derek-zhou
Is it possible to have a Surface component that instantiates itself from within (conditionally, of course)
I was trying to do this in mail_node.sface:
<MailNode :for={{ id <- MailClient.children(@mail_client, @id) }}
props={{ id: id,
meta: MailClient.mail_meta(@mail_client, id),
mail_client: @mail_client }} />
Ant it complains:
** (CompileError) lib/liv_web/live/mail_node.sface:8: you are trying to use the module LivWeb.MailNode which is currently being defined.
If this is not possible, how do I model a recursive data structure like a tree with surface component?
Trending in Discussions
As the title says, please share what you’ve been up to with Elixir. Whether that’s been learning it, looking into it, making stuff with i...
New
Hey there,
It’s been more than a year since we started using LiveView as our main UI library and building a whole library of UI componen...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Quite interesting article Google brought me. Didn’t find any mentions about it here.
What do you think in general? Would you use togethe...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
Hi there! :wave:
@frigidcode and I (but mostly him) have been running an Elixir Book club, we’re almost done with Designing Elixir Syste...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Just published claude-code-elixir, a plugin marketplace for Claude Code with Elixir support. These are the plugins I’ve been using for my...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
msaraiva
Hi @derek-zhou!
Currently, Surface does not allow using a component recursively. However, you can work around this issue by moving the recursion to a separate function. For instance:
derek-zhou
Thanks. I will try this and the other venue I am trying, which is to use a MacroComponent that hide the recursion inside.
derek-zhou
@msaraiva 's example can be simplified to:
Although the component cannot be recursively defined, the
render/1method can call itself recursively, with a made up assigns. This method works as long as the component has no state; because state-less component is basically just arender/1function with maybe some pure function helpers.I don’t know how to achieve the equivalent of recursive stateful component though. I don’t have a usage case so far.
derek-zhou
Note: If you are going to call
render/1manually with a made up assigns like above, it is best to pass in @socket too, like{{ render(%{socket: @socket, node: child}) }}The reason is components pass @socket implicitly, and many things need @socket; so without the @socket in the assigns it can be very confusing.