ijverig
My question is regarding the implementation of the language:
In Erlang we have element to access tuple elements, setelement to change elements, append_element to append elements to tuples, and so on…
In Elixir we have elem, put_elem and Tuple.append, respectively.
Why some functions like elem and put_elem are part of Kernel in Elixir, while others that seem to be at the same “level” are in proper modules (like Tuple.append)?
For me it’s like saying elem and put_elem are core to the language, and that comes before being into Tuple.
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #ai
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Elixir, Erlang & BEAM conferences from Code Sync - join us in 2026!
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
Producing high quality Elixir screencasts since 2017.
**Building the future of software with AI, trust, and human connection.**
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
Showing Posts 1 to 3- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
NobbZ
elem/2is guard safe, I think thats the main reason why it is inKernel.put_elemis probably inKernelto line up withput_in/2/3, but I’d like to not see it there as it involves the cost of copying the full tuple.Tuple.append/2is probably in its very own module, because it involves the cost of copying should be carefully thought upon before just using it.These are assumptions based on observations mixed with a bit of personal opinion.
dom
The module doc for Tuple has a pretty lengthy explanation.
In short, it’s because having to use functions like
Tuple.append/2is a warning sign that you’re not using tuples as the fixed-size containers they’re meant to be, and so you’re likely to create performance problems, or at least non-idiomatic code.peerreynders
In my view using functions on tuples feels wrong (but there are always exceptions). They seem like intrinsic “values/units” that are constructed with the tuple notation and smashed with destructuring (via pattern-matching).
Strangely with maps I’m quite the opposite - they seem more complex and free form than tuples so I tend towards using functions rather than (yet another) map notation (I guess Clojure made me operator averse/function friendly). I keep having to remind myself:
List are in the middle. I have to be backed into a corner before I use
hd/1ortl/1preferring the cons notation - probably because that is the bread and butter for pattern matching (for destructuring) - otherwise they are dominated by higher order functions (… andEnum.at/3makes me cringe).