Tano
Currently I am reading Elixir In Action and it is mentioned there for Task.async that the return value of the executed lambda is sent back as a message to the starter process. I am a bit confused here or maybe missed some important part of the text, please correct me if I am wrong: it means that even if i dont care for the return value of the lambda i must have something like handle_info to catch the message that is send back or ? Because if i dont handle the message it will just stay in the mail box forever, thanks guys
Trending in Discussions
There has been a thread to discuss the Stack Overflow Developer Survey on this forum every year since 2018, so here’s yet another one for...
New
Hi there! :wave:
@frigidcode and I (but mostly him) have been running an Elixir Book club, we’re almost done with Designing Elixir Syste...
New
I love Elixir. It’s one of 2 programming languages I’ve ever fallen in love with.
But I don’t use it anymore.
Serverless was the promis...
New
What IDE or editor are you using for Elixir development?
Personally, I use Zed, and I really like it, but sometimes I wish there were a ...
New
Fly’s CEO posted this recently - Turn And Face The Strange · The Fly Blog
It says that Fly is going all-in on sprites, which is a worry ...
New
This was an interesting post by Jose. Curious to hear what others think. Evolving programming languages in the AI era - Dashbit Blog
Gen...
New
In my third year of college, around 2010, I found Erlang. A few years later, I found Elixir. I liked the ideas at once: many small proces...
New
Other Trending Topics
I fully migrated to my own harness from Anthropic/Gemini and I think it’s time to share it. Welcome DSH, the DeepSeek Harness, fully writ...
New
Hey. Is there anyone here who creates agents in their apps? Not talking about using agents, but creating them. I’m finding it pretty diff...
New
Beam Bots (or just BB for short) is a framework for building fault-tolerant robotics applications in Elixir using familiar OTP patterns. ...
New
With AI doing more of the implementation work, I’ve been wondering how much coding I should deliberately keep doing myself.
My main conc...
New
Emily is an Elixir library that runs Nx computations on Apple’s MLX. Install it as the default Nx backend and Nx, defn, Axon, Nx.Serving,...
New
(I just needed to vent somewhere and LinkedIn is full of hope, or hype, I’m not sure which exactly)
AI dream has many faces, but general...
New
Categories:
Sub Categories:
Forums
Popular Tags
- #ecto
- #liveview
- #troubleshooting
- #learning-elixir
- #library
- #deployment
- #erlang
- #testing
- #genserver
- #mix
- #absinthe
- #remote-other
- #otp
- #plug
- #how-to-question
- #macros
- #postgres
- #elixirconf
- #channels
- #exunit
- #discussion
- #code-sync
- #podcasts
- #javascript
- #onsite
- #dialyzer
- #docker
- #authentication
- #ai
- #umbrella
- #full-time-contract
- #podcasts-by-brainlid
- #ecto-query
- #blog-post
- #elixirconf-us
- #elixir-ls
- #phoenix_html
- #iex
- #graphql
- #genstage
- #websockets
- #supervisor
- #advent-of-code
- #distillery
- #processes
- #elixirconf-eu
- #api
- #forms
- #security
- #hex










Showing Posts 1 to 4- Show Best Posts
- Show All (oldest first)
- Show All (newest first)
NobbZ
Yes. Exactly.
I’m not aware of a
Tasklike thing that can be run solely for its side effects. But exactly the current behaviour of sending back “unwanted” messages makes it break applications, or at least creates a lot of confusing log messages.@Fl4m3Ph03n1x created a lot of threads to trace down those messages, and I’m not even sure if they ever found the actual source of the stray messages.
bugant
Yes, it’s quite clear in the doc I’d say. See https://hexdocs.pm/elixir/Task.html:
And, so
Task.awaitis used to read the message sent by the task.jwarlander
The documentation also suggests several other ways to run tasks, @Tano, if you don’t want this behavior, eg.
Task.start_link/1,Task.start/1, or starting tasks under aTask.Supervisor.Fl4m3Ph03n1x
Yes, I found the processes sending the messages, but the methodology we used is not fit for production, unless you don’t mind killing a machine with all the logging or slowing it down considerably.
There are many ways of finding out which process is receiving an unhandled message, but there is no straight way. I have compiled a list of all the relevant posts I created regarding this topic for your convenience, should you ever venture this far into message passing:
Still, if you follow the recommendations for Task.async and Task.await, you will (hopefully) never need this information, unless you are using a 3rd party library that doesn’t follow the conventions (as was our case).