tim2CF
Let’s say we have a module like
defmodule Foo do
@salt Application.get_env(:foo, :salt, [])
def hash(password) do
try do
{:ok, md5(password, @salt)}
rescue
e -> {:error, {e, __STACKTRACE__}}
end
end
defp md5(password, salt = [_ | _]) do
Enum.reduce(salt, password, &:erlang.md5(&2<>&1))
end
end
And when we call &hash/1 function it returns error
iex(19)> Foo.hash "123"
{:error,
{%FunctionClauseError{
args: nil,
arity: 2,
clauses: nil,
function: :md5,
kind: nil,
module: Foo
},
[
{Foo, :md5, ["123", []], [file: 'iex', line: 27]},
{Foo, :hash, 1, [file: 'iex', line: 22]},
{:erl_eval, :do_apply, 6, [file: 'erl_eval.erl', line: 677]},
{:elixir, :eval_forms, 4, [file: 'src/elixir.erl', line: 265]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :handle_eval, 5, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 249]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :do_eval, 3, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 229]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :eval, 3, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 207]},
{IEx.Evaluator, :loop, 1, [file: 'lib/iex/evaluator.ex', line: 94]}
]}}
And we want to put this stacktrace to Logger (let’s say for easier debugging)
But we see, what stacktrace can contain sensitive data (in example is password = “123”)
Of course we can remove all arguments from stacktrace manually, but in most cases arguments are useful
Maybe there is already implemented solution to remove some arguments of some functions from stacktrace by marking them in module definition somehow?
It would be nice to say somehow that n-th argument of foo function in module Bar is sensitive and should be excluded from stacktrace
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
sfusato
There is ‘Custom struct inspections’ that was just released with Elixir 1.8:
https://github.com/elixir-lang/elixir/blob/v1.8/CHANGELOG.md
Maybe return just the tail of the stack trace and at an upper-level inspect your struct with the returned stack trace. This would obfuscate the password field or whatever you set to hide from your struct.
josevalim
Here is what Plug.Crypto does regarding the stacktrace: plug_crypto/lib/plug/crypto/key_generator.ex at 76a595f26529cd550f32166c3288358e1785fb1f · elixir-plug/plug_crypto · GitHub
zazaian
@sfusato’s response is very good, though it seems that in some instances you’d want to expressly name the excluded struct parameters, rather than list all of the unexcluded ones.
The Inspect protocol actually allows you to name the struct attributes that are excluded from inspection, which is cleaner for circumstances in which most of a struct’s attributes are not private or secret. Here’s an example:
If you had a myriad of secret attributes within a single struct though, using
onlyis probably cleaner and safer, as adding additional secret attributes would not require you to also add them for exclusion:Please note that the
@derivecall does have to be declared above thedefstructkeyword as indicated in theInspectdocs, as shown above.chocolatedonut
Despite all the helpful tips, I still am not able to hide password of the following
:gen_statem-based RabbitMQ consumer:I’d like that the
:configfield (above), which includes the password, be hidden in all these cases::sys.get_state Rabbit.ConsumerRabbit.Consumeroutright crashes and produces such stacktrace (observepasswordin plain sight)What I tried already
format_statusI added
:gen_statemc:format_status/2and also OTP 25 c:format_status/1:This did help as
:sys.get_statusdidn’t print the sensitive:configanymore. But, it didn’t help with neither of the cases 1. or 2. above.Prune args from stacktrace
I wrapped
Rabbit.Consumer’s call to a different process with arescueand pruned args fromSystem.stacktrace()(using the suggestedPlug.Crypto.prune_args_from_stacktrace/1). But, this doesn’t help when:gen_statem/Rabbit.Consumeritself crashes. How can oneprune_args_from_stacktraceof the process itself (be it GenServer, :gen_statem, etc.)?Process.flag(:sensitive, true)Neither of the cases 1. or 2. above were solved.
Docs for the
:sensitiveflag sayThe following bolded part from above
made me hopeful that state will also be included (among disabled features).
So, I saw the following on erlef.github.io:
Alas, this doesn’t seem to be true -
:sys.get_state Rabbit.Consumerstill shows the password.Here’s this section verbatim: