tmbb

tmbb

PhoenixWS - Websockets over Phoenix Channels

PhoenixWS - Websockets over Phoenix Channels

Source code on Github here: GitHub - tmbb/phoenix_ws: Websockets implemented over Phoenix Channels · GitHub

Phoenix channels are a great way of adding real-time features to your web applications. They are implemented over websockets, which are essentially raw TCP sockets with extra steps (like an HTTP request to initialize the connection). Phoenix channels have a lot of advantages over normal websockets, like a reconnection mechanism and authorization features, but they require a specialized client.

Often you would like to use an existing Javascript client which expects a “normal” websocket connection. There is certainly demand for a way of using raw websockets with Phoenix, which seems to be completely impossible. The recommended advice is to drop down to Cowboy, but that is extremely unergonomic and integrates poorly with the rest of your app.

I’ve hit that problem when trying to write a ShareDB backend in Elixir, with communication between server and client happening over Phoenix Channels. The ShareDB client expectes a raw websocket connection or at least a Javascript object that talks like a websocket connection, and Phoenix expects a Phoenix Channel (and by design it can’t handle anything else).

So I’ve decided to implement Websocket-like communication on top of Phoenix Channels (which are themselves implemented on top of websockets). This is a little bit wasteful, in terms of data transmission, but if at your scale this overhead is significant you probably want to reimplement the client yourself.

This library has two parts:

  • A javascript part which defines a Javascript object that implements (most of the?) Websocket API

  • An elixir part which defines a custom Phoenix Channel that talks to said Javascript object

This allows you to do things like this:

// client
import socket from "./socket"
// Import the Javascript class
import PhoenixWS from "./phoenix_ws"

function initializeChat() {
  // Build a new PhoenixWS from the phoenix socket
  const connection = new PhoenixWS(socket, "room:lobby", {});
  // Write the rest of the code as if it were a websocket
}

initializeChat();

Then, define a special channel in your app:

defmodule MyAppWeb.RoomWSChannel do
  # Note that this is not a normal Phoenix channel
  # but a PhoenixWS.Channel, which can talk to a `PhownixWS` JS object.
  use PhoenixWS.Channel

  # Join the channel as if it were a Phoenix Channel
  def join("room:" <> _, _payload, socket) do
    {:ok, socket}
  end

  # Handle messages from the Client
  def phoenix_ws_in(data, socket) do
    # This is just an echo server, so we just broadcast the same message
    # back into all the clients connected to this topic.
    #
    # Not that we broadcast with PhoenixWS.broadcast!/2 because
    # we are talking to PhoenixWS
    PhoenixWS.broadcast!(socket, data)
    {:noreply, socket}
  end
end

And now you can add this special Channel to your socket:

defmodule MyAppWeb.UserSocket do
  use Phoenix.Socket

  ## Channels
  # Add a the (special) channel you've just defined
  channel "room:*", MyAppWeb.RoomWSChannel

  def connect(_params, socket, _connect_info) do
    {:ok, socket}
  end

  def id(_socket), do: nil
end

You can find a demo here: GitHub - tmbb/phwocket_example: An example using PhoenixWS · GitHub

Because I haven’t published PhoenixWS on hex yet, it’s a little hard to add PhoenixWS’s javascript as a dependency (you can’t get it from /deps/.../phoenix_ws) as phoenix does to get its own javascript. In the project above I’ve just copied the relevant file into the JS directory.

I haven’t published anything on hex yet, because everything is still untested (I’ve only done some basic manual tests). I welcome help on how to setup some integration tests that test compatibility between PhoenixWS and raw Websockets, especially on the client.

Most Liked

josevalim

josevalim

Creator of Elixir

For completeness, Phoenix also supports direct WebSockets usage via implementing your own @behaviour Phoenix.Socket.Transport instead of use Phoenix.Socket. It was added in v1.4. :slight_smile:

13
Post #2
tmbb

tmbb

To answer my own question: Yes, Phoenix.Socket.Transport works perfectly with a normal websocket, with no need for weird custom client-side javascript objects. On the other hand, I’m finding it a bit hard to authenticate and authorize users without being very disruptive on the client. When using websockets on top of Phoenix channels I get a lot for free, like the ability to authenticate the user using tokens in the initial connection and intelligent handling of reconnections.

This is very useful for my current project, which is writing a ShareDB backend for Phoenix and Elixir - ShareDB doesn’t seem to provide any tools for authentication, authorization and reconnects. Those things must be handled with Websocket shims (like the one I’ve written that works on top of Phoenix channels), and although foregoing Phoenix channels could allow for a more lightweight solution in terms of data transmission, I’m not sure it would be a net gain. So maybe my library (and the idea behind it) is not so useless after all.

samuelventura

samuelventura

My wish list for oficial almost raw websocket support is so far:

  1. Phoenix JS client to expose raw send/onMessage methods with implicit json serializer. Phoenix js client advantages over native websocket:
  • Included fallback to long polling
  • Params passed on connect are auto encoded to URL
  • Heartbeat and auto-reconnection
  1. Test macros to bootstrap the transport based websocket (mostly to replicate all the config and params passed to connect)
  2. Code generator for a new transport websocket and transport websocket test
  3. Transport websocket with implicit JSON serializer
  4. Some form of assigns
  5. Maybe parametric routing similar to controller

This is useful for:

  • Implementing an API / RPC. An stateful API may look over kill, but imagine the server side process is a proxy to some upstream API whose data flow I need to trim/curate based on some dynamic state.
  • Implementing some form of basic view-less remote shared state (say server side Vue state with mutations over this transport). This is my current goal and seems to be the goal of tmbb/ShareDB as well.

I agree that a couple of use cases may not justify the effort to implement and maintain but it would be nice to have out of the box.

Last Post!

namxam

namxam

I would copy that. Working with Phoenix.Socket.Transport is actually quite nice. The only issue I have right now is how to properly test my implementation.

@samuelventura Do you have any test code to share? Or a hint of you you tested your implementation?

Where Next?

Popular in Announcing Top

alisinabh
Hey everyone i’ve developed a library for Jalaali calendar for elixir which supports converting Gregorian dates to Jalaali and vice vers...
New
danschultzer
In short Plug n’ play OAuth 2.0 provider library. Just set up a resource owner schema with Ecto (your user schema), install the dependen...
New
wfgilman
I’ve cleaned up and open sourced three financial libraries I was using for my company. They are bindings for the APIs of these three comp...
New
josevalim
EDIT: since Ecto 3.0 final version is out, this post was amended to use the final versions in the instructions below. Hi everyone, We a...
New
tmbb
I’ve been working on two packages (not on hex.pm yet) to build admin interfaces for phoenix apps: bureaucrat - which contains a bunch ...
New
maltoe
Hello! Came here to announce ChromicPDF, a pet project PDF generator I’ve been working on for the past few months. Why another PDF gener...
New
fuelen
Hey folks! Want to present a toolkit for writing command-line user interfaces. It provides a convenient interface for colorizing text...
New

Other popular topics Top

Qqwy
Update: How to use the Blogs &amp; Podcasts section You can post links to your blog posts or podcasts either in one of the Official Blog...
3271 130286 1222
New
nobody
Hi! In PHP: $_SERVER[‘SERVER_ADDR’] - in Elixir? Searched the docs for ip address and the web, no good results. Thanks!
New
New
aadeshere1
I have a another noob question about loop. Since elixir is immutable, while loop is not directly possible. total = 10 while total != 0 ...
New
albydarned
Hello all! I am typing this post from my new MacBook Pro with the M1 chip. I’m loving it so far, and will probably use it as my daily dr...
New
romenigld
I am trying to run a deploy with docker and I successfully runned with this command: docker build -t romenigld/blog-prod . but when I t...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement