ob1

ob1

Partitioning Postgres tables by timestamp based UUIDs

Recently we partitioned a table with 28 million rows by its ULID to improve query speeds and reduce query timeouts. To do this I ended up pulling together various bits of information across the internet and thought it might be worth compressing it into a guide for future reference and discussion on areas I might have missed!

The problem

We had a very large table (28 million) rows that we were getting timeouts querying on anything other than the primary key. No matter what indexes we threw at the table we couldn’t get queries to complete in an acceptable time for use on the front end of the application.

Constraints

The table in question was where we stored and processed payloads from our customers, so it needed to be very quick for individual lookups in order to update its state as it was processed into the application and fast for broader retrieval to display on the front end of our application.

Problems with partitioning

Partitioning had always been an option and something we had attempted previously. Our original attempt to speed it up had been partitioning the table on the insertion time of the record but, if you’ve ever done partitioning before you will know, you cannot have a globally unique index.

To create a unique or primary key constraint on a partitioned table, the partition keys must not include any expressions or function calls and the constraint’s columns must include all of the partition key columns. This limitation exists because the individual indexes making up the constraint can only directly enforce uniqueness within their own partitions; therefore, the partition structure itself must guarantee that there are not duplicates in different partitions.

Without the globally unique index for the id of the payload meant that queries for a specific payload had to check every partition. This made the individual processing of a given payload too slow to make this a workable scenario.

Partitioning with ULIDs

The solution then was to have the id of the payload be a ULID based on its inserted_at and partition the tables on the timestamp component of the ULID it generated on the database! This means we could retain a global index for quick individual row lookups and have a way to ignore irrelevant partitions based on the id.

This took a few different steps…

Preparing the database

Postgres doesn’t with with ULIDs directly but between Ecto and Postgres they are cast to a UUID in the database. We needed a method for Postgres to take a ULID and convert it to the corresponding UUID that we can work with in SQL.

We added the functions here to a migration to make them available on the database.

While you’re on the database it’s worth ensuring that enable_partition_pruning is enabled as this is how Postgres is able to ignore irrelevant partitions.

Functions for manipulating ULIDs

To create the partitions we needed to be able to get the time portion of the ULID and get the bounds of any ids possible within the time.

This required slicing the time portion of the ULID and setting either “0” or “Z” depending on which bound we needed.

  @doc """
  Slices the time portion of a ULID
  """
  def ulid_time(ulid), do: String.slice(ulid, 0..9)

  @doc """
  Returns the time based start of a ULID
  """
  def ulid_start_time(ulid), do: ulid_time(ulid) |> String.pad_trailing(26, "0")

  @doc """
  Returns the time based end of a ULID
  """
  def ulid_end_time(ulid), do: ulid_time(ulid) |> String.pad_trailing(26, "Z")

  @doc """
  Returns the time based ULID with bounds from a Date or DateTime
  """
  def datetime_to_ulid(datetime, bound \\ nil)

  def datetime_to_ulid(date = %Date{}, bound),
    do: DateTime.new!(date, Time.new!(0, 0, 0)) |> datetime_to_ulid(bound)

  def datetime_to_ulid(datetime = %DateTime{}, bound) do
    case bound do
      nil -> DateTime.to_unix(datetime, :millisecond) |> Ecto.ULID.generate()
      :start -> datetime_to_ulid(datetime) |> ulid_start_time()
      :end -> datetime_to_ulid(datetime) |> ulid_end_time()
    end
  end

  def datetime_to_ulid(naive_datetime = %NaiveDateTime{}, bound),
    do: DateTime.from_naive!(naive_datetime, "Etc/UTC") |> datetime_to_ulid(bound)

Ensuring that timestamp and ids timestamp match

This is not strictly necessary for tables where the insertion time is close enough to the autogeneration of the id that you wont get too much drift but if there could be drift, or you want to partition on an timestamp that wont necessarily correlate with the id here is how. The following is all performed on the schema.

Start by turning off the autogeneration of the id.

@primary_key {:id, ULID, autogenerate: false}

Check if the changeset has an id, and if it doesn’t add one based on the timestamp you want to use. In the following example I have used occurred_at.

  defp create_id_if_not_exsits(changeset) do
    case get_change(changeset, :id) do
      nil ->
        occurred_at = get_change(changeset, :occurred_at)
        put_change(changeset, :id, ULIDUtils.datetime_to_ulid(occurred_at))

      _ ->
        changeset
    end
  end

Finally add it as part of your changeset.

  def changeset(changeset, attrs) do
    changeset
    # ...
    |> create_id_if_not_exsits()
    # other methods

Database migration

I cannot take full credit for this as it’s adapted from Matthew Johnston’s work on partitioning, changed to work with id’s.

We need to start with a couple of helper functions to help us partition on month. You might want something different so feel free to modify to fit your requirements.

    defp beginning_of_month(date) do
    if date.day == 1 do
      date
    else
      Date.add(date, -(date.day - 1))
    end
  end

  defp calculate_next_month(date, 0), do: date

  defp calculate_next_month(date, months) do
    next = Date.add(date, Date.days_in_month(date))
    calculate_next_month(next, months - 1)
  end

  def months_from(date, num_months) do
    start_date = beginning_of_month(date)

    for months <- 0..num_months do
      calculate_next_month(start_date, months)
    end
  end

We use the functions above and our ULID functions earlier to have a query that will generate the query to make each partition.

def create_partition_query(table, date) do
    start_date = date

    stop_date =
      date
      |> Date.add(Date.days_in_month(date))
      |> Date.add(-1)

    month =
      start_date.month
      |> Integer.to_string()
      |> String.pad_leading(2, "0")

    stop_datetime = DateTime.new!(stop_date, Time.new!(23, 59, 59, 999_999))
    end_ulid = datetime_to_ulid(stop_datetime, :end)

    start_ulid = datetime_to_ulid(start_date, :start)

    """
    CREATE TABLE #{table}_p#{start_date.year}#{month}
    PARTITION OF #{table} FOR VALUES
    FROM (ulid_to_uuid('#{start_ulid}'))
    TO (ulid_to_uuid('#{end_ulid}'))
    """
  end

Finally we can tie it all together with out table creation!

    create table(:payloads, primary_key: false, options: "PARTITION BY RANGE(id)") do
      add(:id, :binary_id, null: false, primary_key: true)

      # ... other fields and references
    end

    # Create the default table that will ingest entries that don't match the ranges.
    # This is not strictly necessary but means that id's that aren't in the ranges we
    # declared don't create an error
    execute("CREATE TABLE payloads_default PARTITION OF payloads DEFAULT")

    # Create 48 months worth of partitions starting from 2022-01-01
    for month <- ULIDUtils.months_from(~D[2022-01-01], 48) do
      query = ULIDUtils.create_partition_query("payloads", month)
      execute(query)
    end

That’s it you’ve just created your partitioned table based on the timestamp based UUID!

Improving your query speeds

Now your Ecto queries can utilize the id to only query partitions that contain the data they are looking for skipping other partitions that don’t hold any relevant data. We use a combination of the database and ULID functions we created earlier in the where call.

    query
    |> where(
        query,
        [p],
        fragment("? >= ulid_to_uuid(?)", p.id, ^ULIDUtils.datetime_to_ulid(from, :start))
    )

Conclusion

So we went from queries taking multiple minutes to sub-second, zero timeouts and we were also able to retain very quick lookups on individual rows!

I hope that this helps others after me, and if you’ve got any suggestions on where you might do something slightly differently let me know! (I’ve only been working with Elixir for a little over a year now and I suspect there are some code smells etc in the above)

Most Liked

filipecabaco

filipecabaco

Great post! Thank you for sharing!

Do you think that opting for uuid v7 would have made this easier?

adw632

adw632

Did you consider using the timescale db extension to auto partiition? Besides Automatically partionioning it provides a lot of other useful enhancements.

GitHub extension page here:
https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb

Nezteb

Nezteb

I was unfamiliar with ULID before reading this post and the official spec. Neat!

It sounds like ULID isn’t completely supported by Postgres quite yet? Or are the extensions pretty solid at this point?

I found three Hex packages that might be relevant:

But I assume those aren’t strictly necessary if you’re going the fragment route? :sweat_smile:

Where Next?

Popular in Guides/Tuts Top

malloryerik
Hi, this is for people who, like me, have had some friction using .html.heex templates in VSCode. The solution seems to be, in a hyphena...
New
jswny
Hello everyone, I recently redesigned my entire deployment process for Phoenix apps based on Docker. I really like the strategy that I ca...
New
OvermindDL1
Ran across this recently, it’s a set of cheatsheet inforgraphic things of the OTP behaviours on the BEAM: https://github.com/Telichkin/o...
New
anuragg
Hi everyone! I’m the founder of Render, a new cloud provider with native support for Elixir. When we launched Elixir support the most po...
New
hauleth
Some time ago someone suggested me to write article about how I have configured my Vim to work with Elixir, now there it is: https://med...
New
hauks96
Hello everyone, I created a deployment tutorial for Phoenix applications with Kubernetes (microk8s) a few months back with the goal of s...
New
lukertty
Install web-mode and mmm-mode first and put this in your config file: (require 'mmm-mode) (require 'web-mode) (setq mmm-global-mode 'may...
New
sergio
Hey there, we’re going to walk through deploying a Phoenix app to a DigitalOcean droplet, manually - no tools no nothing. Just straight u...
New
marcin
This post is intended to be a guide for others, I was running a remote debugger for the first time and appreciate feedback on how I could...
New
nelsonic
When we were figuring out how to use Phoenix LiveView we got stuck a few times. So in order to save other people time, we created a comp...
New

Other popular topics Top

senggen
Erlang/OTP 25 [erts-13.2.2] [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [ds:8:8:10] [async-threads:1] 15:22:35.803 [error] gen_event {lager_file_backend...
New
AstonJ
Posting this to see if we can make things easier for people to get into Neovim. If you use Neovim and have a favourite distro please let ...
New
TunkShif
This post is an instruction guide to help you setup your Neovim for Elixir development from scratch. It includes general information on h...
274 41539 114
New
albydarned
Hello all! I am typing this post from my new MacBook Pro with the M1 chip. I’m loving it so far, and will probably use it as my daily dr...
New
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
About me? ( if you have nothing better to do than reading about some random guy in the internet :stuck_out_tongue: ) Hello all, this is ...
New
jay1
Why is it that the mnesia database isn’t the most preferred database for use in Elixir/Phoenix?
New
vrod
I am using the Starship cross-shell prompt – it seems pretty nice, but I get some errors: [WARN] - (starship::utils): Executing command ...
New
freewebwithme
Using vs code and installed ElixirLS: support and debugger. And I got an error popped up on start up says Failed to run ‘elixir’ comma...
New
klo
Got a question about when to concat vs. prepending items to list then reversing to achieve appending. So i know lists boil down to [1 | ...
New
lanycrost
Hi everyone! I need implement if…else if…else condition from my elixir code, and anymore of this control flow structures not work proper...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement