abtrapp

abtrapp

Hi!

Can somebody please explain this:

iex(9)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "Ö")
true
iex(10)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "ö")
true
iex(11)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "o")
false
iex(12)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/, "O")
true

Why are all unicode characters that are not from the english alphabet uppercase characters in Elixir (in contrast to every other language I know and the definition of \p{Lu})?

Elixir 1.7.4 (compiled with Erlang/OTP 21)

Showing Posts 1 to 10

mudasobwa

mudasobwa

Creator of Cure

To make it even funnier, erlang re module, Regex relies upon, treats the composed and decomposed unicode characters differently:

iex|1 ▶ :re.run(String.normalize("ö", :nfc),"\\p{Lu}")
#⇒ {:match, [{0, 1}]}
iex|2 ▶ :re.run(String.normalize("ö", :nfd),"\\p{Lu}")
#⇒ {:match, [{1, 1}]}

Note the matched position. I would treat it as a bug in re module, which should probably be addressed.

chriseyre

chriseyre

There is the/u option to enable Unicode support on regex.

Nicd

Nicd

With unicode flag:

iex(1)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/u, "Ö")
true
iex(2)> Regex.match?(~r/\p{Lu}/u, "ö")
false
abtrapp

abtrapp OP

Thank you very much! That’s not the default? Performance reason? Can’t remember when I used ASCII the last time :smiley:

Btw. Wouldn’t it be better to answer that expression with an error than silently returning a wrong answer?

LostKobrakai

LostKobrakai

More likely something along the lines of backwards compatibility.

NobbZ

NobbZ

Its not wrong…

If you do not specify the u option, the erlang regex module will interpret the input as latin-1, so a nfd "ö" is "oÌ" <> <<136>> where the second character is uppercase, for an nfc "ö" the regex sees "¶", where the first character is uppercase.

So as you can see the matches are correct.

abtrapp

abtrapp OP

Thanks for the answer.

But latin as default? 8+3 characters were “correct” too for filenames some time ago :wink:

Hope that Elixir will not be the next MS-DOS. Coming from Ruby and hope that after the String handling and this regex default there are not too many things that don’t make any sense and are just “correct” because they have been implemented in a specific way some “hundret” years ago :wink:

Just for the statistics: Latin: < 10% of the websites / Unicode: > 60% (numbers from 2012, today probably much higher). So when Elixir was invented almost nobody used latin any more. So the “/u” as default would make much more sense imho.

This feels more like Java (deprecations for decades) than fun to me… :slight_smile: - luckily most of the language really is fun to work with.

Sorry, forgot the link to the source: Official Google Blog: Unicode over 60 percent of the web

NobbZ

NobbZ

Latin comes from the underlying erlang module. u is not the default as it is usually not needed but has measurable impact. Also it makes it easier to simply drop to the erlang regex module.

There was a similar question recently, perhaps the derailed discussion towards the end might help you?

abtrapp

abtrapp OP

Perfect. Thanks. So it’s either like I thought (performance) or just a lack of interest in ~ 80-90% of the people coding out there - that’s why I loved ruby. no “8+3 filenames” … at least >= 1.9 :smiley: - so maybe there is hope for a future Elixir version too :smiley:

At least I have a solution and some hints to the reason. Happy and satisfied.

Thanks!

Puzzles me that I haven’t found that issue in my regex unicode query I made before posting this. However: No I know that the community here is very helpful :slight_smile:

Cochonours

Cochonours

if you know you don’t need direct unicode matching then there is no need.

Well, it should be in those peculiar cases that a /l or whatever should be specified. I have not worked with Latin-1 text for almost a decade…

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

katta
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
brecabral
Documentation While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
nseaSeb
Hello, I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
kpanic
Hi everyone, I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding. I sta...
New
velrest
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI. Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
asweet-confluent
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
apz
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

GenericJam
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived. Mob is alive!! Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
mudasobwa
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM. Welcome Cure. It has literally three kille...
New
garrison
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language. Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
mhanberg
Hi everyone! The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available! We’ve published a press release detai...
New
budgie
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders. I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement

Options

Thread Display Mode




Thread Preview

Skip Thread Previews