maz

maz

I’d like to queue the mailing of an email via Bamboo but this code results in a Protocol.UndefinedError because it seems that Oban doesn’t know how to encode the %Bamboo.Email{} struct that contains the email body etc. Am I doing this correctly? If I am, I don’t understand why if Oban needs to encode the data which it’s about to queue. Wouldn’t every struct be unique and therefore there should be a way to handle this in the general case?

caller code:

defmodule Elijah.Emails do
  import Bamboo.Email
  use Bamboo.Phoenix, view: ElijahWeb.EmailView

  alias Elijah.Accounts.Jobs.WelcomeEmail

  @sender_no_reply {"Elijah", "no-reply@elijah.app"}
  @supported_locales ~w(en)

  def welcome_email(%{user: user, url: url}) do
    base_email()
    |> subject("Elijah - Welcome!")
    |> to(user.email)
    |> assign(:user, user)
    |> assign(:url, url)
    |> render_i18n(:welcome_email)
    |> premail()
    |> WelcomeEmail.new()
    |> Oban.insert()
  end

...

Oban job:

defmodule Elijah.Accounts.Jobs.WelcomeEmail do
  use Oban.Worker, queue: :mailer, max_attempts: 4

  @impl Oban.Worker
  def perform(email, _job) do
    # IO.inspect(email)
    email
    |> Elijah.Mailer.deliver_now()
    :ok
  end
end

stack:

        (jason 1.2.1) lib/jason.ex:199: Jason.encode_to_iodata!/2
        (postgrex 0.15.5) lib/postgrex/type_module.ex:897: Postgrex.DefaultTypes.encode_params/3
        (postgrex 0.15.5) lib/postgrex/query.ex:75: DBConnection.Query.Postgrex.Query.encode/3
        (db_connection 2.2.2) lib/db_connection.ex:1148: DBConnection.encode/5
        (db_connection 2.2.2) lib/db_connection.ex:1246: DBConnection.run_prepare_execute/5
        (db_connection 2.2.2) lib/db_connection.ex:539: DBConnection.parsed_prepare_execute/5
        (db_connection 2.2.2) lib/db_connection.ex:532: DBConnection.prepare_execute/4
        (postgrex 0.15.5) lib/postgrex.ex:214: Postgrex.query/4
        (ecto_sql 3.4.5) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:630: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.struct/10
        (ecto 3.4.6) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:661: Ecto.Repo.Schema.apply/4
        (ecto 3.4.6) lib/ecto/repo/schema.ex:263: anonymous fn/15 in Ecto.Repo.Schema.do_insert/4
        (ecto_sql 3.4.5) lib/ecto/adapters/sql.ex:875: anonymous fn/3 in Ecto.Adapters.SQL.checkout_or_transaction/4
        (db_connection 2.2.2) lib/db_connection.ex:1427: DBConnection.run_transaction/4
        (oban 2.1.0) lib/oban/query.ex:47: Oban.Query.fetch_or_insert_job/2
        (elijah 0.1.0) lib/elijah/accounts/user_notifier.ex:17: Elijah.Accounts.UserNotifier.deliver_confirmation_instructions/2
        (elijah 0.1.0) lib/elijah_web/controllers/user_registration_controller.ex:17: ElijahWeb.UserRegistrationController.create/2
        (elijah 0.1.0) lib/elijah_web/controllers/user_registration_controller.ex:1: ElijahWeb.Us (truncated)

thanks for any help,
Michael

Showing Posts 1 to 4

chulkilee

chulkilee

Note that

  • Oban stores the job args in the db as json - so that job worker can retrieve them later
  • Jason rejects to converts a struct to json.

So just need to convert the struct to the map. Please note that if your struct is from ecto schema, the struct has more internal state and metadata for ecto…

There are two approaches

  • Pass minimal information to background job, and do the all thing in the background job
  • Pre-process as much as possible, and then pass only background job info to the queue

In most cases I prefer the former for following reasons

  • all work is in one function
  • your oban worker is very simple - just convert job args to value (with error handling, such as user is removed in the meantime) and call the function
  • it’s often easier to scale workers than the caller side (e.g. api side)

Here is a pattern I’m using:

defmodule MyEmails do
  def welcome_email(%User{} = user, url) do
     # actual job
  end 
end

defmodule MyEmailJob do
  use Oban.Worker, queue: :email

  def build(%User{id: user_id}, url), do: new(%{user_id: user_id, url: url})

  def perform(%Oban.Job{args: %{"user_id" => user_id, "url" => url}}) do
    user = MyApp.find_user!(user_id) # better to handle when user is already gone :)
    MyEmails.welcome_email(user, url)
  end
end

MyEmailJob.build(user, url) |> Oban.insert()

You can see:

  • context module does not need to know anything about oban
  • oban worker module is responsible to transfrom args between elixir app and oban

Whether to pass only reference or the full args - it really depends. For example, if you need the exact information when job is placed - then you should pass that information as job args, instead of delaying fetching them by job worker.

maz

maz OP

Yeah thanks for the detailed explanation. I get it now, Oban should be treated like a “pass-through”. I wasn’t quite understanding it’s design/usage but your reply helped a lot. The email worked.

For others with similar problems, here is my code.

  def deliver_confirmation_instructions(user, url) do
    WelcomeEmail.build(user.email, url) |> Oban.insert()
    {:ok, %{to: user.email, url: url}}
  end
defmodule Elijah.Accounts.Jobs.WelcomeEmail do
  alias Elijah.Emails
  use Oban.Worker, queue: :mailers, max_attempts: 4

  def build(email, url), do: new(%{email: email, url: url})

  def perform(%Oban.Job{args: %{"email" => email, "url" => url}}) do
    Emails.welcome_email(%{email: email, url: url})
  end
end
defmodule Elijah.Emails do
  import Bamboo.Email
  use Bamboo.Phoenix, view: ElijahWeb.EmailView

  @sender_no_reply {"Elijah", "no-reply@elijah.app"}
  @supported_locales ~w(en)

  def welcome_email(%{email: email, url: url}) do
    base_email()
    |> subject("Elijah - Welcome!")
    |> to(email)
    |> assign(:email, email)
    |> assign(:url, url)
    |> render_i18n(:welcome_email)
    |> premail()
    |> Elijah.Mailer.deliver_now()
    :ok
  end

...
chulkilee

chulkilee

Storing Elixir term has its own pros and cons. For the illusion of “transparently passing elixir term”… here are downsides:

  • hard to use the job queue by non-Elixir app
  • hard to implement uniqueness based on job args

For your information:

  • ecto_job supports erlang/elixir terms in args with configuration (storing them in bytea not jsonb)
  • You may try poison which supports struct <=> json conversion.. but I’m not sure it would work well with Oban.
chasers

chasers

FWIW you can encode Erlang types into JSON by doing:

property = my_property_struct
bin_property = :erlang.term_to_binary(property) |> :erlang.binary_to_list()

PropertyJob.new(%{
  "property_id" => property.id,
  "property_address" => property.address,
  "bin_property" => bin_property
})
|> Oban.insert()

When decoding just do:

property = :erlang.list_to_binary(bin_property) |> :erlang.binary_to_term()

I have a Property struct with some nested structures with some tuples in them. It is, I think, cleaner to do this than to do a custom JSON encoder / decoder.

Note, that am pulling out the property.id and property.address for the Oban args so I can unique the job on property ID and inspect the address if something goes wrong.

I could store what I have of the property in the db first and reference it with the id, but I was unable to do that because of some other requirements. With this I’m able to just pass it around in Oban, and finally store it when I’m ready.

Not sure where this breaks down but it’s working for me for now.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews