agacode

agacode

Hi Guys,

I’m have a performance issue after an elixir upgrade:

before:
elixir 1.6.4
erlang 20.3
phoenix 1.3.2

now:
elixir 1.9.0
erlang 22.0.4
phoenix 1.4.10

2000 requests/sec, 100 DB Connections (Postgres)

Before the 2000 requests executed in about 4 - 5 min, but the average time for each request was like 6s (I know this number is high and I need to cache some results to lower the request execution time, but that is not the problem I’m facing)

After the upgrade the total time is less about 2 - 3 min, but the average time for each request is 40s. It was a surprise to me that the new Elixir with the same settings as before was performing worse, even more, I’m losing some requests the HAProxy (working as reverse proxy) shows 2000 and my elixir backend app shows 1600. I even had to tweak some configuration values (to be able to finish most of the request) that I didn’t have to tweak before.

When I look at the logs locally, I see that the DBConnection Pool is switching too much between request and it is trying to execute close to 1 query on each request. So, it means that I have close to 2000 request executing little by little (I think because of this new CoDel alg). I would prefer to use a setting (If there was one) to assign a DBConnection to a request till the request finishes executing. I was looking also into DBConnection.Ownership to play with the :ownership_timeout but I also read that DBConnection.Ownership is more for tests (might have misinterpreted this)

My current settings:

	config :myapp, BeaconWeb.Endpoint,
	  http: [
		...
		protocol_options: [
		  idle_timeout: 1_200_000,
		  inactivity_timeout: 1_200_000
		]
	  ]

	config :myapp, Beacon.Repo,
      ...
	  pool_size: 100,
	  timeout: 100_000_000,
	  queue_target: 100_000_000

As additional information I’m getting this message frequently on localhost:
With DBConnection.ConnectionPool:

[info] [] Postgrex.Protocol (#PID<0.2384.0>) disconnected: ** (DBConnection.ConnectionError) client #PID<0.4135.0> exited

With DBConnection.Ownership:

[error] [] Postgrex.Protocol (#PID<0.2384.0>) disconnected: ** (DBConnection.ConnectionError) client #PID<0.4135.0> exited

Documentation I have checked:

https://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/2.5/manual/cowboy_http/

Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

First 10 of 16 Posts Switch mode

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

You can do so explicitly via:

MyApp.Repo.checkout(fn ->
  # all calls made inside here will use the same connection.
end)
agacode

agacode OP

@benwilson512 Thanks for your rapid reply, I would have to do that for the whole application, the Repo is used in multiple modules. I was looking more for a global setting or so. I just upgraded the application and facing this problem, I was expecting to perform better out of the box. But I will keep that suggestion to use it in the case I cannot find anything at a global level. Thank you

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

@agacode Usually if you wanted to do that “app wide” you’d basically just do it at the controller or plug call function or whatever. Doing it app wide is a tricky concept with all the different processes running around. Most processes never even touch the database, so there has to be an explicit point at which you say “This process is checking out a database connection”.

agacode

agacode OP

@benwilson512 I’ll try that and see how it goes. What pool? regular ConnectionPool or Ownership or any other?

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

Regular. If your responses are taking 40 seconds though I’d seriously audit the database requests being made. Could you also supply the actual mechanism you’re using to benchmark?

agacode

agacode OP

If your responses are taking 40 seconds though I’d seriously audit the database requests being made

There is almost no time for refactors due to a constant business need for new features and other constraints that don’t allow the developers directly access/audit the DB.
But my comparison/baseline is the following:
old version 6s vs new version 40s (Same old code, project generated from scratch and adjusted)

Could you also supply the actual mechanism you’re using to benchmark?

We had benchee before for the old version although we haven’t run it in a very long time.

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

By benchmark I mean what are you using to generate the 2000 req / sec?

In rereading your original question, I’m curious how you’re measuring this data. If after the upgrade everything completed nearly twice as fast it seems impossible that the average request time increased by nearly a factor of 7.

agacode

agacode OP

Oh sorry I misunderstood your question, we use JMeter to do the load tests, we also have production API clients that send a big batch of requests and provide us later with the amount of requests they sent, also HAProxy is registering all the connections/requests.

Each request individually takes longer (I assume because of the amount of queries we execute within the request and it is multiplexing too much), the whole batch takes a bit less than before. Maybe there is no logical explanation for that, but those are the facts.

I will tests with Repo.checkout in a request level place and see how it goes. Thank you so much!

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

I would consider renaming the question to be more about the general performance issue you’re experiencing after upgrading by the way. Doing an explicit database checkout may help, it might also not. The issue you’re experiencing is the slowdown, there may be other avenues to approach in so far as improving that goes.

agacode

agacode OP

Done :wink:

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
jonnycharles
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
spammy
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
silverdr
Using Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine as an EEx.Engine is deprecated! To compile HEEx, use Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine.compile/2 instead. Sta...
New
dli
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app? Looking for hints regarding: Addi...
New
bottlenecked
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps. Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
michallepicki
I am using Oban and occasionally, shortly after a deployment, a handful of jobs can fail because of dependency on other parts of the syst...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge &amp; Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
type1fool
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement