jdellitt
Is it possible to pause a Workflow then continue it at a later time? For example, we’d like to start a Workflow with several Jobs, but want to put it into a suspended/paused state until some external event occurs (like a webhook), which would satisfy the dependency and resume the rest of the workflow. Been looking through the docs, and haven’t seen anything, so just wanting to rule out whether or not it’s possible. Thanks!
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Latest Oban Threads
Latest on Elixir Forum
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #ai
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
cevado
Doesn’t appeding jobs to a workflow solve your issue?
You can create a workflow with all the jobs that doesn’t rely on the webhook.
When the webhook happens, you can append the jobs that depend on the webhook and include their dependency on other jobs.
This way you never need to worry about the “state” of the jobs in that workflow, Oban takes care of the dependencies after you append the new jobs.
jdellitt
Thanks @cevado, I do think that could work, but I was hoping to be able to define the whole Workflow up front (in a single place) as opposed to having that logic in two different places.
It seems like we may need to have a job in the middle that essentially checks for a condition and snoozes itself itself if that condition hasn’t been fulfilled.
cevado
you can make the code that append the jobs as a public function in the workflow module. this way you keep all the data about the workflow in the workflow module without needing to create a job that starves the queue/workers without a good reason.
you could even use the meta option of a job to add some internal identifiers that makes it easier to find the workflow when the webhook happens.
bkilshaw
@jdellitt Did you ever figure this out by any chance?
jdellitt
No, unfortunately. I think we ended up going in a different direction altogether.
sorentwo
As alluded earlier in this thread, the way we usually suggest doing this is to have the job you’d like to pause snooze itself in a loop, with a limit to prevent unbounded retries. Here’s an example:
You can optionally use
uniqueandreplaceto upsert the snoozing job to run immediately, but it requires carefully setting theworkflow_id:This question comes up rather frequently though, and a proper
Oban.Pro.Workflow.pause/1andOban.Pro.Workflow.resume/1seem warranted