amnu3387

amnu3387

Poolboy substitute?

Hi, I’ve written a pooler using gen_statem, similar to poolboy but with a few differences, more control on how it can be configured (default workers, max workers (similar to overflow in poolboy) and waiting queue lenght), some more control on checking out the worker (immediate overload response, only timeout, unbound, not swallowing timeouts).

I’ve ran some tests with it and poolboy and the results are promising. What I’m wondering is if there’s any other more efficient poolers out there? Perhaps nif based? I’m asking because if not I would like to rewrite it in erlang (it’s mostly compatible with only some keyword lists for initialisation and naming which can be swapped for something else) and publish it publicly (and because poolboy is used in some public elixir libs if it was a better option it would be, well, better?).

They have slightly different semantics on how they control, the things but running poolboy with no “block”, and an :infinity timeout, against the unbound waiting queue, and 5_000 timeout, both with 100 workers, not overflow, results in this:

Interactive Elixir (1.9.0) - press Ctrl+C to exit (type h() ENTER for help)
iex(1)> Queuer.Pool.test_queuer()
:ok
Total ok: 40000 - Total failed: 0
time: 1.13
iex(2)> Queuer.Pool.test_poolboy()
:ok
Total ok: 40000 - Total failed: 0
time: 41.639

The results are consistent across all range of workloads, workers, etc.

The tests are basically:

@total_reqs 20000
  
  def test_queuer(max \\ @total_reqs)  do
    pid = Process.whereis(__MODULE__)
    time = :erlang.system_time(:millisecond)
    receiver = spawn(__MODULE__, :keep_track, [time, 0, 0])
    feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, 0, max)
    feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, 0, max)
  end

  def feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, count, max) when count < max do
    spawn(fn() ->
      case __MODULE__.checkout(pid, 5000, false) do
        {:ok, w_pid} ->
          :ok = GenServer.call(w_pid, :test)
          send(receiver, :ok)
          __MODULE__.checkin(pid, w_pid)
        error ->
          send(receiver, :failed)
          :error
      end
    end)
    feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, count + 1, max)
  end

  def feed_test_queuer(_, _, _, _), do: :ok

  def test_poolboy(max \\ @total_reqs) do
    pid = Process.whereis(:worker)
    time = :erlang.system_time(:millisecond)
    receiver = spawn(__MODULE__, :keep_track, [time, 0, 0])
    feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, 0, max)
    feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, 0, max)
  end

  def feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, count, max) when count < max do
    spawn(fn() ->
      case :poolboy.checkout(pid, true, :infinity) do
        :full ->
          send(receiver, :failed)
          :error
        w_pid ->
          :ok = GenServer.call(w_pid, :test)
          send(receiver, :ok)
          :poolboy.checkin(pid, w_pid)
      end
    end)
    feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, count + 1, max)
  end

  def feed_test_poolboy(_, _, _, _), do: :ok
 
   def keep_track(time, c, f) when (c + f) == @total_reqs do
    time_now = :erlang.system_time(:millisecond)
    IO.puts("Total ok: #{c} - Total failed: #{f}")
    IO.inspect(((time_now - time) / 1000), label: "time")
  end
  
  def keep_track(time, count, failed) do
    receive do
      :ok -> keep_track(time, count + 1, failed)
      :failed -> keep_track(time, count, failed + 1)
    after
      10_000 ->
        :ok
    end
  end

In short, checkout a worker, call it for :ok, send a message to the “tracker”.
The worker module is:

defmodule WorkerTest do
  use GenServer

   def start_link do
    GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, nil, [])
  end
  
  def start_link(_) do
    GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, nil, [])
  end

  def init(_) do
    {:ok, nil}
  end

  def handle_call(:test, _from, state) do
    {:reply, :ok, state}
  end
end

(it has two start_links, because my queuer is passing 0 args to it)
Can you see something wrong with the way I’m testing both implementations?

First Post!

hauleth

hauleth

Have you read @ferd’s article about handling overload?

Last Post!

amnu3387

amnu3387

I think so, but the unbound queue here is just to simulate the behaviour of poolboy, the error/overflow control is more fine grained than in poolboy, where checking out the worker is always a max timeout no matter if it’s overloaded or not, and always makes the call (and can only know if it’s overloaded after the call returns or timeouts). In this queuer you can bail out immediately on overload, only bail out after X, bail out after X OR overload, and/or have a 0 max waiting queue, an unbound queue or a finite queue.

[edit] - the timeout is not hardcoded in poolboy duh

Where Next?

Popular in Discussions Top

scouten
I’m looking for a host for the server part of a small (personal) side project that I’m working on. It’s currently written in Node.js and ...
New
AstonJ
Are there any Elixir or Erlang libraries that help with this? I’ve been thinking how streaming services like twitch have exploded recentl...
New
acrolink
How does the two languages compare when it comes to server side application development? Any experiences or ideas? Thank you.
New
jer
I’ve been using umbrellas for a while, and generally started off (on greenfield projects at least) by isolating subapps based on clearly ...
New
tmbb
This is a post to discuss the new Phoenix LiveView functionality. From Chris’s talk, it appears that they generate all HTML on the serve...
342 18595 126
New
mikl
I wanted to capitalize a string, and tried using String.capitalize(). That generally works well, until you try to capitalize a word like...
New
sergio
Kind of like when jquery came out, it was super necessary. Existing drag and drop libraries have a bunch of baggage to support old browse...
New

Other popular topics Top

JeremM34
Hello, how can I check the Phoenix version ? Thanks !
New
vertexbuffer
Hello, can anybody help here..? I have a list of players and I what to delete an element, but every for loop the list is reverting to ori...
New
dokuzbir
I want to highlight html closing tags when i click a html tag. That works in .html files but doesnt work for html.eex templates. How can...
New
shijith.k
I am trying to start a new phoenix project with elixir 1.9, but mix phx.new does not work. It says that ** (Mix) The task "phx.new" could...
New
SoCreat
i’m a new one to elixir which editor can i use vs code? or atom? Thanks! :smiley:
New
Patoshizzle
After calling mix ecto.create I get this error: 17:00:32.162 [error] GenServer #PID&lt;0.412.0&gt; terminating ** (Postgrex.Error) FATAL...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement