agacode

agacode

Hi Guys,

I’m have a performance issue after an elixir upgrade:

before:
elixir 1.6.4
erlang 20.3
phoenix 1.3.2

now:
elixir 1.9.0
erlang 22.0.4
phoenix 1.4.10

2000 requests/sec, 100 DB Connections (Postgres)

Before the 2000 requests executed in about 4 - 5 min, but the average time for each request was like 6s (I know this number is high and I need to cache some results to lower the request execution time, but that is not the problem I’m facing)

After the upgrade the total time is less about 2 - 3 min, but the average time for each request is 40s. It was a surprise to me that the new Elixir with the same settings as before was performing worse, even more, I’m losing some requests the HAProxy (working as reverse proxy) shows 2000 and my elixir backend app shows 1600. I even had to tweak some configuration values (to be able to finish most of the request) that I didn’t have to tweak before.

When I look at the logs locally, I see that the DBConnection Pool is switching too much between request and it is trying to execute close to 1 query on each request. So, it means that I have close to 2000 request executing little by little (I think because of this new CoDel alg). I would prefer to use a setting (If there was one) to assign a DBConnection to a request till the request finishes executing. I was looking also into DBConnection.Ownership to play with the :ownership_timeout but I also read that DBConnection.Ownership is more for tests (might have misinterpreted this)

My current settings:

	config :myapp, BeaconWeb.Endpoint,
	  http: [
		...
		protocol_options: [
		  idle_timeout: 1_200_000,
		  inactivity_timeout: 1_200_000
		]
	  ]

	config :myapp, Beacon.Repo,
      ...
	  pool_size: 100,
	  timeout: 100_000_000,
	  queue_target: 100_000_000

As additional information I’m getting this message frequently on localhost:
With DBConnection.ConnectionPool:

[info] [] Postgrex.Protocol (#PID<0.2384.0>) disconnected: ** (DBConnection.ConnectionError) client #PID<0.4135.0> exited

With DBConnection.Ownership:

[error] [] Postgrex.Protocol (#PID<0.2384.0>) disconnected: ** (DBConnection.ConnectionError) client #PID<0.4135.0> exited

Documentation I have checked:

https://ninenines.eu/docs/en/cowboy/2.5/manual/cowboy_http/

Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Showing Posts 1 to 10

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

You can do so explicitly via:

MyApp.Repo.checkout(fn ->
  # all calls made inside here will use the same connection.
end)
agacode

agacode OP

@benwilson512 Thanks for your rapid reply, I would have to do that for the whole application, the Repo is used in multiple modules. I was looking more for a global setting or so. I just upgraded the application and facing this problem, I was expecting to perform better out of the box. But I will keep that suggestion to use it in the case I cannot find anything at a global level. Thank you

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

@agacode Usually if you wanted to do that “app wide” you’d basically just do it at the controller or plug call function or whatever. Doing it app wide is a tricky concept with all the different processes running around. Most processes never even touch the database, so there has to be an explicit point at which you say “This process is checking out a database connection”.

agacode

agacode OP

@benwilson512 I’ll try that and see how it goes. What pool? regular ConnectionPool or Ownership or any other?

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

Regular. If your responses are taking 40 seconds though I’d seriously audit the database requests being made. Could you also supply the actual mechanism you’re using to benchmark?

agacode

agacode OP

If your responses are taking 40 seconds though I’d seriously audit the database requests being made

There is almost no time for refactors due to a constant business need for new features and other constraints that don’t allow the developers directly access/audit the DB.
But my comparison/baseline is the following:
old version 6s vs new version 40s (Same old code, project generated from scratch and adjusted)

Could you also supply the actual mechanism you’re using to benchmark?

We had benchee before for the old version although we haven’t run it in a very long time.

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

By benchmark I mean what are you using to generate the 2000 req / sec?

In rereading your original question, I’m curious how you’re measuring this data. If after the upgrade everything completed nearly twice as fast it seems impossible that the average request time increased by nearly a factor of 7.

agacode

agacode OP

Oh sorry I misunderstood your question, we use JMeter to do the load tests, we also have production API clients that send a big batch of requests and provide us later with the amount of requests they sent, also HAProxy is registering all the connections/requests.

Each request individually takes longer (I assume because of the amount of queries we execute within the request and it is multiplexing too much), the whole batch takes a bit less than before. Maybe there is no logical explanation for that, but those are the facts.

I will tests with Repo.checkout in a request level place and see how it goes. Thank you so much!

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

I would consider renaming the question to be more about the general performance issue you’re experiencing after upgrading by the way. Doing an explicit database checkout may help, it might also not. The issue you’re experiencing is the slowdown, there may be other avenues to approach in so far as improving that goes.

agacode

agacode OP

Done :wink:…

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews