grangerelixx

grangerelixx

I have a list of maps.

For example,
students = [%{ sid: 1, name: "Bob", score: 80}, %{ sid: 2, name: "Kelly", score: 60},.....]

I have a function that accepts a single student map as a parameter,

calculate_percentage(student) do
 something
end

I want to be able to pass each map in students list to calculate_percentage function. I tried Enum.map but that returns a list again. Can I know how to pass each value in a list one by one to the calculate_percentage function? Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks! :smiley:

Showing Posts 1 to 9

Nicd

Nicd

You did not specify what the calculate_percentage function should do and that is quite important.

But if you want it to return a single value, you want to look at Enum.reduce. A reduce is one of the most fundamental operations in functional programming so it’s useful to learn it. With it, you can reduce an input value to an output value. For example you can reduce a list into a single value (but the output can be anything, and it can even be a list).

Without knowing what your function does, you probably want something like:

Enum.reduce(students, 0, fn student, accumulator ->
  calculate_percentage(accumulator, student)
end)

The accumulator is the value that has been accumulated during the processing of the input and in every call, you need to return the updated value of the accumulator, which will be given with the next value from the input. The final value of the accumulator is the return value of the reduce.

If this does not answer your question, can you elaborate on what calculate_percentage should do?

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

If you want side effect only, then use Enum.each/2

grangerelixx

grangerelixx OP

I thought giving a simplified example would help. But the original list consists of a list of structs. And the I have written a function that accepts a single struct.

a single struct looks like this

%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}

So a list consists of

[
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
},
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
},
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
]

This is the function I have

def translate(%Post{} = post) do
    post
    |> Post.changeset(%{
      feedbacks:
        translate_feedbacks(
          post.feedbacks
        )
    })
    |> Ecto.Changeset.apply_changes()

Now, I want to be able to pass each struct in the list to this function.

grangerelixx

grangerelixx OP

No I don’t want the side effect. Is there a way to use Enum.each without getting :ok ? Enum.each works perfect for my requirement except for the fact that it returns :ok

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

I think you are confused about what is side-effect. A function converts inputs to outputs. If the function does only this and nothing else, it is called a pure function, or a function without side effect. A side effect is something you want to achieve in addition to the conversion: Writing databases, sending some data to the network, etc.

If you don’t want side effect and don’t care about the return value, then there is really no point calling the function.

The :ok is just a place holder for the return value. In Elixir there is no void function. You are welcomed to discard the meaningless return value.

APB9785

APB9785

Creator of ECSx

If you don’t want the return values because you are in a function pipeline, you can use the new Kernel - tap/2, introduced in Elixir 1.12

grangerelixx

grangerelixx OP

Thank you for explaining this. When I use Enum.each(posts, &IO.inspect/1), I get the following

%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
:ok

I am not sure how to discard this :ok. Any thoughts on how we can discard :ok?

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

Just don’t assign it to any variable?
The REPL is a exploration vehicle; not your program. When you run your program for real you will have the full control of what to print and what not to print.

APB9785

APB9785

Creator of ECSx

In elixir, everything is “discarded” except the last line of the function. For example:

def my_func(param1, param2) do
  Database.query(param1) # returns list of users [%User{} ...]
  UserProfile.update!(param1, param2) # returns %UserProfile{} struct
  1 + 1
end

The only thing my_func is going to return is 2. The first two function calls will still happen - leading to potential “side_effects” (like updating a row in the database), but they have no effect on the return value of my_func. Only the last line is returned. If you want to return the result of several function in combination, you use the pipeline operator:

def my_func(user_id, new_email) do
  User.get_user!(user_id)
  |> User.update!(new_email)
  |> Map.get(:email)
end

This function will fetch a User from the db, pass that user along to the next function where it gets updated in the db, and finally get the email from out of our updated %User{} struct.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
yarrichar
I’m very new to Elixir, so sorry if this is a silly question: I am wondering what happens to the mailbox of a process when the machine i...
New
pragdave
How do I tell Hologram not to escape HTML when substituting into templates? {Textile.render(@product.long_description)} escapes the HTM...
New
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Background When trying to execute mix release on a Windows 11 machine for a Phoenix project I get the following error: * assembling mark...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
rlipscombe
I’d like to create a file with 600 permissions (rw-------), but there’s a race condition if I create it and then change the permissions. ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews