Asd
Hi,
I am happy to release the Repatch library for mocking and patching implementation in tests and anywhere else. It brings new possibilities which make it possible to make literally any test async.
You can install it and start trying it out in iex right now, while reading the post!
For example,
iex(1)> Mix.install [repatch: "~> 1.1"]
Resolving Hex dependencies...
Resolution completed in 0.01s
New:
repatch 1.1.0
* Getting repatch (Hex package)
==> repatch
Compiling 3 files (.ex)
Generated repatch app
:ok
iex(2)> Repatch.setup
:ok
iex(3)> Repatch.patch Range, :new, fn l, r -> Enum.to_list(Repatch.super(Range, :new, [l, r])) end
:ok
iex(4)> Range.new 1, 10
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
Continue in the docs: Repatch — Repatch v1.6.1
Features
-
Patch any function or macro (except NIF and BIF). Elixir or Erlang, private or public, it can be patched!
-
Designed to work with
async: true. Has 3 isolation levels for testing multi-processes scenarios. -
Requires no boilerplate or explicit DI. Though, you are completely free to write in this style with Repatch!
-
Every patch is consistent and applies to direct or indirect calls and any process you choose.
-
Powerful call history tracking.
-
superandrealhelpers for calling original functions. -
Works with other testing frameworks and even in environments like
iexor remote shell. -
Battle-tested in real world production project. Using Repatch instead of Patch reduced time of the whole test suite by 10-20% (depending on amount of cores on the test runner machine) by reducing the time of sync tests by 2 times.
Quick comparison with other tools
- Mox is a great library but it works only with behaviours which is a good approach from the architectural point of view, but fails to work in situations when you’re using 3rd-party library without behaviours, what makes you wrap every function you want to mock into the behaviour. However, Repatch inherits allowances and global mode approaches from Mox, but implements them in more efficient genserver-less way.
- Patch is a great library too and it has been a good example and Repatch borrows some code from it. Patch doesn’t work with
async: truewhat has been a problem because test suite was getting slower every time it was using Patch. However, Repatch shares same ideas as Patch does. - Mimic is a library I’ve used and loved too and it shares most of it’s features with Repatch, however Repatch is more efficient in local-only (aka private in Mimic terms) patching and has a shared mode. Also, Repatch performs less amount of module recompilations (every module is recompiled at most once) in runtime.
New horizons
Features I describe here are unique to Repatch and they bring new possibilities to write faster tests. Here is a short list of ideas:
- Patching
Applicationand:applicationmodules for async-friendly application env. I did this in my production project and I was able to make every sync test in the project I have to become async. I did not finish the work and benchmarking this approach yet, but I expect around 30s speedup in the whole suite, which is a lot. - Patching
DateTimemodule for time travelling in timestamps. Yes, it’s possible and works for some tests, but I haven’t figured a way to make it work for functions like:erlang.monotonic_time(), so be careful when using these. - Patching
Systemfor async-friendly system env. I don’t usually write code which reads from system env in non-config files, but some people do and now you can test system env in async tests - Patching
Process.sleepandProcess.send_afterfor timeouts manipulation. This is also a risky thing to do, but, as the old Russian saying goes “Those who do not risk, do not drink champagne”!
Afterwords
Don’t be afraid to experiment with Repatch and don’t be afraid to experiment in general. This library was born from understanding that long-lived tools and approaches are limited and there is always a way to move forward.
Trending in Announcing
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex










First 10 of 18 Posts
axelson
Thank you for the library, it looks quite interesting. I like how it’s functionality builds upon other Elixir mocking libraries. Can you talk a bit about how it’s implemented? I’m really curious how it’s able to safely override any call to external modules.
Asd
Sure, here it is: How it works — Repatch v1.6.1
Codebase is really small, around 1.5k lines, so you can read it in half an hour
Asd
Repatch 1.5.0
This is a big update which adds helpers on top of existing patch logic to support
That means that you no longer need to install a bunch of separate libraries, some of which require explicit dependency injection boilerplate, others don’t work with async tests, and so on. You no longer need to keep in mind the different limitations of these libraries with Repatch.
I’ve tried this update on the project of mine, I replaced all TestServer/Bypass, Mox, Patch and ProtoMock code with Repatch, made all of the tests async: true and tests now run 2 times faster, while testing code looks much more cleaner as a bonus.
dimitarvp
Oh, I would love examples! Any links to PRs / commits to demonstrate a before/after?
mudasobwa
The library looks great. For those who are more of self-controlled code, there is also Bex library to generate behaviours for whatever to be mox’ed.
Asd
Unfortunately, I can’t show the project, but I can give the numbers. It used to be 3 minutes sync tests + 1 minute async tests and now it is just 2 minutes async tests + a couple of seconds of sync tests. My goal is to make it possible to rewrite all tests with
async: true.The only tests I can’t make async are those which perform series of DDL transactions in postgres. Well, I mean, I can make them async by using unique database in each test, but it would consume more time to setup then time saved by async
spicychickensauce
Thanks for creating Repatch!
I think this is the best of all the mocking libraries with the least restrictions, and it should deserve a lot more recognition from the community.
Do you have a helper module / small library that you use for this which you can share?
I needed time travel testing in literally every project at some point and I hate to reinvent it every time.
With Repatch I’m currently just doing this, but it’s probably too simple for most situations:
Asd
Hi, uhh, I mentioned it in “New horizons” because it was worth exploring. And I did some exploration and found out that
DateTime.utc_nowusesSystem.os_timewhich uses:os.system_time. And:os.system_timecan’t be patchedDateTime.utc_nowbut it will only replace this call, since, for example, erlang dependencies will use:os.system_timewhich will always return unpatched, real values:erlang.monotonic_timewhich return different kinds of timeSo my conclusion is that it’s not possible to use
Repatchfor 100% compatible time traveling. And it is not possible to use anything else, since erts implementation calls posix gettime directly, without any way to change it on erlang side only for some specific process.My suggestion for you is to try to approach the problem another way: instead of travelling in time in order to make sure that some timers are triggered, you should try to make timeouts for these timers configurable and then set them up in tests accordingly.
spicychickensauce
Hmm, ok, thanks for digging.
However, so far, all my use cases of time traveling were possible by patching just
NaiveDateTimeand similar.In my projects it mostly comes up with logic that involves ecto timestamps, and for those it is enough.
So I’d be happy with a good enough solution that only patches what’s possible.
But yeah, ideally we’d have
travel_tolike in rails that just works across the whole ecosystem..Asd
Well, only thing that I can suggest to improve then is to use
Repatch.patch(NaiveDateTime, :utc_now, fn -> ~N[1990-01-01 00:00:00] end)without an agent. You can then overwrite this patch with[force: true]option in the third argument.But to be honest, I’d have a O_O look on my face if saw a test code like this.