dgigafox

dgigafox

Plan to create a seeder library

Hi guys. Would like to ask for some help cause I am new to creating libraries.
So I am currently creating an elixir library for seeding that would solve this problem:

Seeding a database is simple using seeds.exs but fairly messy and complicated when the app is huge and has a bunch of tables. For example, the project that I am working on currently is taking like 30 to 40 minutes to seed which does not count DB timeouts which you need to re-run again if it happens.

Now the interface of my library is simple. Seeders have 2 callbacks:

@callback deps() :: [atom()]
@callback run(Context.t()) :: struct() | [struct()]

deps are list of seeders that should be run before the current seeder while run returns a struct/structs. It will look something like this

defmodule UserSeed do
  use ThisLibrary, key: :user

  @impl true
  def deps, do: []

  @impl true
  def run(%ThisLibrary.Context{}) do
    {:ok, users} = ...some_insert_operation()
    users
  end
end

After this seed runs it will be put to Context.seeds with the key which can be pattern matched by other seeders next in line. Something like:

defmodule PostSeed do
  use ThisLibrary, key: :post

  @impl true
  def deps, do: [UserSeed]

  @impl true
  def run(%ThisLibrary.Context{seeds: %{users: users}}) do
    {:ok, posts} = ...some_insert_operation(users)
    posts
  end
end

Now, I would like my implementation to be using GenServers. Each seeder library is a GenServer periodically checking if all deps already ran. If all deps run then that’s the time it will call run/0 and do the DB operation. The library runs a dynamic supervisor that starts each seeder as a child. So in case of error it can save the state in whatever format (maybe database, json file, etc…), re-running the seeder library will not start from the beginning but will just run from where it stopped. Also would like to run seeders asynchronously as long as its deps are complete for faster seeding.

Question is. Is this a good implementation? Am I overcomplicating things, or am I missing something?

First 3 of 3 Posts Switch mode

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

Roughly how many rows are involved with this seed? 30-40 minutes seems like it should be tens of millions, which seems excessive.

Hitting DB timeouts suggests two things could be happening:

  • inserting too many rows in a single transaction
  • if there aren’t many rows involved, inserting things in ways that cause lock contention (unique indexes, etc)

It’s also worth investigating the database you’re seeding into - is it hitting a performance bottleneck? If so, dividing work up among GenServers is just going to mean more processes waiting for an overloaded DB.

dgigafox

dgigafox OP

@al2o3cr Thanks for the response!

Not actually 10s of millions but just estimate 40,000 rows from all tables. You are right about two things:

  • There are transactions that are taking too long thus result to DB timeout
  • If insertions will be through GenServer processes and DB is the bottleneck, the process will just wait for DB to open a connection

We need to update our seed from time to time when new features are introduced and sometimes when we update a function in the seed it can result to timeout which occurs intermittently. When we (especially QA) want a fresh seed to our database, and it times out, we need to fix the seed and re-run it from the beginning.

So I think it will be better to just run the seeds sequentially to avoid overloading the database? Also it will be easier to track where it stopped and where to fix

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

30-40 minutes to insert 40k rows seems remarkably slow; I’d recommend you start by figuring out where all that time is going. For instance, changing up your seeding workflow won’t help much if (for instance) you’re using bcrypt_elixir and inserting a lot of users with log_rounds set too high.

If you need updatable seeds, a package like phil_columns could be what you’re looking for.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next?

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
jonnycharles
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
spammy
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
silverdr
Using Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine as an EEx.Engine is deprecated! To compile HEEx, use Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine.compile/2 instead. Sta...
New
dli
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app? Looking for hints regarding: Addi...
New
bottlenecked
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps. Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
michallepicki
I am using Oban and occasionally, shortly after a deployment, a handful of jobs can fail because of dependency on other parts of the syst...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
type1fool
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New
akoutmos
@hugobarauna and I (Alex Koutmos) have been hard at work on writing a book on Nerves that takes you from simply blinking LEDs to building...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement