flmel

flmel

Hello Everyone,
I’m trying to make Pow register form validation trough LiveView which I more or less succeeded at. However, upon user creation pow normally would log the user trough the plug:
from pow docs

 def create(conn, %{"user" => user_params}) do
    conn
    |> Pow.Plug.create_user(user_params)
    |> case do
      {:ok, user, conn} ->
        conn
        |> put_flash(:info, "Welcome!")
        |> redirect(to: Routes.page_path(conn, :index))
       ...
   end

My LiveView event currently looks like this (i had to create a custom function create_user in order to escape the conn needed for the Plug but now Im trying to figure out how to log in the user on creation…

def handle_event("save", %{"user" => user_params}, socket) do
    case Accounts.create_user(user_params) do
      {:ok, _user} ->
        # Form is valid
        {:stop,
         socket
         |> put_flash(:info, "user created")  
         |> redirect(to: Routes.live_path(socket, MyApp.SearchLive))}
..

So basically is there a way to pass the conn trough my liveview or i shall copy/write the entire functionality myself.

@danschultzer somewhere in the forum you’ve mentioned that you would put a demo with liveview did you ever get around to do that ?

Thanks for your time

Showing Posts 1 to 10

andreaseriksson

andreaseriksson

Why do you want this in a LiveView?

flmel

flmel OP

Very good question, this was a task given to me by a “mentor”. Initially I got that as to validate the form on the fly and I believe most of the app would move into liveview and the form would expand.

PS. looking into your profile its the first time i get to know about fullstackphoenix. Thank you for your time keeping this up

andreaseriksson

andreaseriksson

Thanks.

I can’t say for sure its a bad idea to have a live validation on the registration (or login) form but it seems overly complicated and could be a security risk. Especially if you check for if email is already used. I just can’t see the upside other than learning how it works behind the scenes.

Schultzer

Schultzer

I don’t want to ruin your learning experience but take a look at the pow/lib/pow/phoenix/controllers/registration_controller.ex at main · pow-auth/pow · GitHub

I would also go through this issue Instructions for WebSocket usage (e.g. Phoenix Channels and LiveView) · Issue #271 · pow-auth/pow · GitHub

The last thing you want to figure out is the differences between session and token based authentications and how to handle session based authentication in a LiveView socket.

danschultzer

danschultzer

Pow Core Team

You can’t set cookies in a WebSocket. You have to pass the session id value to the client and set up some custom JS client side that will set it as a cookie. There’s some security issues too. I would recommend that you only deal with auth in HTTP.

Haven’t gotten to it yet. I’m trying out a Pow implementation with Phoenix.Socket though, hopefully can take what I learn from that and add it to the Pow docs/code :slight_smile:

flmel

flmel OP

Thank you everyone!

chrismccord

chrismccord

Creator of Phoenix

This is one of the usecases I have highlighted all along for where LV shines. Imagine a registration form where you necessarily want to improve UX because it directly increases conversions. You want to give the user feedback as soon as possible when they are trying to sign up, so realtime validations are essential, but LV allows you to add it without bringing int a client side solution and all the baggage that comes with it. The outstanding issues with a full LiveView signin or registration form is the cookie session writing on login or sign up. This can’t happen over websockts so folks have two options.

  • Use phx-change on the form, but allow the regular form post to hit a controller that performs put_session
  • Use LV for phx-change and phx-submit, and perform a redirect to a session controller, with a signed token which is used to call put_session to write the session

So LV is can be used here without any of the mentioned security issues. You are of course free to use regular controllers if that’s a better fit :slight_smile:

13
Post #7
flmel

flmel OP

What I was thinking was just use the validation and post it to the pow custom controller. Thank you Chris. And exactly one of the reasons to use LV on such a simple task is the added “user value”.

Now that LV approaches v1 thanks to all the work you put in. I think it will be great to put some beginner friendly documentation. I hope I will get to the level being able to contribute back.

ondrej-tucek

ondrej-tucek

You want to give the user feedback as soon as possible when they are trying to sign up, so realtime validations are essential

You mean something like that? :slight_smile:

andreaseriksson

andreaseriksson

Sure, I know how LV validations works. I was just imagine a more simple use case where you add email and password, since Pow was mentioned. And for that use case, I think LV is overkill.

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
itzmidinesh
Hi all, I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
csmr
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley: Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Stef-Verniers
Hello I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

dominicletz
Hey there, I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first. ...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
OndrejValenta
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly) AI dream has many faces, but general...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews