joangavelan

joangavelan

So I’m building a couple of projects with Elixir/Ash/Phoenix/Inertia/React and I’m being EXTREMELY productive with this stack — I mean it, VERY productive — making great progress on both projects at the same time.

Although, I’ve run into a roadblock that’s been discouraging me and I fear it will get worse. One of the projects has started to grow, and every little change I make in a file is taking quite a while to recompile (incremental compilation). It’s slowing down my productivity a lot. It started at 2–3s and now it’s up to 8–10s on every change.

I’m almost certain this is due to my lack of experience in the language and that I might be doing something wrong with the way I’m architecting/writing my code. I’ve done some research and it seems related to compile/runtime dependencies and the like. I’d really appreciate actionable advice or links to resources that can help me fix this. Will this keep getting worse as my project grows, or can it be kept low?

As a side note, I had Claude analyze my repo and it found 13 circular dependency cycles. I’m sure some of you will resonate with this and can guide me on identifying, measuring, and fixing the problem — and avoiding it in the future.

Thanks in advance.

Showing Posts 1 to 8

arcanemachine

arcanemachine

I can’t help you with the Ash side of things, but you can use this tool to get a more concrete view of your dependency graph if that a concern:

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

You can use xref to help better understand how your modules are connected. There can be a bit of a learning curve but some useful commands are:

mix xref graph --format cycles --label compile-connected

and

mix xref graph --label cycles --sink lib/path/to/file/that/causes/many/recompilations.ex

Cycles aren’t 100% avoidable. For example in has_many and belongs_to relationships, A is going to refer to B and B is going to refer to A. But you should avoid calling functions in this scenario, ie, avoid this:

defmodule A do
  def a, do: B.b()
end

defmodule B do
  def b, do: A.a()
end

This is a bit of a deep topic and there are a lot of threads about this on this forum (search for “transitive dependencies”) as well as some blog posts. Here’s a good one. But it’s very hard to give specific actionable advice without seeing some code (though it would require seeing a lot of code which is of course probably not possible and not something I’d really wanna do, lol).

Some brief tips, though:

  • Avoid defining macros in files that change often.
  • Avoid having modules that you sometimes use in some modules, and sometimes just call random functions (or import) in other modules. Split those up.
  • Avoid calling functions in a module’s body. For example, if you have @foo Foo.bar(), change that to def foo, do: Foo.bar(). This can be ok, but these are brief tips so it’s easier to say Just Don’t Do It.
  • Sometimes you want to avoid even referring to a module in another module’s body (though I believe this isn’t as much of a problem anymore)
  • Along the lines of avoiding cycles: don’t (ever) call any Web functions from your domain modules/resources modules.

That’s all I got. If you have more questions I’m happy to try and answer. I’m not a huge expert here though have helped squash compiletime deps in a few projects and enjoy the topic.

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Wanted to clarify this as it’s not a realistic example—it’s an endless loop that would just crash your program.

The point is is that you don’t even want two modules referring to each other, so don’t even do this:

defmodule A do
  def one do
    B.one()
  end

  def two do
    "Oh hi"
  end
end

defmodule B do
  def one do
    "Oh hi"
  end

  def two do
    A.two()
  end
end

These can be particularly nasty to figure out especially if have a longer chain (which is what it sounds like you have), ie, A calls B which calls C which calls D which calls A again. Usually these chains can be quite long.

Once you manage to get things sorted out, take a look at the Boundary library.

Schultzer

Schultzer

Early abstraction is the root of all evil. Micro-services is a classic example, slow compilation due to module dependency is another. And they are in-fact the same problem.

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

mix xref graph --format cycles --label compile-connected --fail-above 0 in CI is plenty. All other cyclic dependencies are fine and and don’t affect compile times.

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Sure, but it sets poor precedent. I think it’s better to keep designs as DAGish as possible.

In fact I was burned by this recently where at the beginning of the project I intentionally introduced a cycle for convenience. As things evolved, it grew in a real problem where everything started recompiling. It was an easy fix (though tedious) but still.

sodapopcan

sodapopcan

Sorry, I got oddly defensive there. Yes, in relation to OP’s question just fixing the problematic ones are all they need to care about. I was talking more from a clean state point of view.

joangavelan

joangavelan OP

Thank you everyone for your contributions! My mistake was writing inline action hooks within my Ash resources. Moving them into their own modules fixed the issue. I was even experiencing slow compilation times when changing code in my Phoenix controllers, because they referenced Ash domains, which in turn pointed to resources that referenced other modules in the inline hook implementations—creating the so-called transitive dependencies. Breaking those action hooks into separate modules completely solved the problem. Also worth mentioning @zachdaniel for his support in the Ash Discord community. Thanks again!

— All posts loaded —

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

RSP87
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
RemyXRenard
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
samoloth
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
FlyingNoodle
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
marciok
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow. For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Dmk
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews