chmod777
I have the following list:
[
:juridical_person_document,
[re_developments: [[properties: [[re_development: [:re_developer]]]]]],
:legal_address
]
And my desired output would be this:
[
:juridical_person_document,
re_developments: [properties: [re_development:
[:re_developer]]],
:legal_address
]
In other words, I want to remove the unnecessary square brackets. How can I achieve that?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
Hey guys,
I’ve got a huge CSV ( around 10 GB ) that needs to be processed hourly
Do you guys have any suggestions what is the best prac...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I have what I’ve heard referred to as a “lookup table” in my database. This is a way of assigning codes to common values. One common lo...
New
Hello,
I’m developing a online persistent chat system (what’s app) like using elixir/dynamodb/aws for a mobile app(flutter).
The diffic...
New
What approach to take when sending live updates to “random” users Hi! I have a question, I have a little chat app, and when I create a DM...
New
I think I’ve found a small improvement I could contribute to <%= web_namespace %>.CoreComponents (installer/templates/phx_web/compo...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
There are three potential reasons for members of this forum to have a look at https://vutuv.de
You are tired or annoyed of LinkedIn.
Yo...
New
Aludel - LLM Evaluation Workbench
Aludel is an embeddable Phoenix LiveView dashboard for evaluating and comparing LLM prompts across mult...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #elixirconf-us
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
al2o3cr
As a literal, this isn’t valid syntax and makes the compiler complain:
The closest you can get is:
It’s certainly possible to remove the extra lists wrapped around some elements, but I’d start by looking into where this data comes from - specifically, why every keyword list seems to end up with an extra list wrapped around it.
dimitarvp
Welcome to the forum.
As @al2o3cr points out, your desired output is not even legal syntax. But if you put the atoms in front and the lists at the bottom then it becomes legal:
Note that this is actually a short-hand / convenient form of:
Your original problem is solveable if you can do a recursive visit function that converts double-nested lists – e.g.
[ [elements, ...] ]– to normal lists (e.g.[elements, ...]).We can give you the solution if you are truly stuck, no worries, but it’s usually a good idea for you to learn. So what have you tried?
Secondly, avoid the XY problem and let us know the original problem you are grappling with that led to this conundrum. Maybe we’ll be able to help better.
chmod777
@al2o3cr Indeed, this is not valid syntax. Thanks for letting me know.
@dimitarvp I discovered that
Macro.postwalk(list, fn [[x]] -> [x]; x -> x end)works for this case. But you’re right about the fact that I should learn how to handle this, I will take some time to study recursion better.