grangerelixx

grangerelixx

I have a list of maps.

For example,
students = [%{ sid: 1, name: "Bob", score: 80}, %{ sid: 2, name: "Kelly", score: 60},.....]

I have a function that accepts a single student map as a parameter,

calculate_percentage(student) do
 something
end

I want to be able to pass each map in students list to calculate_percentage function. I tried Enum.map but that returns a list again. Can I know how to pass each value in a list one by one to the calculate_percentage function? Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks! :smiley:

Showing Posts 1 to 9

Nicd

Nicd

You did not specify what the calculate_percentage function should do and that is quite important.

But if you want it to return a single value, you want to look at Enum.reduce. A reduce is one of the most fundamental operations in functional programming so it’s useful to learn it. With it, you can reduce an input value to an output value. For example you can reduce a list into a single value (but the output can be anything, and it can even be a list).

Without knowing what your function does, you probably want something like:

Enum.reduce(students, 0, fn student, accumulator ->
  calculate_percentage(accumulator, student)
end)

The accumulator is the value that has been accumulated during the processing of the input and in every call, you need to return the updated value of the accumulator, which will be given with the next value from the input. The final value of the accumulator is the return value of the reduce.

If this does not answer your question, can you elaborate on what calculate_percentage should do?

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

If you want side effect only, then use Enum.each/2

grangerelixx

grangerelixx OP

I thought giving a simplified example would help. But the original list consists of a list of structs. And the I have written a function that accepts a single struct.

a single struct looks like this

%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}

So a list consists of

[
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
},
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
},
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
]

This is the function I have

def translate(%Post{} = post) do
    post
    |> Post.changeset(%{
      feedbacks:
        translate_feedbacks(
          post.feedbacks
        )
    })
    |> Ecto.Changeset.apply_changes()

Now, I want to be able to pass each struct in the list to this function.

grangerelixx

grangerelixx OP

No I don’t want the side effect. Is there a way to use Enum.each without getting :ok ? Enum.each works perfect for my requirement except for the fact that it returns :ok

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

I think you are confused about what is side-effect. A function converts inputs to outputs. If the function does only this and nothing else, it is called a pure function, or a function without side effect. A side effect is something you want to achieve in addition to the conversion: Writing databases, sending some data to the network, etc.

If you don’t want side effect and don’t care about the return value, then there is really no point calling the function.

The :ok is just a place holder for the return value. In Elixir there is no void function. You are welcomed to discard the meaningless return value.

APB9785

APB9785

Creator of ECSx

If you don’t want the return values because you are in a function pipeline, you can use the new Kernel - tap/2, introduced in Elixir 1.12

grangerelixx

grangerelixx OP

Thank you for explaining this. When I use Enum.each(posts, &IO.inspect/1), I get the following

%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
%Post{
         id : uuid, 
         name: some name,
         feedbacks: [
                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         },

                 %Comment{
                           ........
                         }
                 ]
}
:ok

I am not sure how to discard this :ok. Any thoughts on how we can discard :ok?

derek-zhou

derek-zhou

Just don’t assign it to any variable?
The REPL is a exploration vehicle; not your program. When you run your program for real you will have the full control of what to print and what not to print.

APB9785

APB9785

Creator of ECSx

In elixir, everything is “discarded” except the last line of the function. For example:

def my_func(param1, param2) do
  Database.query(param1) # returns list of users [%User{} ...]
  UserProfile.update!(param1, param2) # returns %UserProfile{} struct
  1 + 1
end

The only thing my_func is going to return is 2. The first two function calls will still happen - leading to potential “side_effects” (like updating a row in the database), but they have no effect on the return value of my_func. Only the last line is returned. If you want to return the result of several function in combination, you use the pipeline operator:

def my_func(user_id, new_email) do
  User.get_user!(user_id)
  |> User.update!(new_email)
  |> Map.get(:email)
end

This function will fetch a User from the db, pass that user along to the next function where it gets updated in the db, and finally get the email from out of our updated %User{} struct.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews