ani

ani

I understand that the a Phoenix controller is the web interface into the bigger application, and the controllers call functions in context. Does this mean that it’s not a best practice to pass the connection struct, which is related to web interface to the contexts?

I have an endpoint that passes through a plug which checks for authentication and assigns an organization, user and token struct to the connection struct. Now, I can explicitly pass all these three values to the context or I can pass the connection struct itself. Which is better?

Thanks

Showing Posts 1 to 5

baldwindavid

baldwindavid

I would love to hear other opinions on this, but I think the key thing here would be that the contexts do not specifically know about %Plug.Conn.

You definitely don’t want this context function signature…

def create(%Plug.Conn{} = conn)

You could be less specific about it and grab things out of a struct that just happens to have the same structure as a conn if it really makes sense for your context API, but it almost surely does not…

def create(%{assigns: %{organization: organization, user: user, token: token}})

However, this is coupled to the structure of a conn and doesn’t seem like clean arguments for the context function.

You could pass just the assigns so as not to reach deeply into the struct…

def create(%{organization: organization, user: user, token: token})

But you are still reliant on how the conn is built up on the web side of your app and it is still arguable whether this is a clean way to take arguments in the context function.

Try to imagine you didn’t have a web interface for your app at all and were only designing the context function. How would you want the function signature to operate? Let that dictate what/how arguments are passed in.

For instance, maybe a function signature like this makes more sense in your app…

def create(%Organization{} = organization, %User{} = user, token})

This should be more resistant to breakage due to changes in the controller because you will have been explicit of the needs of the function at the boundaries.

kokolegorille

kokolegorille

I also avoid passing Web conn to the core.You might want to change for a Text interface later…

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

Plugs and controllers are specifically there to convert the input (being the http request) to input for functions on contexts (now no longer a http construct, but elixir values). Just like a CLI would convert argv input (usually just string values) to elixir values before querying the contexts.

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Really depends what you are after but in any case I am with @baldwindavid that you shouldn’t leak Plug.Conn to your contexts. If you need parts of your assigns / session / private conn attributes then just pass them to your context functions. I’d even advise you to trim absolutely everything from them that you don’t need directly.

If you only need :cart_id and :user_id for a given context function then I’d do this:

defmodule MyApp.WhateverController do
  def index(conn, params) do
   conn.assigns
   |> Enum.take([:cart_id, :user_id]) # Only take the pieces of info your context function needs.
   |> MyApp.Orders.do_something_with_cart_and_user() # Pipe them to the context function. 
  end
end

As an example pseudo-code.

Absolutely don’t rely on implementation details. Now you have a Plug.Conn but later you might work with Absinthe (for GraphQL endpoints) and who knows what else.

ani

ani OP

Thank you for the great explanation!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews