CommandoSev
How to write a recursive function, which iterates over a list and checks if an element is in that list in elixir?
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex











Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
andrewb
You can use the Enum.any?. There is excellent documentation.
Or you can roll your own.
Essentially, you are doing your check and calling with the remainder of the list. I recommend looking at the Enum library it has everything you need.
CommandoSev
What exactly is data in that code?
andrewb
@CommandoSev it is a list acting as an accumulator. Here are some examples:
You can replicate the
Enum.reducefunction by writing your own recursive function:Hope this helps. If you tell us exactly what you are trying to do I am sure we can help work it out.
Andrew
kip
If you are new to list recursion then you might find this a way to understand the concept. Given a arbitrary list
[:a, :b, :elixir, :c, :d], recursing over the items in this list is conceptually like saying “process the first element of the list, then process the rest of the list”.In Elixir that looks like:
Here the recursion is a very obvious implementation of the description. Process the first element, then process the rest of the list. Its recursive because the function is calling itself.
Will this work? It will to an extent. But what happens if the list is empty? Then there is no
firstand the function will raise an exception. So we need to cater for the empty list. And in this implementation there will always be an empty list because eventually there is norestwhen the function recurses to the end. Therefore:This is the simplest form of recursion (and I personally think its the most beautiful) but it won’t cater for all requirements. This form will always return a list the same length as the original list. In your case thats not what you want and therefore an accumulator may be required is order to build a new list. Which is what the great examples from @andrewb do.
Aetherus
The recursive thinking:
So the code is
eksperimental
There is a special case when the list has only one element, where the rest of the list will be
[]. You don’t need to match against[head]since[head | rest]will work, but just to keep that in mindOnce you learn how to iterate recursively over a list, study how
Enum.reduce/3andEnum.reduce_while/3work because pretty much everything can be implemented with these two functions. For example, your initial question could be implemented with reduce_while.