yolo007wizard

yolo007wizard

Problem Statement:

I am trying to build an ‘action runner’ for judge json rules. In a nut shell, say a json defined rule matches with action string:

{
...rule
    "action": "collect_signature"
}

I’m trying to think of best architecture to run that ‘collect_signature’ code. It could be a module name or a script file. The intention is for rules to trigger actions in a dynamic way so actions are easy to maintain separately.

Desired Requirements:

  • the action code has its own dependencies/hex packages
  • adding new actions does not require app reload/recompile/redeploy of the ‘action runner’ i.e. the actions are dynamically loaded and run somehow.

Idea 1:

standalone exs scripts - Actions are defined in standalone exs files with their own Mix.installs. I tried this already by using Code.require_file/1 to dynamically run an exs file however ran into dependency errors. The ‘action runner’ runtime dependencies had conflicts with the loaded exs dependencies. Need a way to get around that. This seems the most promising however.

Idea 2:

Umbrella project where each action is a separate application. I don’t have experience with umbrella projects but this might be a feasible path. It seems a bit overkill however and I think the action runner would have to be reloaded every time a new action is created (which is a big con).

Idea 3:

Similar to umbrella, load actions as private local packages via a dependency path. The ‘action runner’ would then dynamically load dependencies in its mix.exs. Sudo code like:

defp deps do
    for each action_name in actions folder return:
        {:action_name, ">= 0.0.0", path: "/actions/action_name"}
end

Then maybe add a Mix task ‘new action’ that loads up the boiler plate for a new action in the correct folder. The main con with this is same as #2 - the action runner would have to be recompiled with every new action.

Showing Posts 1 to 10

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

Or you can do what Livebook does. Use a separate BEAM node.

yolo007wizard

yolo007wizard OP

Ok cool I tried that out and still getting dependency errors. Do nodes have their own isolated dependencies?

I have a simple test setup. A file called ‘action_test.exs’ contains:

Mix.install([
  {:req, "~> 0.4.1"}
])

Req.get!("https://hex.pm/api/packages/req").body["meta"]["description"]
|> IO.inspect()

Then from the ‘acion runner’ I have tried:

Code.require_file(Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.exs")

and

Node.spawn(:node1@localhost, Code.require_file(Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.exs")))

but getting error:

** (Mix.Error) Mix.install/2 can only be called with the same dependencies in the given VM
(mix 1.15.2) lib/mix.ex:577: Mix.raise/2

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Not sure if it’s the problem, but note that Node.spawn expects a function as its second argument and you’re trying to pass the result of Code.require_file there instead. Maybe you need a wrapping fn -> ... end?

yolo007wizard

yolo007wizard OP

ah nice catch. I retried with:

Node.spawn(:node1@localhost, fn -> Code.require_file(Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.exs")) end)

And its running now but with a warning:
** Can not start :erlang::apply,[function<43.125776118/0 in :erl_eval.expr/6>, ] on :node1@localhost **

In order to see output I tweaked action_test.exs to be:

Mix.install([
  {:req, "~> 0.4.1"}
])

msg = Req.get!("https://hex.pm/api/packages/req").body["meta"]["description"]

File.write(Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.txt"), msg)

After re-running

Node.spawn(:node1@localhost, fn -> Code.require_file(Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.exs")) end)

I see no output :smiling_face_with_tear: so not sure whats wrong

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

That message comes from an internal Erlang function crasher:

https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/7b164938ec6d8c8889417d51fe0e6b1a90cb7d39/erts/preloaded/src/erts_internal.erl#L1008

When spawn_opt can’t connect to the destination node to spawn the requested process, it spawns crasher instead and returns that PID:

https://github.com/erlang/otp/blob/7b164938ec6d8c8889417d51fe0e6b1a90cb7d39/erts/preloaded/src/erlang.erl#L3492-L3496

How are you creating node1@localhost and connecting to it?

D4no0

D4no0

Node.spawn/2 is a low-level function, try instead :erpc.call/2, that will handle redirection of errors and output.

yolo007wizard

yolo007wizard OP

I’m running tests from a livebook:

Node.spawn(:node1@localhost, fn -> Code.require_file(Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.exs")) end)

No luck

I also tried:

Node.start(:node1@localhost)
Node.set_cookie(:foo)

Node.connect(:node2@localhost)
Node.spawn(:node2@localhost, fn -> Code.require_file(Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.exs")) end)

still no luck

yolo007wizard

yolo007wizard OP

Ok I gave up on nodes as I’m not very confident with them. Not sure how I would prodify that either.

Another idea I didn’t think of is dead simple:

System.cmd("elixir", [Path.join(__DIR__, "action_test.exs")])

Getting back to the desired requirements this could work. Put all the action scripts in a cloud directory. Then the action runner checks if script exists before running it.

axelson

axelson

Scenic Core Team

When I tried running multiple notes before I used the Erlang :peer module.

Here’s a few snippets from a semi-defunct unreleased project I have:

    {:ok, node} =
      :peer.start_link(%{
        host: :localhost,
        name: 'peer_node',
        args: peer_args()
      })

    IO.puts("DONE Starting peer node!")
    add_code_paths(node)
    ensure_applications_started(node)
  defp add_code_paths(node) do
    rpc(node, :code, :add_paths, [:code.get_path()])
  end

  @apps_to_start [
    # :iex,
    :logger,
    # :file_system,
    # :jason,
    :erlexec,
    :runtime_tools,
    # :inets,
    :stdlib,
    :crypto,
    # :hex,
    :elixir,
    # :public_key,
    # :gviz,
    # :mix,
    # :gettext,
    :kernel,
    :ssl,
    :compiler
    # :asn1,
  ]

  defp ensure_applications_started(node) do
    rpc(node, Application, :ensure_all_started, [:mix])
    rpc(node, Mix, :env, [Mix.env()])

    # for {app_name, _, _} <- Application.loaded_applications() do
    #   rpc(node, Application, :ensure_all_started, [app_name])
    # end
    for app_name <- @apps_to_start do
      IO.inspect(app_name, label: "starting app_name")

      rpc(node, Application, :ensure_all_started, [app_name])
      |> IO.inspect(label: "started #{inspect(app_name)}")
    end
  end

  defp rpc(node, module, function, args) do
    :rpc.block_call(node, module, function, args)
  end

  defp peer_args do
    Enum.join(
      [
        "-loader inet -hosts 127.0.0.1",
        "-setcookie #{:erlang.get_cookie()}",
        # "-env MIX_BUILD_ROOT /tmp/gviz_build"
      ],
      " "
    )
    |> to_charlist()
  end
yolo007wizard

yolo007wizard OP

Ok I gave it a spin with a module wrapper like so:

defmodule PeerNode do

  def start(name) do
    {:ok, node} =
      :peer.start_link(%{
        host: :localhost,
        name: name,
        args: peer_args()
      })

    IO.puts("DONE Starting peer node!")
    add_code_paths(node)
    ensure_applications_started(node)
  end

  def peer_args do
    Enum.join(
      [
        "-loader inet -hosts 127.0.0.1",
        "-setcookie #{:erlang.get_cookie()}",
        # "-env MIX_BUILD_ROOT /tmp/gviz_build"
      ],
      " "
    )
    |> to_charlist()
  end

  defp rpc(node, module, function, args) do
    :rpc.block_call(node, module, function, args)
  end

  defp add_code_paths(node) do
    rpc(node, :code, :add_paths, [:code.get_path()])
  end

  @apps_to_start [
    # :iex,
    :logger,
    # :file_system,
    # :jason,
    :erlexec,
    :runtime_tools,
    # :inets,
    :stdlib,
    :crypto,
    # :hex,
    :elixir,
    # :public_key,
    # :gviz,
    # :mix,
    # :gettext,
    :kernel,
    :ssl,
    :compiler
    # :asn1,
  ]

  defp ensure_applications_started(node) do
    rpc(node, Application, :ensure_all_started, [:mix])
    rpc(node, Mix, :env, [Mix.env()])

    # for {app_name, _, _} <- Application.loaded_applications() do
    #   rpc(node, Application, :ensure_all_started, [app_name])
    # end
    for app_name <- @apps_to_start do
      IO.inspect(app_name, label: "starting app_name")

      rpc(node, Application, :ensure_all_started, [app_name])
      |> IO.inspect(label: "started #{inspect(app_name)}")
    end
  end
end

Then I ran:

PeerNode.start("first_peer_node")
Node.list(:hidden)

But its complaining about :peer args:

** (ErlangError) Erlang error: {:invalid_arg, 45}
(stdlib 5.0.2) peer.erl:563: :peer.“-verify_args/1-lc$^0/1-0-”/1
(stdlib 5.0.2) peer.erl:563: :peer.verify_args/1
(stdlib 5.0.2) peer.erl:626: :peer.start_it/2

For debugging I tried both with no luck:

:peer.start_link(%{
        host: :localhost,
        name: name,
        args: ["-loader inet -hosts 127.0.0.1 -setcookie #{:erlang.get_cookie()}"]
      })
:peer.start_link(%{
        host: :localhost,
        name: name,
        args: ~c"-loader inet -hosts 127.0.0.1 -setcookie hardcoded_cookie"
      })

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
kip
In 2021 I started a new library called Tempo with the objective of modelling time as a set of intervals - not as instants. In 2022 I gave...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews