fnux

fnux

Hello !

I was expecting :crypto.block_encrypt :aes_ige256 to be symmetric, I don’t get what’s wrong. Can someone enlighten me ?

Here is an example script :

data = <<666::size(256)-unit(8)>>
tmp_aes_key = <<1234567890::size(32)-unit(8)>>
tmp_aes_iv = <<0987654321::size(32)-unit(8)>>

encrypted = :crypto.block_encrypt :aes_ige256, tmp_aes_key, tmp_aes_iv, data
decrypted = :crypto.block_decrypt :aes_ige256, tmp_aes_key, tmp_aes_iv, data

IO.puts "-- Initial Data --"
IO.inspect data
IO.puts "-- Encrypted --"
IO.inspect encrypted
IO.puts "-- Decrypted --"
IO.inspect decrypted

And its output :

-- Initial Data --
<<0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
  0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...>>
-- Encrypted --
<<13, 146, 170, 197, 88, 244, 100, 48, 180, 234, 28, 168, 36, 10, 88, 225, 15,
  232, 33, 201, 90, 37, 54, 105, 155, 70, 166, 40, 128, 12, 107, 11, 234, 61,
  80, 202, 89, 18, 222, 125, 127, 133, 98, 236, 28, 107, 254, 155, 130, 223,
  ...>>
-- Decrypted --
<<200, 243, 4, 223, 10, 44, 240, 101, 171, 77, 103, 159, 39, 239, 138, 91, 108,
  248, 162, 162, 228, 170, 138, 113, 98, 56, 248, 183, 167, 19, 123, 243, 162,
  144, 214, 253, 136, 98, 37, 210, 14, 108, 56, 31, 33, 222, 148, 228, 183, 8,
  ...>>

Thanks !

First 10 of 11 Posts Switch mode

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

Shouldn’t data here be encrypted?

fnux

fnux OP

Ow, my bad. tired

OvermindDL1

OvermindDL1

Hehe, happens to us all. ^.^

Also you can click the checkmark on a post to mark that post as the one that resolves the issue. :slight_smile:

slouchpie

slouchpie

For posterity: don’t use :crypto.block_encrypt for anything new you are writing.

Instead, use :crypto:crypto_one_time.

See here for info: New and Old API — OTP 29.0.2 (crypto 5.9)

ijunaidfarooq

ijunaidfarooq

Hi, I had these 2 methods

  def encode(args) do
    message = format_token_message(args)

    encrypted_message =
      :crypto.block_encrypt(
        :aes_cbc256,
        System.get_env()["SNAP_KEY"],
        System.get_env()["SNAP_IV"],
        message
      )

    Base.url_encode64(encrypted_message)
  end

  def decode(token) do
    encrypted_message = Base.url_decode64!(token)

    message =
      :crypto.block_decrypt(
        :aes_cbc256,
        System.get_env()["SNAP_KEY"],
        System.get_env()["SNAP_IV"],
        encrypted_message
      )

    message |> String.split("|") |> List.delete_at(-1)
  end

I am trying make them work with :crypto:crypto_one_time/4, 5

When I do this

    encrypted_message =
      :crypto:crypto_one_time(
        :aes_cbc256,
        System.get_env()["SNAP_KEY"],
        System.get_env()["SNAP_IV"],
        message,
        true
      )

    Base.url_encode64(encrypted_message)

it says:

# Erlang error: {:badarg, {'api_ng.c', 141}, 'Unknown cipher'}

any clue?

voltone

voltone

The new API only accepts the algorithm atom values listed in the latest :crypto module docs. So :aes_cbc256 should be :aes_256_cbc.

ijunaidfarooq

ijunaidfarooq

but how a same module can do encrypt and decrypt both?

just the last flag for true and false will decide ? its ecrypt or decrypt ?

voltone

voltone

Yes, the last argument is actually an option list, so you could do:

ciphertext = :crypto:crypto_one_time(:aes_256_cbc, key, iv, message, encrypt: true)
plaintext = :crypto:crypto_one_time(:aes_256_cbc, key, iv, ciphertext, encrypt: false)

Passing true or false instead is just a shortcut.

ijunaidfarooq

ijunaidfarooq

thank you.

al2o3cr

al2o3cr

IMPORTANT: unless this code is called with a different value in SNAP_IV every time, there is a potential security hole when reusing an IV with CBC:

Where Next? Top

Trending in Questions Top

stjefim
Hello! Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements: Each workflow con...
New
jonnycharles
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
spammy
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
dli
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app? Looking for hints regarding: Addi...
New
roeland
Kia ora, We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
bottlenecked
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps. Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
rahultumpala
Hello, I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New

Other Trending Topics Top

JesseHerrick
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
jimsynz
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Damirados
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge &amp; Solve. They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
netoum
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
ausimian
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
juhalehtonen
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New

We're in Beta

About us Mission Statement