apr
Hello!
Sorry if this is obvious, but I couldn’t find an answer in the docs.
I am using the Cachex library. How does one go about locking a row? Is it done via transaction/4? Is there a more lightweight version where I can just lock a row, perform some operation, and then unlock it?
Thanks!
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 7- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
OvermindDL1
If by locking a row you mean locking a key/value entry? That would be an Action Block. The execution block just runs the code in the context of the cache itself, thus much faster, though not transactional across ‘everything’, the transactional is transactional on the state of the cache however. Or are you referencing something?
apr
Yes! Sorry for not being clear, I mean locking writes (but not reads) for a certain key.
So Action block would be the way to go? Basically I want to do something like:
Looks like Action Block suggests using execute/3. But I am not sure I see how it would prevent other processes from overwriting the key’s value in between the read and write.
OvermindDL1
That’s what the Action Block
transactionwould be.executejust runs in the cache process for speed, but does not synchronization, transaction is what does synchronization.apr
Cool! So just to confirm, that is
Cachex.transaction/4right?Thanks!
OvermindDL1
Or
/3if no options needed yep:https://hexdocs.pm/cachex/action-blocks.html#transaction-blocks
apr
Perfect, thanks @OvermindDL1!
apr
Just for posterity’s sake,
Cachex.get_and_update/4has an implicit transaction underneath. So for this particular operation, transactions are not needed, but @OvermindDL1 's answer is the way to go for operations that do need transactions.