otuv
Hi,
Lets say I have a struct, lets say named Struct with the singular field x (default 0).
When I create it I get &Struct{x: 0}
Since they are maps I then use Map.put to add something else like y: 5 I get %{struct: S, x: 0, y: 5} and it is no longer an Stuct
Is there some way to purge any non struct fields and restore it to an Struct?
(Here the whole idea is obviously stupid)
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
Kia ora,
We have been using elixir-google-api to connect to Google Drive. However, with the updates to Tesla due to CVEs this is now bro...
New
Hello,
I have an Elixir backend that implements a custom protocol over TCP. I want to load test the backend and assess the performance o...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Corex is an accessible, unstyled UI component library for Phoenix that integrates Zag.js state machines using Vanilla JavaScript and Live...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #blog-post
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #ai
- #genstage
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #security
- #hex










First 4 of 4 Posts
gregvaughn
Here’s one approach. I chose the URI struct because it’s small and in the std lib.
struct/2ignores keys that are not specified in the struct itselfbrettbeatty
I prefer the previous answer, but another option would get a list of keys expected in the struct and take them from the map.
Building on the other example:
Two downsides to this approach compared to the previous:
struct/0at least, which at that point you might as well do the other).otuv
Looking at these answers I realized that my existing code is a bit backwards and what I really wanted can be done better with this solution.
Thank you both for replies!
ityonemo
you can also use map cons, if you would like for your code to crash when you try to assign a nonexistent field, lets you catch errors in tests (how good is your test coverage? lol)
will crash on do_something. Whenever it’s a struct, I prefer using map cons for that bailout behaviour.