Andres
Hello.
Trying to reverse an integer regardless of its sign I wrote the following algorithm:
int = -123456789 #=> Expected result -987654321
def minus_one(int) do
int * -1
end
def sign(int) when int > 0 do
int
|> Integer.to_string()
|> String.reverse()
|> String.to_integer()
end
def sign(int) do
int
|> Integer.to_string()
|> String.replace("-", "")
|> String.reverse()
|> String.to_integer()
|> minus_one()
end
def reverse_integer(int) do
sign(int)
end
Is there a native way to get the sign of a number? like :math.sign()
Any suggestions to improve the algorithm is welcome.
Thanks.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hello,
I’m trying to build a basic Phoenix web-app, and I’d like to use Tailwind.
However, when I launch mix phx.server, I get an error...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
I’m working on a small exercise involving update_in/3, and I came up with this solution:
data = %{
name: "Periodic Table",
category:...
New
I’ve got trouble wrapping my head around the order in which functions are called in this snippet (from Phoenix’s authentication):
toke...
New
Is there any way to avoid the Hologram compiler running when using iex? It seems like the front-end code could potentially be disregarded...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
ExRatatui lets you cook up rich terminal UIs in Elixir, powered by Rust’s ratatui via Rustler NIFs. Build interactive terminal applicatio...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #ai
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 13 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
Andres
Thank you very much for clarifying it.
Eiji
Originally I noticed this on other data too, but I found that it is not a problem in this specific case, because as far as I know
Integer.digits/1will never return list like[1, -2, 3].There is nothing surprising with
83as result, because we have:(3 * 10^0) + (-2 * 10^1) + (1 * 10^2)i.e.(3 * 1) + (-2 * 10) + (1 * 100)i.e.3 - 20 + 100which gives83.Andres
Hi @NobbZ
Thanks so much for sharing.
Andres
But:
This seems a very good topic of conversation.
Eiji
Ah right, my bad - I have edited my first post
Andres
Hello @Ted
I didn’t know that was possible. I’m learning so much, thanks for sharing.
NobbZ
Why converting to a string at all?
Just do the maths:
Andres
Hello @LostKobrakai
Super nice patter matching idea
Yes!
I’m learning so much, thanks for sharing.
Ted
Wow, that is clean!
I’m curious about the reason for two function heads because it seems like the first head works for both positive and negative:
Eiji
@Andres: I can see much simpler way:
Is that what you wanted?
Edit: Code changed after @Ted comment