I wonder if that’s still the case. Anyone happen to know what the minimum OTP version for Elixir is nowadays and what is the minimum OTP version that named anonymous functions are supported?
cevado
So, named anonymous functions were available in otp 17 afaik.
And elixir 1.13 supports otp 22 to 24.
OvermindDL1
So it sounds like someone should start the proposal! ^.^
*hint*hint*
hauleth
I believe there were proposals for that, but all were turned down, as these do not really make sense in Elixir. Erlang added named lambdas for sole purpose of being able to define recursive functions in shell. This is not a problem in Elixir shell, as you can define whole module from there with ease.
However, if you really want, then you can achieve that with some black-magic macros:
cevado
Do you remember if the discussions were in this forum or in the mailing list?
I’d like to go understand the reasons why it was rejected.
Kabie
I did a little experimental back then. A bit hacky but somehow works.
https://github.com/Kabie/named_fn