fnux
Hello !
I was expecting :crypto.block_encrypt :aes_ige256 to be symmetric, I don’t get what’s wrong. Can someone enlighten me ?
Here is an example script :
data = <<666::size(256)-unit(8)>>
tmp_aes_key = <<1234567890::size(32)-unit(8)>>
tmp_aes_iv = <<0987654321::size(32)-unit(8)>>
encrypted = :crypto.block_encrypt :aes_ige256, tmp_aes_key, tmp_aes_iv, data
decrypted = :crypto.block_decrypt :aes_ige256, tmp_aes_key, tmp_aes_iv, data
IO.puts "-- Initial Data --"
IO.inspect data
IO.puts "-- Encrypted --"
IO.inspect encrypted
IO.puts "-- Decrypted --"
IO.inspect decrypted
And its output :
-- Initial Data --
<<0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, ...>>
-- Encrypted --
<<13, 146, 170, 197, 88, 244, 100, 48, 180, 234, 28, 168, 36, 10, 88, 225, 15,
232, 33, 201, 90, 37, 54, 105, 155, 70, 166, 40, 128, 12, 107, 11, 234, 61,
80, 202, 89, 18, 222, 125, 127, 133, 98, 236, 28, 107, 254, 155, 130, 223,
...>>
-- Decrypted --
<<200, 243, 4, 223, 10, 44, 240, 101, 171, 77, 103, 159, 39, 239, 138, 91, 108,
248, 162, 162, 228, 170, 138, 113, 98, 56, 248, 183, 167, 19, 123, 243, 162,
144, 214, 253, 136, 98, 37, 210, 14, 108, 56, 31, 33, 222, 148, 228, 183, 8,
...>>
Thanks !
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
Hi all,
I’m working on a Phoenix project where I need to make external HTTP requests and I’m trying to choose between Req and HTTPoison....
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Hi all, I’m new here and would like to hear peoples views on my Elixir/Phoenix based game-engine! :smiley:
Mutonex gamedesign was finish...
New
Hello
I’ve been coding in Elixir for almost two years now because of my current job where we implemented Elixir in our application. But ...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey there,
I haven’t seen a list of useful Elixir specific skills for the popular AI tools yet so I’m starting one here with my first.
...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #blog-post
- #ecto-query
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
OvermindDL1
Shouldn’t
datahere beencrypted?fnux
Ow, my bad. tired
OvermindDL1
Hehe, happens to us all. ^.^
Also you can click the checkmark on a post to mark that post as the one that resolves the issue.
slouchpie
For posterity: don’t use
:crypto.block_encryptfor anything new you are writing.Instead, use
:crypto:crypto_one_time.See here for info: New and Old API — OTP 29.0.2 (crypto 5.9)
ijunaidfarooq
Hi, I had these 2 methods
I am trying make them work with
:crypto:crypto_one_time/4, 5When I do this
it says:
# Erlang error: {:badarg, {'api_ng.c', 141}, 'Unknown cipher'}any clue?
voltone
The new API only accepts the algorithm atom values listed in the latest
:cryptomodule docs. So:aes_cbc256should be:aes_256_cbc.ijunaidfarooq
but how a same module can do encrypt and decrypt both?
just the last flag for true and false will decide ? its ecrypt or decrypt ?
voltone
Yes, the last argument is actually an option list, so you could do:
Passing
trueorfalseinstead is just a shortcut.ijunaidfarooq
thank you.
al2o3cr
IMPORTANT: unless this code is called with a different value in
SNAP_IVevery time, there is a potential security hole when reusing an IV with CBC: