silverdr
Looking for a way to distinguish whether e. g. document.html or document.pdf was requested and to serve appropriate content format in return. Something akin to respond_to in that other framework. I think I solved it already before but I can’t recall now. Hints/pointers appreciated.
Trending in Questions
I’m working on a project that simulates the bumbl example in the programming phoenix book. It acts almost like an email client. We have a...
New
Hello!
Could someone please give me a help/sample code, how to delete a file from s3 using waffle/waffle_ecto from Phoenix app.
I creat...
New
I’m seeing that a list inside a Kino.DataTable will be interpreted as a charlist, even if the Kino.configure() is set to charlists: :as_l...
New
So my question is quite simple and i have found no conclusive answer on forum, google or AI.
Should we use :erlang.float for Integer to ...
New
Hi, I’ve just set up an application with ash_authentication. There is only magic link strategy for now, so there is no confirmation add o...
New
If a change or preparation module uses Ash.Changeset.get_argument/2 or Ash.Query.get_argument/2 (or any of the other get_argument functio...
New
apply_graft/2 doesn’t rewrite an add_many sub-workflow’s deps on an add step. Grafted jobs cancel with “upstream job was deleted”
Version...
New
Other Trending Topics
I am happy to introduce the very α version of the new programming language compiled to BEAM.
Welcome Cure.
It has literally three kille...
New
Hobbes is a low-level distributed database for the Elixir programming language.
Hobbes provides a simple, safe, and scalable storage lay...
New
Hi there! We created Gust: A task orchestrator inspired by Airflow.
For those who have never heard about Aiflow, it’s a Python-based wor...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Xamal is a deployment tool for Elixir apps that deploys native releases to bare metal servers over SSH. It’s a port of GitHub - basecamp/...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #blog-post
- #ai
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #hex
- #security
- #metaprogramming










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
LostKobrakai
silverdr
Yes, I read this one but still don’t feel like this answers it, especially in the context of “viewless” Phx, which is what everybody believes to be the future, man
Also don’t recall making multiple “Views” for that purpose but if there are no other answers then maybe memory doesn’t serve
LostKobrakai
The need for multiple modules comes from the fact that function components normalized to arity-1 functions (
NameSpaceFormat.name(assigns)), which receive only assigns. There’s no additional parameter anymore, which would pass the format to the function transforming assigns to the format being rendered. Switching by format now happens on the view/layout/root layout level withput_view/put_layout/put_root_layoutand them being updated to accept keyword lists.Phoenix.Viewhadrender("name.format", assigns), which could switch on format within the same module. If you want to retain that you can keep usingPhoenix.Viewby manually depending on it.In regards to “viewless phx” I’m not sure what you’re refering to. Yes
Phoenix.Viewis no longer used, but you can and likely will have modules serving the purpose of views still. Personally I’m a fan of phoenix having changed to dumping those modules next to controllers though, as it makes that fact less discoverable. I guess the tldr there would be: On a high level nothing changed (views are still a thing), but the implementation changed.silverdr
Ah, that would explain. So this in fact changed, which might be the reason why in the recent docs I couldn’t find how I think I did it previously. TNX