Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Background
I am trying to build an OTP compliant app using supervisors. However I am having trouble interpreting a part of the documentation.
Docs
The documentation states that Supervisor.start_link/2 returns the following:
{:ok, pid}
| :ignore
| {:error, {:already_started, pid} | {:shutdown,term} | [term]}
Problem
The problem is that even though the documentation specifies when start_link returns {:ok, pid} and {:error, any} it doesn’t specify when it returns :ignore, leaving me to think that it can never return :ignore.
Question
In which cases does Supervisor.start_link/2 return :ignore?
Trending in Questions
I’m aware of 2 such projects, are there others?
git: GitHub - team-alembic/realworld: A fullstack Phoenix LiveView application with back...
New
I having some trouble figuring out if I have set myself too strict of standards for my production server. Currently I can handle 75% of r...
New
Hi everyone.
My team and I have been working on a fairly modest app based around video streaming and chat, but we’ve landed a customer t...
New
I really like the adapter patterns that ecto, nebulex, waffle, etc. use and would love find something similar for a key management servic...
New
Hello folks!
So at work, we are seeing some situations where we have to define some “fixed” strings that are used across the codebase in...
New
How Can I Optimise Compile Time Dependencies
I have been building an elixir application for about 2 years now. Many modules and files ha...
New
Hi,
we run different LLM models across a cluster, with each node loading a configurable subset. Model-specific queues let nodes consume ...
New
Other Trending Topics
A little off-topic, but I feel like people here have a good head on their shoulders.
I used to be quite good at making software. Was luc...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #performance










Showing Posts 1 to 10- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
peerreynders
If I understand it correctly in module-based supervisors.
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Yes, but those use
Supervisor.start_link/3andSupervisor.init/2. In short, they don’t useSupervisor.start_link/2.LostKobrakai
If
init/1returns:ignorethen start_link will return:ignore. This is useful if you want to selectively start certain parts of your supervision tree / workers.It’s explicitly documented here GenServer — Elixir v1.20.2
peerreynders
The
init/1callback is allowed to return{:ok, {:supervisor.sup_flags(), [:supervisor.child_spec()]}} | :ignore[Erlang] Designing for Scalability with Erlang/OTP (O'Reilly) p.81:
p.178
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Yes, but how is any of this related to
Supervisor.start_link/2?I don’t care what the children may or may not return. It is specified how the
Supervisor.start_link/2function behaves for those scenarios.What I really want to know is when
Supervisor.start_link/2returns:ignore.In what circumstances?
LostKobrakai
A supervisor has an
init/1callback as well as workers have. So both actually work the same in regards to returning:ignorefrom that callback.Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Forgive me for my ignorance, but I still don’t see how any of this affects the return value of
Supervisor.start_link/2If a child returns an error, the supervisor returns one.
If a child returns :ok or :ignore, the supervisor returns :ok.
So … when really?
peerreynders
A supervisor can be a child of a supervisor.
LostKobrakai
When the supervisor itself (it’s
init/1) returns:ignorethenSupervisor.start_linkreturns:ignore.E.g.
Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Excellent example!
But where is that code is the usage of
Supervisor.start_link/2?EDIT: ignore me, I get it now.
Thanks for the help!