Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Supervisor.start_link/2 documentation incomplete?
Background
I am trying to build an OTP compliant app using supervisors. However I am having trouble interpreting a part of the documentation.
Docs
The documentation states that Supervisor.start_link/2 returns the following:
{:ok, pid}
| :ignore
| {:error, {:already_started, pid} | {:shutdown,term} | [term]}
Problem
The problem is that even though the documentation specifies when start_link returns {:ok, pid} and {:error, any} it doesn’t specify when it returns :ignore, leaving me to think that it can never return :ignore.
Question
In which cases does Supervisor.start_link/2 return :ignore?
Trending in Questions
Hello!
Suppose you are building workflow (order / task / payment) processing system with the following requirements:
Each workflow con...
New
I’m in search of an Elixir library that offers PDF generation capabilities similar to Ruby’s Prawn. While there have been discussions abo...
New
I’m looking to build a personal workflow to quickly deploy web applications written in elixir/phoenix, for local consumption (ie not on t...
New
Using Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine as an EEx.Engine is deprecated!
To compile HEEx, use Phoenix.LiveView.TagEngine.compile/2 instead.
Sta...
New
Before I dive in myself, did anyone successfully sprinkle Hologram into their existing LiveView app?
Looking for hints regarding:
Addi...
New
Hi all, I wanted to ask how the community is dealing with post-release steps.
Today we have Ecto migrations, which make sure that the db...
New
I am using Oban and occasionally, shortly after a deployment, a handful of jobs can fail because of dependency on other parts of the syst...
New
Other Trending Topics
Hey, I’m Jesse and I’m the main contributor behind Dexter, a full-featured, lightning-fast Elixir LSP optimized for large codebases. It s...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
Hello everyone. After busy few months I am happy to announce v0.1.0 of Emerge & Solve.
They are GUI (Emerge) and State management (S...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
I just stumbled on a newly redesigned elixir-lang.org. :tada: It looks like @Software_Mansion did the work, and I think it is generally a...
New
@hugobarauna and I (Alex Koutmos) have been hard at work on writing a book on Nerves that takes you from simply blinking LEDs to building...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #deployment
- #library
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #channels
- #elixirconf
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #javascript
- #podcasts
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #blog-post
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #ai
- #elixirconf-us
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #api
- #forms
- #metaprogramming
- #hex
- #performance










First 10 of 15 Posts
peerreynders
If I understand it correctly in module-based supervisors.
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Yes, but those use
Supervisor.start_link/3andSupervisor.init/2. In short, they don’t useSupervisor.start_link/2.LostKobrakai
If
init/1returns:ignorethen start_link will return:ignore. This is useful if you want to selectively start certain parts of your supervision tree / workers.It’s explicitly documented here GenServer — Elixir v1.20.2
peerreynders
The
init/1callback is allowed to return{:ok, {:supervisor.sup_flags(), [:supervisor.child_spec()]}} | :ignore[Erlang] Designing for Scalability with Erlang/OTP (O'Reilly) p.81:
p.178
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Yes, but how is any of this related to
Supervisor.start_link/2?I don’t care what the children may or may not return. It is specified how the
Supervisor.start_link/2function behaves for those scenarios.What I really want to know is when
Supervisor.start_link/2returns:ignore.In what circumstances?
LostKobrakai
A supervisor has an
init/1callback as well as workers have. So both actually work the same in regards to returning:ignorefrom that callback.Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Forgive me for my ignorance, but I still don’t see how any of this affects the return value of
Supervisor.start_link/2If a child returns an error, the supervisor returns one.
If a child returns :ok or :ignore, the supervisor returns :ok.
So … when really?
peerreynders
A supervisor can be a child of a supervisor.
LostKobrakai
When the supervisor itself (it’s
init/1) returns:ignorethenSupervisor.start_linkreturns:ignore.E.g.
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Excellent example!
But where is that code is the usage of
Supervisor.start_link/2?EDIT: ignore me, I get it now.
Thanks for the help!