abtrapp

abtrapp

Hi!

Can somebody please explain this:

iex(9)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "Ö")
true
iex(10)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "ö")
true
iex(11)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "o")
false
iex(12)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "O")
true

Why are all unicode characters that are not from the english alphabet uppercase characters in Elixir (in contrast to every other language I know and the definition of \p{Lu})?

Elixir 1.7.4 (compiled with Erlang/OTP 21)

Showing Posts 1 to 10

mudasobwa

mudasobwa

Creator of Cure

To make it even funnier, erlang re module, Regex relies upon, treats the composed and decomposed unicode characters differently:

iex|1 ▶ :re.run(String.normalize("ö", :nfc),"\\p{Lu}")
#⇒ {:match, [{0, 1}]}
iex|2 ▶ :re.run(String.normalize("ö", :nfd),"\\p{Lu}")
#⇒ {:match, [{1, 1}]}

Note the matched position. I would treat it as a bug in re module, which should probably be addressed.

chriseyre

chriseyre

There is the/u option to enable Unicode support on regex.

Nicd

Nicd

With unicode flag:

iex(1)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/u, "Ö")
true
iex(2)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/u, "ö")
false
abtrapp

abtrapp OP

Thank you very much! That’s not the default? Performance reason? Can’t remember when I used ASCII the last time :smiley:

Btw. Wouldn’t it be better to answer that expression with an error than silently returning a wrong answer?

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

More likely something along the lines of backwards compatibility.

NobbZ

NobbZ

Its not wrong…

If you do not specify the u option, the erlang regex module will interpret the input as latin-1, so a nfd "ö" is "oÌ" <> <<136>> where the second character is uppercase, for an nfc "ö" the regex sees "¶", where the first character is uppercase.

So as you can see the matches are correct.

abtrapp

abtrapp OP

Thanks for the answer.

But latin as default? 8+3 characters were “correct” too for filenames some time ago :wink:

Hope that Elixir will not be the next MS-DOS. Coming from Ruby and hope that after the String handling and this regex default there are not too many things that don’t make any sense and are just “correct” because they have been implemented in a specific way some “hundret” years ago :wink:

Just for the statistics: Latin: < 10% of the websites / Unicode: > 60% (numbers from 2012, today probably much higher). So when Elixir was invented almost nobody used latin any more. So the “/u” as default would make much more sense imho.

This feels more like Java (deprecations for decades) than fun to me… :slight_smile: - luckily most of the language really is fun to work with.

Sorry, forgot the link to the source: Official Google Blog: Unicode over 60 percent of the web

NobbZ

NobbZ

Latin comes from the underlying erlang module. u is not the default as it is usually not needed but has measurable impact. Also it makes it easier to simply drop to the erlang regex module.

There was a similar question recently, perhaps the derailed discussion towards the end might help you?

abtrapp

abtrapp OP

Perfect. Thanks. So it’s either like I thought (performance) or just a lack of interest in ~ 80-90% of the people coding out there - that’s why I loved ruby. no “8+3 filenames” … at least >= 1.9 :smiley: - so maybe there is hope for a future Elixir version too :smiley:

At least I have a solution and some hints to the reason. Happy and satisfied.

Thanks!

Puzzles me that I haven’t found that issue in my regex unicode query I made before posting this. However: No I know that the community here is very helpful :slight_smile:

Cochonours

Cochonours

if you know you don’t need direct unicode matching then there is no need.

Well, it should be in those peculiar cases that a /l or whatever should be specified. I have not worked with Latin-1 text for almost a decade…

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
water
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others? git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
peck
Hi everyone. My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
bradley
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
unaware8150
Hello folks! So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
Alvinkariuki
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
leoschweizer
Hi, we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

mudasobwa
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
KristerV
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
webofbits
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself. My main conc...
#ai
New
budgie
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with. But I don’t use it anymore. Serverless was the promis...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews