ug0

ug0

Problem with testing bulk inserts with Task.async_stream

I have code to do bulk insert which looks like this:

stream = build_attrs_stream()

Repo.transaction(fn ->
  stream
  |> Stream.chunk_every(5000)
  |> Task.async_stream(fn batch ->
    {n, _} = Repo.insert_all(Assignment, batch)
    n
  end, ordered: false)
  |> Enum.reduce(0, fn {:ok, n}, acc -> acc + n end)
end)

The above code works fine until I run the test, which gives me error:

(EXIT from #PID<0.544.0>) an exception was raised:
         ** (DBConnection.ConnectionError) connection not available and request was dropped from queue after 939ms. You can configure how long requests wait in the queue using :queue_target and :queue_interval. See DBConnection.start_link/2 for more information

I’m using Phoenix v1.4 and Ecto v3.1, database is Postgres.
Any help?

Most Liked

benwilson512

benwilson512

Author of Craft GraphQL APIs in Elixir with Absinthe

Hey @ug0 this is because of how the ecto sandbox works during tests. Each test process is provided its own database connection. The Task.async_stream call spawns new processes, and ecto doesn’t know which connection to use. You can solve this by giving Ecto a little more information:

stream = build_attrs_stream()

parent = self()

Repo.transaction(fn ->
  stream
  |> Stream.chunk_every(5000)
  |> Task.async_stream(fn batch ->
    {n, _} = Repo.insert_all(Assignment, batch, caller: parent)
    n
  end, ordered: false)
  |> Enum.reduce(0, fn {:ok, n}, acc -> acc + n end)
end)

The change here is the addition of caller: parent as options to the Repo call.

Last Post!

gmile

gmile

Sorry for necro-posting. This is how I solved the issue combining Repo.stream and Task.async_stream with in my case.

Below is a self-contained script that will hang:

Mix.install([
  {:ecto_sql, "~> 3.10"},
  {:postgrex, ">= 0.0.0"}
])

Application.put_env(:myapp, Repo, database: "repo_stream_example", pool: Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox)

defmodule Repo do
  use Ecto.Repo, adapter: Ecto.Adapters.Postgres, otp_app: :myapp
end

defmodule Main do
  def my_fun do
    import Ecto.Query

    Repo.transaction(fn ->
      from(n in fragment("SELECT generate_series(1, 3) AS n"), select: n.n)
      |> Repo.stream()
      |> Task.async_stream(fn number ->
        # this hangs
        Repo.query!("select $1 + 1", [number]).rows
      end)
      |> Enum.to_list()
    end)
  end

  def main do
    Repo.__adapter__().storage_down(Repo.config())
    :ok = Repo.__adapter__().storage_up(Repo.config())
    {:ok, _} = Repo.start_link([])
  end
end

ExUnit.start()

defmodule MainTest do
  use ExUnit.Case

  setup do
    :ok = Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.checkout(Repo)
    Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.mode(Repo, {:shared, self()})
    :ok
  end
  
  test "the insides of my_fun hang" do
    assert {:ok, [ok: [[2]], ok: [[3]], ok: [[4]]]} = Main.my_fun()
  end
end

Main.main()
ExUnit.run()

Make the following change:

diff --git a/hang-repro.exs b/hang-repro.exs
index 3be69f09da..1bf6f76929 100644
--- a/hang-repro.exs
+++ b/hang-repro.exs
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ defmodule Main do
       from(n in fragment("SELECT generate_series(1, 3) AS n"), select: n.n)
       |> Repo.stream()
       |> Task.async_stream(fn number ->
-        # this hangs
         Repo.query!("select $1 + 1", [number]).rows
       end)
       |> Enum.to_list()
@@ -35,14 +34,8 @@ ExUnit.start()

 defmodule MainTest do
   use ExUnit.Case
-
-  setup do
-    :ok = Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.checkout(Repo)
-    Ecto.Adapters.SQL.Sandbox.mode(Repo, {:shared, self()})
-    :ok
-  end

-  test "the insides of my_fun hang" do
+  test "the insides of my_fun don't hang anymore" do
     assert {:ok, [ok: [[2]], ok: [[3]], ok: [[4]]]} = Main.my_fun()
   end
 end

This way a default value for Sandbox mode is used, which is :auto. The script will now run to completion.

I think it’s important to be mention, however, that the code inside Task.async_stream will not run inside the same transaction, and won’t be automatically rolled back at the end of the test. So any data inserted in the DB during the test will have to be cleaned up manually. But that’s OK in my case.

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

New
lanycrost
Hi everyone! I need implement if…else if…else condition from my elixir code, and anymore of this control flow structures not work proper...
New
Lily
In templates/appointment/index.html.eex: &lt;%= for appointment &lt;- @appointments do %&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td&gt;&lt;%= appoi...
New
nsuchy
Hi. I’ve noticed that Windows Powershell has it’s own IEX command and you cannot access Elixir’s IEX due to the conflict. This isn’t a cr...
New
aalberti333
As the title describes, I’m trying to run Enum.map() over a list of key/value pairs, where the value is a map. My data looks like this: ...
New
stefanluptak
Hello everybody, usually, I use a 29" ultra-wide monitor for VSCode which can easily accomodate explorer (files panel) + file with code ...
New
vrod
I am using the Starship cross-shell prompt – it seems pretty nice, but I get some errors: [WARN] - (starship::utils): Executing command ...
New

Other popular topics Top

vertexbuffer
Hello, can anybody help here..? I have a list of players and I what to delete an element, but every for loop the list is reverting to ori...
New
stefanchrobot
What’s the safe way to decode a JSON string into a struct? I want to avoid calling String.to_atom. Jason.decode can give me a map with st...
New
aadeshere1
I have a another noob question about loop. Since elixir is immutable, while loop is not directly possible. total = 10 while total != 0 ...
New
joeerl
Hello again - after a longish gap I’ve decided I really must dig into Elixir and see what’s been happening here - so I have a few questio...
New
AstonJ
Seen any cool LiveView demos, sample apps or examples? Please post them here! :003:
New
JorisKok
I have a server on AWS, and was running a load test using artillery. When looking at the Phoenix dashboard I see the Ports going to 100% ...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement