stiang

stiang

Return changeset with constraint error from nested transaction

I have a “smart” put function that takes care of saving (creating or updating) a resource and all its sub resources automatically. It works by recursively calling itself for each sub resource (as deeply as needed).

The database operations are wrapped in a Repo.transaction/1 function, which means that when the put function calls itself, the transactions get nested.

Whenever something fails when saving a sub resource, I want the outer transaction to fail and return some information about what went wrong, typically a changeset with errors.

This works in the general case, but not when a check_constraint/3 results in a changeset with errors. In the example below, the StayPolicyPeriod changeset function has the following validation:

cast(entity, [...])
|> check_constraint(:opens_at, name: "stay_policy_periods_opens_before_start")

This works as it should (setting an error on the changeset instead of causing an exception), but it also seems to trigger a generic rollback which doesn’t return any information.

I’ve created a small script to illustrate the issue:

defmodule TestNestedTransactions do
  require Logger
  import Ecto.Query, warn: false

  alias ApiServer.Repo
  alias ApiServer.V1.Geo.Country
  alias ApiServer.V1.Stays.StayPolicy
  alias ApiServer.V1.Stays.StayPolicyPeriod

  def test_country do
    outer_transaction_result =
      Repo.transaction(fn ->
        inner_transaction_result =
          Repo.transaction(fn ->
            Country.changeset(%Country{}, %{
              name: "Test Country",
              code: "TEST",
              enabled: true
            })
            |> Repo.insert()
          end)

        Logger.info("COUNTRY inner transaction result: #{inspect(inner_transaction_result)}\n")
        inner_transaction_result
      end)

    Logger.info("COUNTRY outer transaction result: #{inspect(outer_transaction_result)}\n")
    outer_transaction_result
  end

  def test_stay_policy_period do
    outer_transaction_result =
      Repo.transaction(fn ->
        inner_transaction_result =
          Repo.transaction(fn ->
            some_stay_policy = from(sp in StayPolicy, limit: 1) |> Repo.one()

            StayPolicyPeriod.changeset(%StayPolicyPeriod{}, %{
              stay_policy_id: some_stay_policy.id,
              period: %Postgrex.Range{
                lower: ~D[2022-01-10],
                upper: ~D[2022-02-01]
              },
              opens_at: ~U[2022-01-20 12:00:00Z]
            })
            |> Repo.insert()
          end)

        Logger.info(
          "STAY POLICY PERIOD inner transaction result: #{inspect(inner_transaction_result)}\n"
        )

        inner_transaction_result
      end)

    Logger.info(
      "STAY POLICY PERIOD outer transaction result: #{inspect(outer_transaction_result)}\n"
    )

    outer_transaction_result
  end
end

TestNestedTransactions.test_country()
TestNestedTransactions.test_stay_policy_period()

which results in the following output:

[info] COUNTRY inner transaction result: {:ok, {:error, #Ecto.Changeset<action: :insert, changes: %{code: "TEST", enabled: true, name: "Test Country"}, errors: [phone_code: {"can't be blank", [validation: :required]}], data: #ApiServer.V1.Geo.Country<>, valid?: false, ...>}}
[info] COUNTRY outer transaction result: {:ok, {:ok, {:error, #Ecto.Changeset<action: :insert, changes: %{code: "TEST", enabled: true, name: "Test Country"}, errors: [phone_code: {"can't be blank", [validation: :required]}], data: #ApiServer.V1.Geo.Country<>, valid?: false, ...>}}}

[info] STAY POLICY PERIOD inner transaction result: {:ok, {:error, #Ecto.Changeset<action: :insert, changes: %{opens_at: ~U[2022-01-20 12:00:00Z], period: %Postgrex.Range{lower: ~D[2022-01-10], upper: ~D[2022-02-01], lower_inclusive: true, upper_inclusive: true}, stay_policy_id: "2d4bb686-713f-4715-812f-6611dc2e2ba7"}, errors: [opens_at: {"is invalid", [constraint: :check, constraint_name: "stay_policy_periods_opens_before_start"]}], data: #ApiServer.V1.Stays.StayPolicyPeriod<>, valid?: false, ...>}}
[info] STAY POLICY PERIOD outer transaction result: {:error, :rollback}

For the Country test, which results in a non-database related validation error, I get what I need from the inner transaction (a changeset that I can process and return as an error to the client, with helpful info about which fields need to be corrected).

But for the StayPolicyPeriod test, I just get {:error, :rollback}.

My understanding is that this happens automatically because the constraint error happens on the database level, and even though it is “handled” by the check_constraint/3 function, it nevertheless causes a generic rollback to happen, because something went wrong at the database level.

Is this simply not solvable? Is there no way to get the changeset from the inner transaction instead of the generic rollback error without any information?

Marked As Solved

dimitarvp

dimitarvp

Welcome to the forum. :tada:

Few things come to mind:

  • Do you have actual DB CHECK CONSTRAINTs? They might be getting in the way.
  • Does the StayPolicyPeriod code touch a changeset where maybe the constraint itself is not mentioned and is only in the DB? You seem to imply that’s not the case, I would double check though (and I don’t have your context, hence the broad suggestion).
  • This might take you a bit of time but I would attempt to make a second variant of the code that utilizes Ecto.Multi and see if the error manifests the same way there.
  • I tried searching for {:error, :rollback}, even as a global GitHub search. Not many helpful leads but DBConnection’s docs have this to say about that return value:

All transaction/3 calls will return {:error, :rollback} if the transaction failed or connection closed and rollback/2 is not called for that transaction/3.

…which, does not help much, does it.

Interesting problem. Hope you keep us posted.

Also Liked

stiang

stiang

All transaction/3 calls will return {:error, :rollback} if the transaction failed or connection closed and rollback/2 is not called for that transaction/3 .

Actually, that does help, and although I had read that before I hadn’t read it carefully enough. If I do Repo.rollback(inner_transaction_result) instead of just returning inner_transaction_result, I get the following output:

[info] COUNTRY inner transaction result: {:ok, {:error, #Ecto.Changeset<action: :insert, changes: %{code: "TEST", enabled: true, name: "Test Country"}, errors: [phone_code: {"can't be blank", [validation: :required]}], data: #ApiServer.V1.Geo.Country<>, valid?: false, ...>}}
[info] COUNTRY outer transaction result: {:ok, {:ok, {:error, #Ecto.Changeset<action: :insert, changes: %{code: "TEST", enabled: true, name: "Test Country"}, errors: [phone_code: {"can't be blank", [validation: :required]}], data: #ApiServer.V1.Geo.Country<>, valid?: false, ...>}}}

[info] STAY POLICY PERIOD inner transaction result: {:ok, {:error, #Ecto.Changeset<action: :insert, changes: %{opens_at: ~U[2022-01-20 12:00:00Z], period: %Postgrex.Range{lower: ~D[2022-01-10], upper: ~D[2022-02-01], lower_inclusive: true, upper_inclusive: true}, stay_policy_id: "d0c4d95c-8cce-47ae-bd99-e42fdfca51c0"}, errors: [opens_at: {"is invalid", [constraint: :check, constraint_name: "stay_policy_periods_opens_before_start"]}], data: #ApiServer.V1.Stays.StayPolicyPeriod<>, valid?: false, ...>}}
[info] STAY POLICY PERIOD outer transaction result: {:error, {:ok, {:error, #Ecto.Changeset<action: :insert, changes: %{opens_at: ~U[2022-01-20 12:00:00Z], period: %Postgrex.Range{lower: ~D[2022-01-10], upper: ~D[2022-02-01], lower_inclusive: true, upper_inclusive: true}, stay_policy_id: "d0c4d95c-8cce-47ae-bd99-e42fdfca51c0"}, errors: [opens_at: {"is invalid", [constraint: :check, constraint_name: "stay_policy_periods_opens_before_start"]}], data: #ApiServer.V1.Stays.StayPolicyPeriod<>, valid?: false, ...>}}}

… which is exactly what I want. It shouldn’t require too much tweaking of the put function to make it do explicit rollbacks in such cases.

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction :smile:

Where Next?

Popular in Questions Top

sergio
In Ruby, I can go: User.find_by(email: "foobar@email.com").update(email: "hello@email.com") How can I do something similar in Elixir? ...
New
senggen
Erlang/OTP 25 [erts-13.2.2] [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [ds:8:8:10] [async-threads:1] 15:22:35.803 [error] gen_event {lager_file_backend...
New
gshaw
What is the idiomatic way of matching for not nil in Elixir? E.g., First way: defp halt_if_not_signed_in(conn, signed_in_account) when...
New
myronmarston
The Elixir Typespec docs show the following syntax for keyword lists in typespecs: # ... | [key: type] # keyword lists...
New
ovidiubadita
Hey all, I discovered Elixir and I love it. I always wanted to learn a functional programming and I intended to go for Haskell, but afte...
New
JulienCorb
I am trying to implement my new.html.eex file to create new posts on my website. new.html.eex: &lt;h1&gt;Create Post&lt;/h1&gt; &lt;%= ...
New
jay1
Why is it that the mnesia database isn’t the most preferred database for use in Elixir/Phoenix?
New
script
If I have a string “1000 cfu/ml” . I want to remove the characters and / and space . So the string is like this "1000" What is the ...
New
jason.o
In the code below, if the create action is not set to accept “extra_key” as an input, it errors out with a message shown above. Is there ...
New
dotdotdotPaul
Okay, I’m having a heck of a time trying to figure out how to best handle the validation of belongs_to associations in Ecto. I’m sure I’...
New

Other popular topics Top

9mm
I am constructing a JSON object (map) and I need to conditionally set a field. I’m trying to write proper elixir-way code… and I’m at a l...
New
senggen
Erlang/OTP 25 [erts-13.2.2] [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [ds:8:8:10] [async-threads:1] 15:22:35.803 [error] gen_event {lager_file_backend...
New
AngeloChecked
What learn first? Rust or Elixir Hi Elixir community! I’m here because i want learn a new language. I’m a junior developer and mainly i ...
New
vegabook
I’m brand new to Phoenix and I have stripped one of the demo applications to the bone. I just want to get an svg up on the screen. Here i...
New
alice
Hey, Just curious what are the main benefits of Elixir compared to Clojure? When is Elixir more useful than Clojure and vice versa? Th...
New
Emily
I have VueJS GUIs with the project generated using Webpack. I have Elixir modules that will need to be used by the VueJS GUIs. I forese...
New
freewebwithme
Using vs code and installed ElixirLS: support and debugger. And I got an error popped up on start up says Failed to run ‘elixir’ comma...
New
jason.o
In the code below, if the create action is not set to accept “extra_key” as an input, it errors out with a message shown above. Is there ...
New
klo
Got a question about when to concat vs. prepending items to list then reversing to achieve appending. So i know lists boil down to [1 | ...
New
lanycrost
Hi everyone! I need implement if…else if…else condition from my elixir code, and anymore of this control flow structures not work proper...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement