apr
Hello!
Sorry if this is obvious, but I couldn’t find an answer in the docs.
I am using the Cachex library. How does one go about locking a row? Is it done via transaction/4? Is there a more lightweight version where I can just lock a row, perform some operation, and then unlock it?
Thanks!
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 7- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
OvermindDL1
If by locking a row you mean locking a key/value entry? That would be an Action Block. The execution block just runs the code in the context of the cache itself, thus much faster, though not transactional across ‘everything’, the transactional is transactional on the state of the cache however. Or are you referencing something?
apr
Yes! Sorry for not being clear, I mean locking writes (but not reads) for a certain key.
So Action block would be the way to go? Basically I want to do something like:
Looks like Action Block suggests using execute/3. But I am not sure I see how it would prevent other processes from overwriting the key’s value in between the read and write.
OvermindDL1
That’s what the Action Block
transactionwould be.executejust runs in the cache process for speed, but does not synchronization, transaction is what does synchronization.apr
Cool! So just to confirm, that is
Cachex.transaction/4right?Thanks!
OvermindDL1
Or
/3if no options needed yep:https://hexdocs.pm/cachex/action-blocks.html#transaction-blocks
apr
Perfect, thanks @OvermindDL1!
apr
Just for posterity’s sake,
Cachex.get_and_update/4has an implicit transaction underneath. So for this particular operation, transactions are not needed, but @OvermindDL1 's answer is the way to go for operations that do need transactions.