orsinium
I have 2 live components on the same page, one for pagination and another for search. Both write their state into URL query params which are later handled by the live controller.
def handle_event("pagination", %{"page" => _} = params, socket) do
path = ITJWeb.Router.Helpers.live_path(socket, ITJWeb.OffersLive, params)
socket = push_patch(socket, to: path)
{:noreply, socket}
end
def handle_event("offer_search", %{"search" => search}, socket) do
path = ITJWeb.Router.Helpers.live_path(socket, ITJWeb.OffersLive, search)
socket = push_patch(socket, to: path)
{:noreply, socket}
end
def mount(params, _session, socket) do
{:noreply, socket} = handle_params(params, nil, socket)
{:ok, socket}
end
def handle_params(params, _uri, socket) do
...
{:noreply, socket}
end
The issue is that each component resets all existing query params. In other words, when you change the page, the search gets reset. There is a live demo: itj.orsinium.dev/offers.
The issue is that live_path requires all query params to be explicitly passed as a third argument but the existing query params (if I understand correctly) are not passed into handle_event.
- Is there a way to get current URL query params inside
handle_event? - Is there a way to do
live_path+push_patchwith preserving the current URL query params? - Should I approach the whole problem differently? Is
handle_eventof a live component a good place to modify URL or should I delegate it to the controller somehow?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
URLs are essentially global/shared state for all liveviews/components on a single page, so my suggestion is to consolidate modification of that state in a single place. A.k.a instead of your search or pagination component doing a push_patch let them trigger something on the parent liveview, which is aware of the current state of the URL and can “add” the changes on top.
cmo
What’s with calling
handle_paramsfrom withinmount?handle_paramsis called by the system. If you add someIO.inspectorLogger.debugcommands inmountandhandle_paramsyou’ll see when and in what order it all happens.orsinium
Thank you for your reply! By sending messages as described in LiveView as the source of truth? It seems like a good idea and matching what docs say. They also explicitly say I can do live patches there, though, which confused me.
orsinium
Thank you, good catch. Somehow I thought
handle_paramsis only executed when you update params, not when you load the page. Now I see my assumption was wrong. I’ll update the code.cmo
Or writing them as Function Components. Then you handle the event in the liveview. None of your components are managing their own state so could be Function Components.
orsinium
That also might be a good idea. My motivation was to encapsulate into components handling of events generated by the components and live to the controller only dealing with URL queries. It seems like a good separation but now I’m not sure if it’s worth it. There are just a few lines of code in components anyway, not a big deal. I’m not sure if it will solve the issue, though, since
LiveView.handle_eventaccepts all the same arguments asLiveComponent.handle_eventand so also can’t preserve query params on URL patches.orsinium
I still can’t wrap my head around how to update the existing URL query.
LiveView.handle_eventaccepts all the same params asLiveComponent.handle_eventLiveView.handle_info(which I can trigger withsendfromLiveComponent) also doesn’t know anything about the current URL query.The best I have in mind is to pass the query params in
assignsof all components but then, I suppose, it will re-render the whole page, and then what’s even the point of having LiveView. And also it’s messy and easy to get out of sync. I’m wondering why the current URL isn’t in the socket in the first place.UPD: what I mean is that I see many ways how to update the LiveView state for different kinds of events but I can’t see a clean way to keep the URL query in sync with these changes.
cmo
That’s certainly not the case. I have a LiveView that I set myriad URL query params on and they don’t get overridden. Though I keep the
paramsinassignsso maybe I’m telling a fibWhen you’re using the URL query params, you use
handle_paramsto handle assigning anything that is associated with them. You don’tassignorupdatethem elsewhere (i.e. inhandle_eventorhandle_info). If you want to change them, you usepush_patch.You might find Sophie’s article on the topic useful, though she doesn’t seem to use
push_patch.Sleepful
Just the friendly reminder to use
mix phx.routesto figure out theRoutes.function for your path; instead ofRoutes.live_path.Related:
cmo
You’d probably use verified routes once you hit phoenix 1.7.