beatscode

beatscode

Having an issue similar to https://forum.elixirforum.com/t/whats-the-best-way-to-access-and-retrieve-data-from-deeply-nested-maps-and-lists/613/4.

I have a data structure with a nested map I’d like to accumulate into a list. The problem is I don’t know how to recursively get the maps of nested elements.
Here is a contrived version. I’m trying to get a list of all the c and nested c values. Is there a way to do this?

test "Recursive Maps" do
    #I just want all the c's in a list
    rMap = %{:a => 1, :b => 2, :c => %{ :a => 111, :b => 2222, 
        :c => %{ :a => 212, :b => 323, 
            :c => %{:a => 45, :b => 524, 
                :c => %{}}}}}

    rMap2 = %{:a => 3, :b => 4, 
        :c => %{ :a => 5, :b => 6, 
            :c => %{ :a => 7, :b => 8, 
                :c => %{:a => 9, :b => 10, 
                    :c => %{a: 11, b: 12, c: 13}}}}}
                    
    rMaps = [rMap,rMap2]
    IO.puts "rMaps List of Justcs"
    IO.inspect rMaps
    justCs = justc rMaps
    IO.inspect justCs
    
    justCs = justc3 rMaps
    IO.inspect justCs

end
# Loop through list
def justc3(rMaps) do
    Enum.reduce_while(rMaps, [], fn rMap, acc ->
        if Map.has_key?(rMap,:c) == false do
            {:halt, acc}
        else
            c = Map.get(rMap,:c)
            {:cont, [c] ++ acc} 
        end
    end)
end

def justc(rMaps) do
    justCs = for rMap <- rMaps do
        c = Map.get(rMap,:c)
      #  IO.inspect Enum.count(c)
        if Enum.count(c) == 0 do
            []
        else
            Map.get(rMap,:c) 
        end
    end
end

Showing Posts 1 to 6

amnu3387

amnu3387

Why not just divide it into two functions that match on having a :c atom (if you want to match on binary keys too, then adding another function that matches on it) and recur, returning the accumulator if no map with :c is passed?

defmodule Test do
  def get_c(acc, %{:c => c}), do: Test.get_c([c | acc], c)
  def get_c(acc, _), do: acc
end

iex(4)> defmodule Test do
...(4)> def get_c(acc, %{:c => c}), do: Test.get_c([c | acc], c)
...(4)> def get_c(acc, _), do: acc
...(4)> end

{:module, Test,
 <<70, 79, 82, 49, 0, 0, 3, 248, 66, 69, 65, 77, 65, 116, 85, 56, 0, 0, 0, 85,
   0, 0, 0, 9, 11, 69, 108, 105, 120, 105, 114, 46, 84, 101, 115, 116, 8, 95,
   95, 105, 110, 102, 111, 95, 95, 9, 102, ...>>, {:get_c, 2}}

iex(5)> Test.get_c([], %{a: 'test', c: %{a: false, b: true, c: %{c: 1, b: 2, d: 3}}})

[1, %{b: 2, c: 1, d: 3}, %{a: false, b: true, c: %{b: 2, c: 1, d: 3}}]

In case you want to customise at runtime the key that you dig for you could use a case,

def get_arbitrary(acc, %{} = map, key) do
  case map[key] do
    nil -> acc
    value -> get_arbitrary([value | acc], value, key)
  end
end
def get_arbitrary(acc, _, _), do: acc
idi527

idi527

What result do you want to get?

Running justc on rMaps returns

[
  %{a: 111, b: 2222, c: %{a: 212, b: 323, c: %{a: 45, b: 524, c: %{}}}},
  %{a: 5, b: 6, c: %{a: 7, b: 8, c: %{a: 9, b: 10, c: %{a: 11, b: 12, c: 13}}}}
]

for me.

And justc3 on rMaps returns

[
  %{a: 5, b: 6, c: %{a: 7, b: 8, c: %{a: 9, b: 10, c: %{a: 11, b: 12, c: 13}}}},
  %{a: 111, b: 2222, c: %{a: 212, b: 323, c: %{a: 45, b: 524, c: %{}}}}
]

Is that what you want?

Or do you want to get

[nil, 13]

from rMaps?

Can :c be nested inside maps for keys other than :c, like in

%{a: %{c: :c}, c: %{...: ...}}

?

beatscode

beatscode OP

Thank you @amnu3387, Not familiar with [c| acc] syntax. How is it that the acc variable gets accumulated to?
@idi527 I wanted to get every instance of :c in any of the maps and add them to a list

idi527

idi527

Can you provide an example? The exact result you want from rMaps in your post.

beatscode

beatscode OP

The following is for each map but I’m figuring for rMaps I can write a comprehension to append to a parent list

[
  %{},
  %{a: 45, b: 524, c: %{}},
  %{a: 212, b: 323, c: %{a: 45, b: 524, c: %{}}},
  %{a: 111, b: 2222, c: %{a: 212, b: 323, c: %{a: 45, b: 524, c: %{}}}}
]
amnu3387

amnu3387

I just had a little brainfart before, of course that won’t get you 'c’s inside other maps…

defmodule Test do
  def get_cees(map, acc, key) do
    Enum.reduce(map, acc, fn 
      ({k, %{} = v}, acc) when k == key -> Test.get_cees(v, [ v | acc], key)
      ({k, v}, acc) when k == key -> [v | acc]
      ({k, %{} = v}, acc) -> Test.get_cees(v, acc, key)
      (_ , acc) -> acc
      end)
   end
 end

This will though, you match on the arguments that get passed to the reduce function. When you reduce a map you get a {k,v} tuple, so when you get a tuple where v is a map, and the key matches the key you’re searching for, you recur the function, passing v (which is a map), and appending it to the accumulator. When you get a tuple where the value isn’t a map, but the key of the reduction is the key you’re looking for, you just append the value to the accumulator. When you get a tuple where v is a map, but the key isn’t the one you want, you just recur to dig another level, but without appending to the accumulator. Otherwise you just return the accumulator as is, because it means the v isn’t a map (so no need to recur) and the key isn’t the key you want, so no need to append.

Basically [ h | t ] means, give me a list where you append h to another list t (even if empty) and can be used as well to get the head of a list (1 elem), and the tail (n elems) of it.

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews