silverdr
Looking for a way to distinguish whether e. g. document.html or document.pdf was requested and to serve appropriate content format in return. Something akin to respond_to in that other framework. I think I solved it already before but I can’t recall now. Hints/pointers appreciated.
Trending in Questions
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Documentation
While reading the Scoped Routes section, I noticed that the documentation currently refers to a problem without explainin...
New
Hello,
I know there is an approach for handling lists that allows for optimized traversal, but I can’t recall the specific method (somet...
New
Hi everyone,
I am toying with the idea of building a “match maker” for giving personal help to people that wants to start coding.
I sta...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
I recently noticed that Elixir’s Logger defaults its primary log level to :debug when no :logger, :level application configuration is pre...
New
I’m new to elixir and just tried to install the elixirLS extension for VScode(ium) and it is throwing some errors that I would like help ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Edit: 2026 May 15 - This post is archived.
Mob is alive!!
Main docs: mob v0.7.11 — Documentation
A bit of explanation for the slightly c...
New
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi everyone!
The first release candidate for the Expert language server project is now available!
We’ve published a press release detai...
New
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Latest Phoenix Threads
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ai
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
silverdr
Yes, I read this one but still don’t feel like this answers it, especially in the context of “viewless” Phx, which is what everybody believes to be the future, man
Also don’t recall making multiple “Views” for that purpose but if there are no other answers then maybe memory doesn’t serve
LostKobrakai
The need for multiple modules comes from the fact that function components normalized to arity-1 functions (
NameSpaceFormat.name(assigns)), which receive only assigns. There’s no additional parameter anymore, which would pass the format to the function transforming assigns to the format being rendered. Switching by format now happens on the view/layout/root layout level withput_view/put_layout/put_root_layoutand them being updated to accept keyword lists.Phoenix.Viewhadrender("name.format", assigns), which could switch on format within the same module. If you want to retain that you can keep usingPhoenix.Viewby manually depending on it.In regards to “viewless phx” I’m not sure what you’re refering to. Yes
Phoenix.Viewis no longer used, but you can and likely will have modules serving the purpose of views still. Personally I’m a fan of phoenix having changed to dumping those modules next to controllers though, as it makes that fact less discoverable. I guess the tldr there would be: On a high level nothing changed (views are still a thing), but the implementation changed.silverdr
Ah, that would explain. So this in fact changed, which might be the reason why in the recent docs I couldn’t find how I think I did it previously. TNX