ekosz

ekosz

Hi there, I have the following Reactor code:

defmodule CreateNewAccount do
  use Reactor, extensions: [Ash.Reactor]
  alias Accounts.Account

  ash do
    default_domain Accounts
  end

  input(:email)
  input(:email_is_verified?)

  create :account, Account do
    inputs %{
      email: input(:email),
      email_is_verified?: input(:email_is_verified?)
    } do
      transform(fn input ->
        input
        |> Map.drop([:email_is_verified?])
        |> Map.put(
          :email_verified_at,
          if input[:email_is_verified] do
            nil
          else
            DateTime.now()
          end
        )
      end)
    end
  end
end

But I’m getting the following error

Compiling 2 files (.ex)

== Compilation error in file lib/create_new_account.ex ==
** (Spark.Error.DslError) [CreateNewAccount]
reactor -> create -> account:
  The create step `:account refers to an input named `email_is_verified?` which doesn't exist.

Did you mean `updated_at`, `created_at`, `id`, `email` or `email_verified_at`?

Looks like the DSL isn’t recognizing that I’m transforming the input. Is this a bug or am I just doing something incorrect?

Thank you!

Showing Posts 1 to 5

zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

Took me a while to notice this :slight_smile:

The error message is confusing here due to the overloaded term “input”. What reactor is doing here is telling you that the create action on Account that it is calling does not accept an input called email_is_verified?.

So you’d need either an argument on that action or to accept that field as input using accept to resolve this error.

ekosz

ekosz OP

Hi @zachdaniel ! I get that, but aren’t I transforming the input using the transform option to remove the :email_is_verified? option and add a :email_verified_at (which it does accept)?

Or is that not what the transform option does?

zachdaniel

zachdaniel

Creator of Ash

Ah, right. @jimsynz i think with the transform option we’d have to disable the check for the input map keys wouldn’t we?

jimsynz

jimsynz

Ash Core Team

Yeah that makes sense. We can’t validate the keys statically if the input is being transformed. @ekosz do you mind opening an issue on ash (it’s an Ash.Reactor bug) and I’ll tackle it once I am back from my holiday. In the mean time you can move that behaviour into a change on the underlying action or process it as a seperate step so that the input map has the correct keys.

ekosz

ekosz OP

Sounds good! Created the issue here: Issue · GitHub

Let me know if you would like me to add any additional context

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
achenet
Hello, I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind. However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Cxx-mlr
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution: data = %{ name: "Periodic Table", category:...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews