CommandoSev
How to write a recursive function, which iterates over a list and checks if an element is in that list in elixir?
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #performance











Showing Posts 1 to 6- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
andrewb
You can use the Enum.any?. There is excellent documentation.
Or you can roll your own.
Essentially, you are doing your check and calling with the remainder of the list. I recommend looking at the Enum library it has everything you need.
CommandoSev
What exactly is data in that code?
andrewb
@CommandoSev it is a list acting as an accumulator. Here are some examples:
You can replicate the
Enum.reducefunction by writing your own recursive function:Hope this helps. If you tell us exactly what you are trying to do I am sure we can help work it out.
Andrew
kip
If you are new to list recursion then you might find this a way to understand the concept. Given a arbitrary list
[:a, :b, :elixir, :c, :d], recursing over the items in this list is conceptually like saying “process the first element of the list, then process the rest of the list”.In Elixir that looks like:
Here the recursion is a very obvious implementation of the description. Process the first element, then process the rest of the list. Its recursive because the function is calling itself.
Will this work? It will to an extent. But what happens if the list is empty? Then there is no
firstand the function will raise an exception. So we need to cater for the empty list. And in this implementation there will always be an empty list because eventually there is norestwhen the function recurses to the end. Therefore:This is the simplest form of recursion (and I personally think its the most beautiful) but it won’t cater for all requirements. This form will always return a list the same length as the original list. In your case thats not what you want and therefore an accumulator may be required is order to build a new list. Which is what the great examples from @andrewb do.
Aetherus
The recursive thinking:
So the code is
eksperimental
There is a special case when the list has only one element, where the rest of the list will be
[]. You don’t need to match against[head]since[head | rest]will work, but just to keep that in mindOnce you learn how to iterate recursively over a list, study how
Enum.reduce/3andEnum.reduce_while/3work because pretty much everything can be implemented with these two functions. For example, your initial question could be implemented with reduce_while.