amnu3387

amnu3387

Hi, I’ve written a pooler using gen_statem, similar to poolboy but with a few differences, more control on how it can be configured (default workers, max workers (similar to overflow in poolboy) and waiting queue lenght), some more control on checking out the worker (immediate overload response, only timeout, unbound, not swallowing timeouts).

I’ve ran some tests with it and poolboy and the results are promising. What I’m wondering is if there’s any other more efficient poolers out there? Perhaps nif based? I’m asking because if not I would like to rewrite it in erlang (it’s mostly compatible with only some keyword lists for initialisation and naming which can be swapped for something else) and publish it publicly (and because poolboy is used in some public elixir libs if it was a better option it would be, well, better?).

They have slightly different semantics on how they control, the things but running poolboy with no “block”, and an :infinity timeout, against the unbound waiting queue, and 5_000 timeout, both with 100 workers, not overflow, results in this:

Interactive Elixir (1.9.0) - press Ctrl+C to exit (type h() ENTER for help)
iex(1)> Queuer.Pool.test_queuer()
:ok
Total ok: 40000 - Total failed: 0
time: 1.13
iex(2)> Queuer.Pool.test_poolboy()
:ok
Total ok: 40000 - Total failed: 0
time: 41.639

The results are consistent across all range of workloads, workers, etc.

The tests are basically:

@total_reqs 20000
  
  def test_queuer(max \\ @total_reqs)  do
    pid = Process.whereis(__MODULE__)
    time = :erlang.system_time(:millisecond)
    receiver = spawn(__MODULE__, :keep_track, [time, 0, 0])
    feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, 0, max)
    feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, 0, max)
  end

  def feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, count, max) when count < max do
    spawn(fn() ->
      case __MODULE__.checkout(pid, 5000, false) do
        {:ok, w_pid} ->
          :ok = GenServer.call(w_pid, :test)
          send(receiver, :ok)
          __MODULE__.checkin(pid, w_pid)
        error ->
          send(receiver, :failed)
          :error
      end
    end)
    feed_test_queuer(pid, receiver, count + 1, max)
  end

  def feed_test_queuer(_, _, _, _), do: :ok

  def test_poolboy(max \\ @total_reqs) do
    pid = Process.whereis(:worker)
    time = :erlang.system_time(:millisecond)
    receiver = spawn(__MODULE__, :keep_track, [time, 0, 0])
    feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, 0, max)
    feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, 0, max)
  end

  def feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, count, max) when count < max do
    spawn(fn() ->
      case :poolboy.checkout(pid, true, :infinity) do
        :full ->
          send(receiver, :failed)
          :error
        w_pid ->
          :ok = GenServer.call(w_pid, :test)
          send(receiver, :ok)
          :poolboy.checkin(pid, w_pid)
      end
    end)
    feed_test_poolboy(pid, receiver, count + 1, max)
  end

  def feed_test_poolboy(_, _, _, _), do: :ok
 
   def keep_track(time, c, f) when (c + f) == @total_reqs do
    time_now = :erlang.system_time(:millisecond)
    IO.puts("Total ok: #{c} - Total failed: #{f}")
    IO.inspect(((time_now - time) / 1000), label: "time")
  end
  
  def keep_track(time, count, failed) do
    receive do
      :ok -> keep_track(time, count + 1, failed)
      :failed -> keep_track(time, count, failed + 1)
    after
      10_000 ->
        :ok
    end
  end

In short, checkout a worker, call it for :ok, send a message to the “tracker”.
The worker module is:

defmodule WorkerTest do
  use GenServer

   def start_link do
    GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, nil, [])
  end
  
  def start_link(_) do
    GenServer.start_link(__MODULE__, nil, [])
  end

  def init(_) do
    {:ok, nil}
  end

  def handle_call(:test, _from, state) do
    {:reply, :ok, state}
  end
end

(it has two start_links, because my queuer is passing 0 args to it)
Can you see something wrong with the way I’m testing both implementations?

Showing Posts 1 to 2

hauleth

hauleth

Have you read @ferd’s article about handling overload?

amnu3387

amnu3387 OP

I think so, but the unbound queue here is just to simulate the behaviour of poolboy, the error/overflow control is more fine grained than in poolboy, where checking out the worker is always a max timeout no matter if it’s overloaded or not, and always makes the call (and can only know if it’s overloaded after the call returns or timeouts). In this queuer you can bail out immediately on overload, only bail out after X, bail out after X OR overload, and/or have a 0 max waiting queue, an unbound queue or a finite queue.

[edit] - the timeout is not hardcoded in poolboy duh

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Discussions Top

AstonJ
The obligatory hello world thread! Who are you and where are you from? :stuck_out_tongue:
4663 61218 595
New
cblavier
Hey there, It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
515 12931 101
New
wmnnd
Hey folks, I wanted to share with you a project I’ve been working on for a while: It’s an Open Source (AGPLv3) newsletter tool. Think Ma...
New
raa-ziq
Hi everyone :waving_hand: I wanted to share something I’ve been building — NowBlind, a random chat app designed to help people discover ...
New
sntran
In my third year of college, around 2010, I found Erlang. A few years later, I found Elixir. I liked the ideas at once: many small proces...
New
Ganna
Hi everyone, I have 8 years of production experience with Erlang/OTP and I’m just starting to get to know Elixir. What would you learn f...
New
gtcode
I’ve been tinkering with Lynx (by José) via hold_ledger. I used AI to write the code, a separate specification, the tests, and the Lean p...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
kip
Localize is the next generation localisation library for Elixir. Think of it as ex_cldr version 3.0. The first version will be released ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews