shahryarjb
Hello, I created an issue in scrivener github, but scrivener owner closed my topic without any help or comment. but I still have a problem with this lib
my Topic:
Hello, when I use Repo.all(query) to load 49 records I have the record concerned and I have no problem all records are displayed , but when I use scrivener to load 20 records on each page like this:
def show_error_brands(pagenumber, category_id) do
query = from u in ErrorBrandSchema,
where: u.category_id == ^category_id,
order_by: [desc: u.inserted_at],
join: c in assoc(u, :error_categories),
select: %{
id: u.id,
title: u.title,
description: u.description,
image: u.image,
status: u.status,
category_id: u.category_id,
inserted_at: u.inserted_at,
updated_at: u.updated_at,
category_name: c.title
}
Repo.paginate(query, %{page: pagenumber, page_size: 20})
end
some data is not displayed, but they exist in my database, I use UUID
I use psql 11 and {:scrivener_ecto, "~> 2.2"} , elixir 1.9 , {:phoenix_ecto, "~> 4.0"}
Help me please
my migration:
defmodule BankError.Repo.Migrations.ErrorBrands do
use Ecto.Migration
def change do
create table(:error_brands, primary_key: false) do
add :id, :uuid, primary_key: true
add :title, :string, size: 150, null: false
add :short_description, :string, size: 164, null: false
add :description, :text, null: false
add :image, :string, size: 200, null: false
add :seo_alias_link, :string, size: 200, null: false
add :seo_words, :string, size: 150, null: false
add :seo_description, :string, size: 164, null: false
add :status, :boolean, null: false
add :category_id, references(:error_categories, on_delete: :nothing, type: :uuid)
timestamps()
end
create(
index(:error_brands, [:seo_alias_link],
# concurrently: true,
name: :unique_index_on_error_brands_seo_alias_link,
unique: true
)
)
end
end
Please help me to fix this, Thanks
my issue: scrivener dosent load some records · Issue #83 · mojotech/scrivener_ecto · GitHub
the other issue without any comment: Paginate join incorrect · Issue #61 · mojotech/scrivener_ecto · GitHub
Trending in Questions
Other Trending Topics
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #ai
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming











Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
Try adding ordering by your uuid. If rows have the same
inserted_atvalue ordering between them is not deterministic.shahryarjb
after clearing this line :
it shows me missing records, but how can order it by inserted_at, when I use UUID?
would you mind giving me a example please ?
by the way, when I add it to my query
I have this problem and it is not fixed
Thank you
LostKobrakai
You can order by multiple columns.
shahryarjb
if you mean I should do like this!?
it dosen’t work, but if I remove order_by line it works me , I don’t know what to do !
NobbZ
You should sort the other way round.
This will only consider
updated_atwhen theids are equal, which is unlikely to happen…shahryarjb
I really don’t know how to sort with other way !!! and I can’t understand, I used UUID then it will not equal with other record,
do you have any sample code or any way to fix this ? because it just works when the order_by line is removed without any table like:
NobbZ
What I meant was, you should do
order_by: [desc: u.updated_at, desc: u.id].The problem with only sorting over
u.updated_atis, that items with the sameupdated_atwill be ordered randomly each time the query is sent to the DB. This is by the design of most databases. That might cause, that an item close to pagination border to hop between pages, and beeing either displayed on neither page or on both.This might then be observed as “items appear twice” or “items are missing”.
shahryarjb
Thanks, I edited my code to:
and it shows me the missing records, but after reading your text, I am afraid this would happen again in the future

NobbZ
Only if they have the same
updated_atandid. And I hopeidwill not clash everAdding the
idto thesorted_byis a trick to stabilize the usually unstable sort.Any column that is guaranteed to have unique values among the result set is fine. For
idits easy to guarantee and therefore its used quite often.acrolink
Informative, thanks @NobbZ.