din_S
Phoenix performance issues with API
I’m using Phoenix to build a simple API that takes an HTTP request (JSON) and add the IP and user-agent to it and then insert it in MongoDB
def imp(conn, params) do
params=Map.put(params,"ip",conn.remote_ip |> Tuple.to_list |> Enum.join("."))
params=Map.put(params,"ua",get_req_header(conn, "user-agent"))
Mongo.insert_one(:mongo, "impression", params)
json(conn, %{})
end
and it worked well, but what really is surprising is the performance, I have implemented the same function using NodeJS and this was the responses time of both:
Node Phoenix
#1 237 ms 4s
#2 65 ms 571ms
#3 30 ms 575ms
#4 33 ms 581ms
#5 27 ms 577ms
#6 30 ms 571ms
#7 31 ms 567ms
I have read about phoenix performance and how it should respond in microseconds time.
I thought that dealing with MongoDB is the issue, so I delete the insertion code but I still get 953ms response time (the first time) and 89ms, 350ms, 69ms the other times
so why my phoenix app is not that fast?
Note: I’m using Windows and Postman
Trending in Questions
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Using Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine as an EEx.Engine is deprecated!
To compile HEEx, use Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine.compile/2 instead.
Sta...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
I am using Oban and occasionally, shortly after a deployment, a handful of jobs can fail because of dependency on other parts of the syst...
New
Hello,
I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New
@hugobarauna and I (Alex Koutmos) have been hard at work on writing a book on Nerves that takes you from simply blinking LEDs to building...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #performance











First 10 of 12 Posts
outlog
are you running phoenix in dev or in prod?
din_S
I’m running phoenix in dev, but really is it that much slow in dev?, I’m running Node in dev as well and it is not that slow
outlog
yep, much slower - also why the first request is so slow (it compiles on first request)..
for any benchmarking run in prod..
lucaong
Benchmarks should always be executed against a production mode. Development mode is very different, and it is setup for development convenience: when writing code you want changes to appear in your app without having to restart it, and other convenient things, and you normally don’t care about microsecond response time.
wanton7
code_reloader: truein dev.exs can cause this, try setting it tofalse. But you shouldn’t test response times in dev mode any way. Also I’m sure that almost no one uses Windows in production so it might not be up to par with with Unix/Linux. If you want to test response times in Windows I would use WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux) and run your app there in prod mode.din_S
Thank all of you guys.
Actually, your responses are relieving
I have tried to set
code_reloader: falseand I started to get 30 ms responses and I will benchmark the app in production mode next timesoutlog
code variations for benchmarking:
pipe the map.puts (there might more effective ways than map.put)
avoid json encoding since you are not returning anything
try other “ip to string” method (which btw also works for ipv6 down the line)
also try
conn.remote_ip |> :inet.ntoa() |> to_string()and see if it’s faster, also your current code will break on ipv6 afaik..since this seems to be a stats endpoint consider wrapping the db call in task.start, which will of course void the benchmark as endpoint will now return crazy fast - but this is what I do and would somewhat recommend for this kind of endpoint..
din_S
Thanks for this amazing reply, but could I ask about what are the other effective ways should I use because I’m using
Map.putall over my codeoutlog
personally I didn’t know any, but a bit of googling shows me to use map.merge instead of multiple “map.put” see/read Working with maps - Joy of Elixir
lucaong
Consider that we’re getting in the realm of micro-optimizations here. At the point when you add a call to MongoDB, especially if synchronous, it probably does not make sense to optimize
Map.putvs.Map.mergeand rather use whatever is more readable, as the database IO would dominate the time.