silviurosu
I have some public API’s that I want to restrict with tokens. Basically I want to allow API calls only if the client has an active token. Each token will be restricted to a host or a list of hosts.
I am not sure about implementation though.
My thoughts are to have a Phoenix plug that will verify the token from header. Will search for token in database then will match the request host and will continue if everything is fine. Also I would like to log the request to be able to do graphs and statistics later.
My API though has a high request rate (tens per second or more). I do not want that the token validation to be a bottleneck though. Since I need to rely on database calls and regex matches I am not sure about the impact. Also I need to count each request in database after the call.
One optimisation would be to keep the token in memory for a while after loading it from DB, or to load all the tokens at the application start (This can lead to stale data though). Also I have a cluster of nodes and I want to rate limit for all together.
Did somebody encountered the same use-case? Can you share your thoughts if you have different ideas?
Where Next?
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Latest Phoenix Threads
Latest on Elixir Forum
Sponsor Spotlight
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex
Our Sponsors
Build Elixir applications with speed and confidence.
Supporting innovation across the BEAM ecosystem.
We build reliable cloud platforms for business-critical systems.
Catch errors, track performance, monitor hosts and more.
Error tracking, logs, uptime, and Just Enough APM. Built for developers.
Practical resources that improve the lives of professional developers.
Develop your skills with books, videos, and courses.
Bringing learning, work and compliance together since 1987.
The team behind Membrane, Popcorn, LiveDebugger. Available for hire.
Courses that'll move you from confusion to "Aha, now I get it!"
First 7 of 7 Posts
kokolegorille
You should not need to query the database, decoding the token should provide You this info…
silviurosu
How can I do that since my token is not obtained via login like JWT? Is a generated token that I share with the customer. Similar to google API key. I can revoke the token from database anytime.
kokolegorille
You could provide them with a Phoenix Token… which is encrypted with user/host info, and only decryptable on the backend. In fact, using the db defeat the purpose of using token.
But if You want to provide something like API key, and You want to use database to check the validity, You also can.
hauleth
Not possible if you also want to provide token revocation. Sooner or later it will require the DB check. You can use signed tokens for preliminary elimination of obviously invalid tokens. Alternatively stateless tokens could be used if, and only if, the lifetime of such token would be very short (like half an hour).
kokolegorille
Yes, if You need to revoke token You need a db, like guardian db does…
I also remember someone on the forum made a package to white/black list tokens (in memory), but cannot remember the name
hauleth
DB of the revoked tokens is IMHO much worse idea than DB of allowed tokens. The later gives us useful tools like allowing user to list all their current tokens, review last usage of them, etc. Guardian DB is a hack because JWT is terrible solution for sessions.
chasers
Yep.
Want to give Logflare a try?
Cache them in ETS. Either prepopulate and bust the cache or TTL them. Cachex has a nice TTL feature. If you have lots of api keys with a highly variable rate a TTL may not be optimal as you still might get a lot of requests to the db if you have a lot of infrequent api key usage.
Use erlang’s counters. Persist to the db as needed.
If you’re not showing the rate limit data anywhere in your UI I would just have a per node rate limit and not deal with any of this. But…
I managed to get Phoenix Tracker working to send rate limit data around the cluster multiple times per second but I wouldn’t recommend that.
I need to play with this a bit more but probably persist your counters per node per api token. Or maybe use pubsub to pass around the data and cache it on each node for each node. Again, really only if you need to cluster totals for some reason, otherwise just do per node limits.