chmod777
I have the following list:
[
:juridical_person_document,
[re_developments: [[properties: [[re_development: [:re_developer]]]]]],
:legal_address
]
And my desired output would be this:
[
:juridical_person_document,
re_developments: [properties: [re_development:
[:re_developer]]],
:legal_address
]
In other words, I want to remove the unnecessary square brackets. How can I achieve that?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates?
{Textile.render(@product.long_description)}
escapes the HTM...
New
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
When I use Mix.install with a git dependency, using git@github.com:... how do I change the SSH identity used?
I’ve got two Github accoun...
New
Hello all. I have a question as to best practices for code organization when implementing a liveview with a lot of responsibilities.
Sup...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
Hi everyone :waving_hand:
I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #code-sync
- #discussion
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #elixirconf-eu
- #processes
- #security
- #api
- #forms
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
As a literal, this isn’t valid syntax and makes the compiler complain:
The closest you can get is:
It’s certainly possible to remove the extra lists wrapped around some elements, but I’d start by looking into where this data comes from - specifically, why every keyword list seems to end up with an extra list wrapped around it.
dimitarvp
Welcome to the forum.
As @al2o3cr points out, your desired output is not even legal syntax. But if you put the atoms in front and the lists at the bottom then it becomes legal:
Note that this is actually a short-hand / convenient form of:
Your original problem is solveable if you can do a recursive visit function that converts double-nested lists – e.g.
[ [elements, ...] ]– to normal lists (e.g.[elements, ...]).We can give you the solution if you are truly stuck, no worries, but it’s usually a good idea for you to learn. So what have you tried?
Secondly, avoid the XY problem and let us know the original problem you are grappling with that led to this conundrum. Maybe we’ll be able to help better.
chmod777
@al2o3cr Indeed, this is not valid syntax. Thanks for letting me know.
@dimitarvp I discovered that
Macro.postwalk(list, fn [[x]] -> [x]; x -> x end)works for this case. But you’re right about the fact that I should learn how to handle this, I will take some time to study recursion better.